My old audio-cdr's are starting to sound like vinyl records
Seems like something weird has happened to them, I burned them when 10 years ago, used them a lot, didn't put them in cd-cases...
Now instead of constantly stuttering, glitching and skipping like you would expect a normal damaged audio-cd to do, they sound like f*****g oldschool vinyl records, got that grainy, hissy noise over them, they playback fine, no skipping, but they are all noisy, sometimes even completely distorted.
My mate tells me he has never heard of anything like this and I can't find anything about it on the internet.
Does anyone know if it's just because they are damaged? Because they don't skip at all and the discs themselves look normal too (a bit dusty tho).
Anyone else has this issue?
I thought that the audio of audio-cd's could not get altered that way since the discs are read only, but I guess that damage can do literally anything to them.
Have you listened to the same CD-Rs in a different CD player and with different earphones? I'd eliminate hardware problems first.
CD-R quality varies greatly. Are these CD-Rs a name brand? A no-name white-label brand? The cheap ones can have issues with the dye and silver backing. In fact, dome CD-Rs were so cheap that the backing actually peels and flakes off. If a cheap CD-R was not stored in a jewel case to protect it, it could have issues. I have never experienced anything like what you're describing, but I have had bad CD-Rs where a file wasn't readable here and there. I use the highest quality DVD media for backups. (Tayio Yuden, Verbatim, Ri-Data, and others.) I no longer use CD-Rs. The high-quality media lasts indefinitely if stored properly. I have data CD-Rs going back to the late 90s.
Now instead of constantly stuttering, glitching and skipping like you would expect a normal damaged audio-cd to do, they sound like f***ing oldschool vinyl records, got that grainy, hissy noise over them, they playback fine, no skipping, but they are all noisy, sometimes even completely distorted.
My mate tells me he has never heard of anything like this and I can't find anything about it on the internet.
Does anyone know if it's just because they are damaged? Because they don't skip at all and the discs themselves look normal too (a bit dusty tho).
Anyone else has this issue?
I thought that the audio of audio-cd's could not get altered that way since the discs are read only, but I guess that damage can do literally anything to them.
I haven't experienced this either, but some of the things discussed on the Wikipedia page about CD-R's sound very similar to what you're reporting....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-R
Basically, the bottom line is that a CD-R works by using a high powered laser to heat spots of dye on the disc - when heated , the optical properties of the dye changes. so that its reflectivity changes. When you read the disc, a laser is reflected off of the surface of the disc and an optical sensor looks for the reflections, which are then decoded to reproduce whatever data was intended to be stored on the disc. But the dye can degrade over time and when that happens, the information degrades right along with it.
Background hiss cannot possibly be due to damage to the CD-R and the cause is something else.
Sunburn? Dust?
Consistent background hiss - are you sure either the audio wasn't always that way and your equipment is just better now, or that there isn't something wrong with your setup and all your audio has hiss? I've never seen a situation either where something like tape hiss could be introduced to a digital track through degradation.
Something like Exact Audio Copier will test a CD as it rips, so you will get a detailed analysis of the number and type of read errors on the CDs. Storage is so cheap and player software so good that it is worth ripping them all to magnetic storage and locating new copies of anything that is corrupted.
Mind you that I left these cd-r's lying on the desk 24/7 without the case and with the sun shining on them for years.
A lot of those "oldies" have this hissy sound right now, but 1/4 of those do not, depends how much i used them during the old days.
Newer cd-r's definitely don't have them and yes, when cd-r's hiss, they hiss on every playback device and usually the first and the last track don't hiss, but all those between them do.
I used a lot of different brands too, so no, it's not related to just one brand, but they could be all crap brands tho, I don't know if they were really cheap for cd-r's.
And yes it sounds weird but they don't skip, like at all, ripping them results in almost no errors with EAC.
If EAC is not giving any errors, then it is almost definite that the audio is exactly the same as you originally wrote to the CDs, and has not degraded. There is another application (called OnTrack or something like that) which can do a more comprehensive analysis of the error distribution on a CD or DVD surface, but I doubt that it will reveal anything if EAC is set to maximum detection and not detecting anything.
Is it possible that the software that you used however many years ago produced worse rips? Duplicating an audio CD (in most applications) does not create a bit-wise copy, but re-encodes the audio stream. Most applications now do it better than most applications 10 years ago. Is it possible that your playback equipment is better now and revealing faults you didn't notice before?
You may or may not be able to back the stuff up to 16b/44KHz .wav files to a spare HDD you might have laying around for long term storage. That being said, I think that the damage has already been done.
FWIW, there really isn't any form of CDR that is archive quality. --Analog tape when stored in proper condition will outlive even a glass master CD.
_________________
When There's No There to get to, I'm so There!
^^^
in 1967 at a meeting of the audio engineering society, it was described in a paper/presentation, that analog tapes recorded at 3&3/4 inches per second and below had "fugitive trebles" and suffered disproportionately from drop-outs. and many of my old cassette tapes [stored in air-conditioned low-humidity conditions for the decades] have drop-outs and muted trebles. aside from analog signals on tape, what about all those zillions of DATs and Umatic digital tapes that are now unplayable? were they ALL stored "improperly"? aside from regulated temperatures and humidity, what else is needed to "properly" store a magnetic tape? magnetic recording tape is too fragile to be a reliable archival medium, there are too many cases of stretched tapes, tapes with patches of emulsion gone, sticky-shed, splices gone bad, etc.
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Do you prefer the sound of vinyl or CD? |
22 May 2008, 5:28 am |
| Vinyl!!!!!!!!! |
28 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm |
| Anyone into Vinyl? |
11 Nov 2005, 4:14 pm |
| Do you still listen to vinyl? |
29 Apr 2010, 1:24 pm |
