Same-sex marriage is now legal all over the United States an

Page 1 of 3 [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

NewTime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2015
Posts: 1,981

10 Oct 2017, 7:52 pm

Same-sex marriage is now legal all over the United States and it hasn't led to there being more gay people, to people marrying dogs, people marrying corpses or people marrying toasters, all those things that people said would happen if they made same-sex marriage legal.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,739
Location: the island of defective toy santas

10 Oct 2017, 8:00 pm

just wait for the next constitutional convention....



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 45,529
Location: Houston, Texas

11 Oct 2017, 12:54 am

It's been legal for over 2 years now.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!

Now proficient in ChatGPT!


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

11 Oct 2017, 8:37 am

NewTime wrote:
Same-sex marriage is now legal all over the United States and it hasn't led to there being more gay people, to people marrying dogs, people marrying corpses or people marrying toasters, all those things that people said would happen if they made same-sex marriage legal.


It's like Watergate, you have to give it lots of time to transpire. And what do you have against my and my toaster being happy?



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

11 Oct 2017, 8:42 am

Yeah....and me and my precious kitty cat (though our relationship is Platonic).



LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

11 Oct 2017, 10:22 am

Jeremy Irons was right ...

‘Could A Father Not Marry His Son?’
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/ ... 09495.html

Now ...

'Father' Marries His 'Son'
http://www.newser.com/story/207464/fath ... mpaign=syn



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

11 Oct 2017, 10:30 am

Man....that would be so sick!

But it doesn't mean society is going that way. Because it's not.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,470
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

11 Oct 2017, 10:45 am

LoveNotHate wrote:
Jeremy Irons was right ...

‘Could A Father Not Marry His Son?’
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/ ... 09495.html

Now ...

'Father' Marries His 'Son'
http://www.newser.com/story/207464/fath ... mpaign=syn


I don't see why gay marriage would change the rules on incest marrige

Also the people in the second article you posted weren't actually father and son, but since their gay marriage wouldn't be recognized one adopted the other and they posed as father and son legally. Also says the court had to dissolve the adoption for them to marry.

Not even close to the same thing as a biological father and son having an incestual gay relationship.


_________________
We won't go back.


GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

11 Oct 2017, 7:22 pm

It is nice to see less s without a just cause.

Regards
DL



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

11 Oct 2017, 8:54 pm

During my recent visit to Australia, someone said to me: "I'm ashamed to be an Aussie right now. FFS, even Ireland has same sex marriage! New Zealand does, the USA does. I never thought I would see the day that Ireland would make us look so bad".



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,739
Location: the island of defective toy santas

11 Oct 2017, 11:50 pm

B19 wrote:
During my recent visit to Australia, someone said to me: "I'm ashamed to be an Aussie right now. FFS, even Ireland has same sex marriage! New Zealand does, the USA does. I never thought I would see the day that Ireland would make us look so bad".

granted, gay marriage is a just and ethical thing as an institution, and a karmically risky thing to oppose for any reason. that said, I have to say i'm ashamed to live in a nation that still treats health care mostly as a privilege of wealth and not a right of citizenship as it is in every other western nation. so in that sense i'd trade places with that ashamed Aussie in a :heart: beat.



GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

12 Oct 2017, 8:52 am

GnosticBishop wrote:
It is nice to see less discrimination without a just cause.

Regards
DL



LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

12 Oct 2017, 9:17 am

Sweetleaf wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
Jeremy Irons was right ...

‘Could A Father Not Marry His Son?’
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/ ... 09495.html

Now ...

'Father' Marries His 'Son'
http://www.newser.com/story/207464/fath ... mpaign=syn


I don't see why gay marriage would change the rules on incest marrige

Also the people in the second article you posted weren't actually father and son, but since their gay marriage wouldn't be recognized one adopted the other and they posed as father and son legally. Also says the court had to dissolve the adoption for them to marry.

Not even close to the same thing as a biological father and son having an incestual gay relationship.

The justification for "incest" is to stop "inbreeding".

However, two men can't have a child.

So, this is just discrimination.

Gay marriage makes "adult-father-son-marriage" a civil rights cause.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,504
Location: Right over your left shoulder

16 Oct 2017, 8:01 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
Jeremy Irons was right ...

‘Could A Father Not Marry His Son?’
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/ ... 09495.html

Now ...

'Father' Marries His 'Son'
http://www.newser.com/story/207464/fath ... mpaign=syn


I don't see why gay marriage would change the rules on incest marrige

Also the people in the second article you posted weren't actually father and son, but since their gay marriage wouldn't be recognized one adopted the other and they posed as father and son legally. Also says the court had to dissolve the adoption for them to marry.

Not even close to the same thing as a biological father and son having an incestual gay relationship.

The justification for "incest" is to stop "inbreeding".

However, two men can't have a child.

So, this is just discrimination.

Gay marriage makes "adult-father-son-marriage" a civil rights cause.


There's still a power imbalance between, you'd sound less insane attempting to argue 'brother+brother' or 'sister+sister' marriage is a civil rights cause, but only less.


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

17 Oct 2017, 12:03 am

funeralxempire wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
Jeremy Irons was right ...

‘Could A Father Not Marry His Son?’
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/ ... 09495.html

Now ...

'Father' Marries His 'Son'
http://www.newser.com/story/207464/fath ... mpaign=syn


I don't see why gay marriage would change the rules on incest marrige

Also the people in the second article you posted weren't actually father and son, but since their gay marriage wouldn't be recognized one adopted the other and they posed as father and son legally. Also says the court had to dissolve the adoption for them to marry.

Not even close to the same thing as a biological father and son having an incestual gay relationship.

The justification for "incest" is to stop "inbreeding".

However, two men can't have a child.

So, this is just discrimination.

Gay marriage makes "adult-father-son-marriage" a civil rights cause.


There's still a power imbalance between, you'd sound less insane attempting to argue 'brother+brother' or 'sister+sister' marriage is a civil rights cause, but only less.

You still need to come up with some legal reason for discrimination other than "it's insane".



Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 36
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

17 Oct 2017, 12:04 am

LoveNotHate wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
Jeremy Irons was right ...

‘Could A Father Not Marry His Son?’
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/ ... 09495.html

Now ...

'Father' Marries His 'Son'
http://www.newser.com/story/207464/fath ... mpaign=syn


I don't see why gay marriage would change the rules on incest marrige

Also the people in the second article you posted weren't actually father and son, but since their gay marriage wouldn't be recognized one adopted the other and they posed as father and son legally. Also says the court had to dissolve the adoption for them to marry.

Not even close to the same thing as a biological father and son having an incestual gay relationship.

The justification for "incest" is to stop "inbreeding".

However, two men can't have a child.

So, this is just discrimination.

Gay marriage makes "adult-father-son-marriage" a civil rights cause.


Always thought the incest examples were funny, but not the main problem. The "slippery slope" of gay marriage will of course lead to such ridiculous things but the most worrying one would be polygamy. Such "marriages" can easily be argued on exactly the same grounds as the gay marriage debate was fought on. Lo and behold what did I see on the BBC a few weeks ago? A Muslim asking for legal recognition for polygamous marriages, repeatedly referencing gay marriage. The slippery slope should not always be dismissed as fallacy.


_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!