Nation Once Again Comes Under Sway Of Pink-Faced Half-Wit

Post Reply New Topic

In a way, it may be kind of a good thing if some of the younger whites 'go without' for a change, and then get properly riled up and then correctly oriented as they see their 'new neighbors,' coming in and getting the choice jobs and plum government perks.

The problem is still that most older white people still have it too good........... They have too much at stake financially in the current national system. Also, people over age 45 or so have had ample time to participate in white-flight and amply prepare themselves for 2042. The younger whites have been forced to stay mixed in for the most part, and actually spend their formative years in diversity.

I would almost hope though that even if the younger whites suffer materially from the fallout of diversity, then at least they will profit spiritually.

Younger whites may become sort of a 'lost generation' that gets ignored by their teachers and bosses in favor of coddled minority bonus-babies. They will begin to see just how much of a place they really have in the Obamanation(none), and see that from here on out, they will only get the leftovers. They'll see that the older Baby Boomer whites have already completely filled the white job quota, and that they have no chance to play a role in public life. Younger whites will see that their current status will only decrease from where it is at present as their numbers continue to shrink, and as they have no united voice. As the numbers of minorities get larger and larger, they will keep lobbying for more set-asides, more preferences, while younger whites will have absolutely no voice at all................. Then all it would take is a severe enough economic recession for the s**t to hit the fan.

Likely, white armies would be qualitatively superior and have the edge over a larger minority horde. Smaller Occidental armies have routinely trounced larger brown forces throught history and the next American Civil War based on race will likely be no different. The minorities will likely launch their attacks en masse with no tactical planning and be cut down by a few technologically-minded superior whites. (this could be a side result of placing underqualified minorities in many skilled positions where this will have a huge effect on national efficiency, and this will be felt on the Obama-side when the event comes.)

Many American blacks have about the same emotional maturity as a White American teenager IMO. Really, many black adults are really like large children developmentally. While White people will generally sit down and talk out their differences in a civilized manner, black people often fight just to fight at the drop of a hat over the slightest pretext. Its almost like black people just enjoy petty conflict as their natural state, even if there is no real issue. They will create a problem just to create one.

I think that the corporatists wish to generally phase out white people and replace them with a large black population, as they feel that blacks are the much better targets for mass-marketing, due to their current high level of inner-conformity with eachother. This is why you currently see such a large percentage of blacks in USA advertisements, relative to the general population. Blacks all wear the same clothes, and listen to the same music, and eat the same food, etc etc.........

Black adults are really like large children with primoridal desires, and can be easily manipulated, while white people have become very cynical to televised commericals and we have too many white non-conformists to make advertising to whites profitable.

If you lined up 100 black people, you'd find that they are all very similar to eachother with regards to taste and intellect. You could just make one product and push it on them. All you'd have to do is slap Sponge Bob on a pair of low-cut pants, and they'd buy it right up.

White people by contrast no longer fit one or even several different paradigms. You have to make tens of thousands of different products to encompass the full range of white interests.

Wow, that is one of the most offensive rants I've ever seen in public. Manson family all the way.

^ I didn't say all the time........ lol

yeah, we've lost a few wars where we've been swamped, but usually it seems that one white is worth about 20 - 50 of them on any given day on the battlefield.

Most of the time though: Omdurman, the Tet Offensive, Sarikamis, Lepanto, Malta, Vienna (1683), Alexander the Great's whole career............ There are so many examples but my head hurts to list them all.

^ there are many more examples............

^ Yeah, I'm talking about a tactical level, something you may or may not understand. You are discussing the abstract strategic considerations.

Obviously there were flukes like Adowa, but then again, the Italians never quite got their s**t together.

Well, obviously the difference between strategy and tactics is beyond you ^.......................................

White nations were weakened greatly by European infighting during the WWIIs, and the USSR propped up many of the post-colonial movements, as well as the USA often held back countries like England and France from reasserting themselves after WWII, an example like Suez(1956)

You know well that Napoleon won dozens of tactical victories, but he ultimately lost due to his strategic failings. Hitler won in France in 1940, but his lack of strategic planning for what he was going to do about England after the battle, as well as failing to destroy the BEF at Dunkirk, was the first step towards creating what would have been a stalemate had the war not extended to the USSR and USA. I don't mean to digress, but these are just examples of how one can theoretically win many tactical victories but fail in a larger strategic sense.

Besides, when you think about it, I think what happened was that America 'had nowhere to go but down.' When you've been #1 for so long, I think its possible to just get complacent and lose your will.

But anyway, sometimes Quantity DOES beat Quality. Sometimes a pure massed onrush, if it has such weight of numbers, will take the position and incur a tremendous amount of casualites. You look back through all of the white/non-white wars, even from the very advent of missile weapons, and you can find constant examples of the non-white party incurring tremendous punishment, but still carrying the day against a smaller white contingent. And this was not always due to 'superior weaponry' either, at least not until the 1800's really.

Blacks are winning now because white leaders trip over themselves to show how tolerant they are, and are very very accommodating. As I said too, the minorities have had loads of recent help from the USSR, Communist China, tolerant white and Jewish liberals, etc.

(dup post.)