Feminism vs. Equality
Bethie
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age:27
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Bethie wrote:
I'm a radical feminist and my ultimate dream is to be a stay at home mom
married to an older, wiser man.
That's just a fantasy, though.
Please , read my post on page 1.
It is this *fantasy* which is holding your gender back now.
I thought that the ultimate goal of radical feminism is the abolish of the patriarchal system and implying an egalitarian society instead.
By wishing an older, wiser man as an ultimate dream, you're just enforcing the system that your movement claims to be against.
No part of wanting an older wiser man involves someone wielding authority over me,
let alone for the explicit reason that I am female and he is male.
_________________
For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay.
Last edited by Bethie on 30 Mar 2011, 11:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Bethie
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age:27
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
"I've never been able to find out precisely what feminism is. I only know that people call me a feminist whenever I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat." -Rebecca West
The original quote read "from a doormat or a prostitute".
It's very interesting to me why the last 3 words are often omitted....
_________________
For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay.
ikorack wrote:
LKL wrote:
ikorack wrote:
I question why you are defending an institution which encourages traditional gender roles.
WTF?
Have you been reading anything I've written?
Other readers, do you also have the impression that I have been "defending an institution that encourages traditional gender roles," or have I actually gotten my point across to people other than Ikorack?
Custody laws reward the person who follows the traditional female role with custody, and this does indeed seem to be a law your defending, feel free to correct me. Do you have a problem with my other statements?
MotherKnowsBest wrote:
ikorack wrote:
LKL wrote:
@Ikorack: It was somewhere in the mess of what I read. It's possible that it was in an article that I chose not to post. Just out of curiosity, do you honestly think that an average wife in the 1950's could have asked her husband for more help with the cooking/dishes/cleaning/child care and gotten, 'sure, honey!,' even if she also worked full time? And if she did get that answer, would he feel comfortable, or even proud, to tell his men-friends that he was helping his wife around the house for more equal labor division?
What does that question have to do with anything? I am not objecting to every affect feminism has had on us, I am objecting to their lack of involvement in men's rights as it pertains to their original egalitarians goals. You still have not come up with a coherent statement against my last argument(The one which uses your sources). Nor with my statements against the lack of lobbying for equal parenting from feminist groups and individuals. The fact that men and women are now expecting an equal division of labor is a positive effect of feminism but it does not justify the stall in(or lack of) lobbying for shared parenting from feminists. I question why you are defending an institution which encourages traditional gender roles.
That's because you are ignoring posts which don't suit your position. As I have already pointed out, look at countries that are further advanced along the feminist path and you will see a more equal division of roles.
Like Sweden, with it's closed rape trials? Feminism just won't work without a male counter group to balance out privileges, which I suppose is my opinion. What other countries would you like me to look at?
As I said, you disregard anything which doesn't support you. The fact is Sweden is the most advanced country with regards to feminism. Another fact is that improved equality for women in Sweden has resulted in more equality for men. A further fact is that because of Swedish feminist progession parenting is split 50:50, before and after divorce. But please, continue to ignore those facts in favour of your own agenda.
ikorack wrote:
Yes it is also increasing in America, albeit slowly(I think it was 2% over either 2,5, or 10 years I can't remember right now), they don't list how fast it is going up in Canada however nor what percentage of single father households are a result of court decisions.
http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolo ... 098ac86075
Times Columnist and Canwest News Service wrote:
Most of Canada’s lone-parent families in 2006 were made up of women and their children, but single fathers are picking up the pace, according to the most recent census data released Wednesday.
In 2006, there were 1.4 million single-parent families, in 80 per cent of them, women were the head of the household. That leaves about 20 per cent where men were parenting on their own — and their numbers are rising.
Between 2001 and 2006, lone-father families rose by 14.6 per cent, more than twice the pace of 6.3 per cent for families headed by single mothers.
In 2006, there were 1.4 million single-parent families, in 80 per cent of them, women were the head of the household. That leaves about 20 per cent where men were parenting on their own — and their numbers are rising.
Between 2001 and 2006, lone-father families rose by 14.6 per cent, more than twice the pace of 6.3 per cent for families headed by single mothers.
Bethie wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
"I've never been able to find out precisely what feminism is. I only know that people call me a feminist whenever I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat." -Rebecca West
The original quote read "from a doormat or a prostitute".
It's very interesting to me why the last 3 words are often omitted....
I did not know that, but you're right. It is an interesting point. One would think those last 3 words to be important since they convey the two extremes expected of women for so long.
Perhaps they are omitted more often than not because many confuse sexual prowess with feminism.
_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.
LKL wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
Bethie wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
And what are you referring to? Awareness raising? Affirmative action?
I'm referring to people and groups deliberately advocating that what they see as injustices be addressed.
No?
How about this?
http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2011/ ... index.html
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/03/16/r ... gang-rape/
http://www.alternet.org/rss/1/513829/11 ... &rd=1&t=13
or this?
http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2008/11/06/somalia
or this?
http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/fe ... _at_school
or this?
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/artic ... 10,00.html
http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010/01/26/13 ... ary-raped/
http://articles.cnn.com/2008-07-31/us/m ... e?_s=PM:US
That's just a few minutes' search on the rather narrow topic of rape. I could keep going.
Sexual harassment is a vague term that could range from an as*hole who doesn't know what "no" means to just being a drama queen. Also, what type of women did they poll? Those with PTSD? Every woman in the military? If it's just those with PTSD, then it would only prove 1/3 of women with PTSD in the military have been raped. I have a feeling there's some cluster sampling going on here.
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
It is quite normal to blame the victim of rape. Even an 11 year old. It's even got a name... Victim Blame.
I know for a fact women can get blamed but this is actually the first time I've heard about a little girl being blamed for rape. Either way it's f*****g stupid. A low cut dress doesn't entice a normal person into rape. A rapist is usually an as*hole in all aspects of his life, not just his sexual life.
AceOfSpades wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
It is quite normal to blame the victim of rape. Even an 11 year old. It's even got a name... Victim Blame.
I know for a fact women can get blamed but this is actually the first time I've heard about a little girl being blamed for rape. Either way it's f***ing stupid. A low cut dress doesn't entice a normal person into rape. A rapist is usually an as*hole in all aspects of his life, not just his sexual life.I can tell you from personal experience and research that little girls are often blamed for their own sexual assaults. It's only been in recent years that it's been considered wrong.
I agree with everything else you said, though. Clothes have very little to do with someone's rape. It's availability.
_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.
Quote:
MotherKnowsBest wrote:
MotherKnowsBest wrote:
ikorack wrote:
LKL wrote:
@Ikorack: It was somewhere in the mess of what I read. It's possible that it was in an article that I chose not to post. Just out of curiosity, do you honestly think that an average wife in the 1950's could have asked her husband for more help with the cooking/dishes/cleaning/child care and gotten, 'sure, honey!,' even if she also worked full time? And if she did get that answer, would he feel comfortable, or even proud, to tell his men-friends that he was helping his wife around the house for more equal labor division?
What does that question have to do with anything? I am not objecting to every affect feminism has had on us, I am objecting to their lack of involvement in men's rights as it pertains to their original egalitarians goals. You still have not come up with a coherent statement against my last argument(The one which uses your sources). Nor with my statements against the lack of lobbying for equal parenting from feminist groups and individuals. The fact that men and women are now expecting an equal division of labor is a positive effect of feminism but it does not justify the stall in(or lack of) lobbying for shared parenting from feminists. I question why you are defending an institution which encourages traditional gender roles.
That's because you are ignoring posts which don't suit your position. As I have already pointed out, look at countries that are further advanced along the feminist path and you will see a more equal division of roles.
Like Sweden, with it's closed rape trials? Feminism just won't work without a male counter group to balance out privileges, which I suppose is my opinion. What other countries would you like me to look at?
As I said, you disregard anything which doesn't support you. The fact is Sweden is the most advanced country with regards to feminism. Another fact is that improved equality for women in Sweden has resulted in more equality for men. A further fact is that because of Swedish feminist progession parenting is split 50:50, before and after divorce. But please, continue to ignore those facts in favour of your own agenda.
How are closed rape trials equal, there have been suggestions(and serious discussion, see Link, the dissenting opinion of I think two sentences was soundly twisted into support) for gender quotas(How is that equal?), as well as a suggested man tax(Which was deemed radical and soundly tossed out.). And I have asked you for other countries to look at. Now tell me what equality men have achieved aside from paternity leave in Sweden, show me other examples of equality in Sweden and do so from the male perspective, Because so far all you've done is parrot one example.
EDIT: There is a link near the bottom which I suppose is part of this argument.
Also See wrote:
On July 1st last year an amendment was made to the law against discrimination, specifically banning gender discrimination. This has led to a rapid rise in the number of incidents reported by men, who were previously under-represented.
Of 56 cases reported under the new amendment, 45 concerned complaints made by men. Added to a series of complaints under the previous legislation, Jämo is now handling a total of 82 incidents reported by men in 2005, compared to just 23 the year before.
The complaints include different age restrictions for men and women for entry into bars and higher prices for dating services.
13 complaints concern Sweden's social services, labour market policies and unemployment benefits. However, none of them has yet been brought before the courts.
In total, Jämo received 235 reports of discrimination last year under the three laws which the ombudsman is responsible for supervising.
171 of those complaints were made with reference to equality legislation. 65 incidents concerned employment conditions, usually salary. That is a marked increase on the year before when only 36 such matters were reported.
Most cases still centre on women who are dissatisfied with wage differences in their workplace.
The next largest category, with 55 complaints in 2005, deals with companies' recruitment procedures.
Trial periods cut short, dismissals and transfers accounted for 27 complaints, which included cases of women who were not able to return to continue their work due to pregnancy.
Jämo closed 197 cases last year. In 79 of those the conclusion was that there was no discrimination - or no evidence of it.
Four cases were brought before the labour courts. Jämo won three of those and lost a case where a female employee of the army claimed to have been bullied by her colleagues.
Of 56 cases reported under the new amendment, 45 concerned complaints made by men. Added to a series of complaints under the previous legislation, Jämo is now handling a total of 82 incidents reported by men in 2005, compared to just 23 the year before.
The complaints include different age restrictions for men and women for entry into bars and higher prices for dating services.
13 complaints concern Sweden's social services, labour market policies and unemployment benefits. However, none of them has yet been brought before the courts.
In total, Jämo received 235 reports of discrimination last year under the three laws which the ombudsman is responsible for supervising.
171 of those complaints were made with reference to equality legislation. 65 incidents concerned employment conditions, usually salary. That is a marked increase on the year before when only 36 such matters were reported.
Most cases still centre on women who are dissatisfied with wage differences in their workplace.
The next largest category, with 55 complaints in 2005, deals with companies' recruitment procedures.
Trial periods cut short, dismissals and transfers accounted for 27 complaints, which included cases of women who were not able to return to continue their work due to pregnancy.
Jämo closed 197 cases last year. In 79 of those the conclusion was that there was no discrimination - or no evidence of it.
Four cases were brought before the labour courts. Jämo won three of those and lost a case where a female employee of the army claimed to have been bullied by her colleagues.
http://www.thelocal.se/article.php?ID=2 ... e=20060203 (The above)
And
http://www.thelocal.se/19376/20090511 Concerning Swedish rape law and how the word rape has been redefined.(Although apparently the swedes themselves understand the differences)
To see a more critical article
http://sunnysinghonline.blogspot.com/20 ... women.html
http://www.freewebs.com/feminism-evaluated/ (Mark, < This is so I can find and read more of it later)
^led me to, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/feminist Definition one matches the 'correct' definition of feminism, definition two does not. 2. organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests
http://allnurses-central.com/world-news ... 98953.html (this one had me laughing)
http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blog ... irl-power/
http://www.australian-news.com.au/domes ... _Falls.htm (Just stumbled on this not really relevant to the discussion though.)
http://theantifeminist.com/swedish-dad- ... ce-system/ (This contradicts your equal parenting claim. I can't remember if you said you were Swedish or not, do you have sources to back up your equal parenting claims? Keep in mind the this would include custody after divorce)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fathers%27 ... try#Sweden
If the sources(of the wiki link) check out Sweden cannot be called an equal parenting state.
Last edited by ikorack on 30 Mar 2011, 2:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Women deserve equality in all respects. And the men here should be aware, happy women = happy men ![]()
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
How are closed rape trials an example of inequality? Aren't they closed to protect the victim?
Justice cannot be done in the shadows, and men are the primary defendants in rape trials. How does a closed trial protect the alleged victim?
EDIt Fixed some wording, also even if you can argue that it does protect the alleged victim in some way how does the justify a trial done without public accountability.
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Mini skirts, feminism and equality |
12 Nov 2013, 10:11 am |
| Sex Positive feminism vs anti pornography feminism! |
19 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm |
| feminism=/=radical feminism |
23 May 2014, 1:48 am |
| Equality=not for me |
29 Nov 2012, 9:35 am |
