Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Why haven't extraterrestrials made their presence known?

Page 4 of 14 [ 207 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 14  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Why haven't aliens made themselves known to us en masse?
They actually have but most people refuse to accept it 23%  23%  [ 18 ]
They think we are not ready for it 4%  4%  [ 3 ]
They think we are cruel/violent and don't deserve to know 9%  9%  [ 7 ]
They have a reason not to disclose that is unclear 6%  6%  [ 5 ]
Aliens have never visited Earth silly 57%  57%  [ 44 ]
Total votes : 77

shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age:50
Posts: 3,355
Location: OK let's go.

04 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm

Plain and simple, we just don't know.

It's funny how people will project chances of existence for benevolent aliens off the Earth, but scoff at any chance of a benevolent god off the Earth.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age:78
Posts: 31,726
Location: New Jersey

04 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm

shrox wrote:
Plain and simple, we just don't know.

It's funny how people will project chances of existence for benevolent aliens off the Earth, but scoff at any chance of a benevolent god off the Earth.


Here is something we know. There is not an iota of evidence indicating the non-terrestrials are here or have ever been here. Not a bit of evidence.

ruveyn



abacacus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Age:23
Posts: 3,380

04 Feb 2012, 6:09 pm

ruveyn wrote:
shrox wrote:
Plain and simple, we just don't know.

It's funny how people will project chances of existence for benevolent aliens off the Earth, but scoff at any chance of a benevolent god off the Earth.


Here is something we know. There is not an iota of evidence indicating the non-terrestrials are here or have ever been here. Not a bit of evidence.

ruveyn


Reliable evidence at any rate.

Some people will wax lyrical about their "evidence" supporting alien visitation.


_________________
A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown.


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age:115
Posts: 25,932
Location: Stendec

04 Feb 2012, 10:23 pm

snapcap wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Oodain wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Space travel doesn't occur until Tech Level 6. Interstellar Travel doesn't appear until Tech Level 8. We're currently at Tech Level 7.
depends on the scale,

I use the Miller scale. But I made a mistake. I was off by one point in two of the categories. Here are the correct values: Space travel doesn't occur until Tech Level 7. Interstellar Travel doesn't appear until Tech Level 9. We're currently at Tech Level 7.
What's that got to do with the Miller Scale?Miller Scale

That's the wrong Miller Scale.



simon_says
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Posts: 3,200

05 Feb 2012, 1:18 am

shrox wrote:
Plain and simple, we just don't know.

It's funny how people will project chances of existence for benevolent aliens off the Earth, but scoff at any chance of a benevolent god off the Earth.


I know life emerged on at least one planet and I know the universe is a very big place.

But Ive never seen a god or elf. Not one.



Declension
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2012
Age:27
Posts: 1,880

05 Feb 2012, 1:39 am

shrox wrote:
It's funny how people will project chances of existence for benevolent aliens off the Earth, but scoff at any chance of a benevolent god off the Earth.


We know that lifeforms exist, and we understand (roughly) how lifeforms come into existence. There is no reason to think that it couldn't happen elsewhere.

We don't know that gods exist, and we certainly don't know anything about them even if they do exist.



TM
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2012
Age:32
Posts: 2,122

05 Feb 2012, 10:34 am

shrox wrote:
Plain and simple, we just don't know.

It's funny how people will project chances of existence for benevolent aliens off the Earth, but scoff at any chance of a benevolent god off the Earth.


The idea of a benevolent god doesn't "work" with the Earth we live on. If we use the Christian god with the characteristics of omni-benevolence, omnipotence and omniscience, these characteristics are inconsistent with the Earth on which we live, therefore such a god does not exist. Now, a benevolent god without omnipotence and omniscience is plausible, or rather cannot be refuted in the same manner, however without the power to do benevolent actions or the power to see where they are required at all times, that is not a being worthy of being called a god.

The idea of benevolent aliens is, believe it or not more plausible given the amount of planets that exist.



shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age:50
Posts: 3,355
Location: OK let's go.

05 Feb 2012, 12:15 pm

TM wrote:
shrox wrote:
Plain and simple, we just don't know.

It's funny how people will project chances of existence for benevolent aliens off the Earth, but scoff at any chance of a benevolent god off the Earth.


The idea of a benevolent god doesn't "work" with the Earth we live on. If we use the Christian god with the characteristics of omni-benevolence, omnipotence and omniscience, these characteristics are inconsistent with the Earth on which we live, therefore such a god does not exist. Now, a benevolent god without omnipotence and omniscience is plausible, or rather cannot be refuted in the same manner, however without the power to do benevolent actions or the power to see where they are required at all times, that is not a being worthy of being called a god.

The idea of benevolent aliens is, believe it or not more plausible given the amount of planets that exist.


Did I say Christian god?



Jono
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Age:35
Posts: 4,934
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

05 Feb 2012, 12:32 pm

AspieRogue wrote:
Furthermore, the massive galaxy M87 has a jet of matter spewing out of its center that appears to be moving 6-8 times the speed of light. Some astrophysicists try to explain this away as an optical illusion caused by the curvature of space-time around the galaxy itself; but even that explanation is problematic because special relativity predicts that nothing can even appear to move faster than light since the speed of light is a universal reference frame in its own right!


Not some astrophysicists but all of them agree that this is an illusion but it's not due to the curvature of space-time. The jet is actually moving slower than light and is therefore not superluminal. In fact, no experiment or observation has ever shown anything to be traveling faster than light, other than the recent OPERA experiment at CERN which has yet to be verified.



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age:48
Posts: 6,085
Location: Vancouver, BC

06 Feb 2012, 12:02 pm

Think about the amount of effort and resources that are required to travel interstellar distances, and to return home within anything like a reasonable timeframe.

No society has infinite resources, so every society must make choices about the uses to which those resources are put. Rational decision making will always favour the expenditure of reources that creates the best benefit. So what's the benefit of visiting this planet? Or indeed any planet?

If you can bring back more resources than it cost you to get there--all to the good.
If you can find a place to relocate your population, that might be necessary.

But the likelihood of either of these circumstances is remote, and the number of planets that such an expedition might visit so large that the possibility that extraterrestrial visitors have been here is slim to nil.


_________________
--James


Burzum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Age:24
Posts: 1,205

06 Feb 2012, 12:08 pm

I don't know. Why haven't you made your presence known to that ant nest out in the middle of the Arizona desert?



simon_says
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Posts: 3,200

06 Feb 2012, 12:17 pm

visagrunt wrote:
Think about the amount of effort and resources that are required to travel interstellar distances, and to return home within anything like a reasonable timeframe.

No society has infinite resources, so every society must make choices about the uses to which those resources are put. Rational decision making will always favour the expenditure of reources that creates the best benefit. So what's the benefit of visiting this planet? Or indeed any planet?

If you can bring back more resources than it cost you to get there--all to the good.
If you can find a place to relocate your population, that might be necessary.

But the likelihood of either of these circumstances is remote, and the number of planets that such an expedition might visit so large that the possibility that extraterrestrial visitors have been here is slim to nil.



Investments are relative. It took resources to send the Voyager probes, which are just now leaving our solar system. To an ancient culture that was an unimaginable investment in time, wealth and knowledge. But that was just a tiny drop in the bucket to a 20th century economy. As technology advances it's difficult to predict costs for a given activity.

As for destinations. I think it would be unlikely to be a random visit. Just as NASA is looking for Earth like environments it's not difficult to imagine 02 based life looking for places like Earth. They'd see them from far away without having to visit. Assuming they exist.



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age:25
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

06 Feb 2012, 12:28 pm

o2 based life forms??
how do they look?

usually you class life by its common conector, carbon in our case, silicon is possible,
oxygen seems like it would be too reactive to create the base of life, a vuital component to some life, certainly.


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age:50
Posts: 3,355
Location: OK let's go.

06 Feb 2012, 12:33 pm

Burzum wrote:
I don't know. Why haven't you made your presence known to that ant nest out in the middle of the Arizona desert?


Earth has been broadcasting our presence since the invention of radio. Television broadcasts practically makes us glow.



simon_says
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Posts: 3,200

06 Feb 2012, 12:39 pm

Oodain wrote:
o2 based life forms??
how do they look?

usually you class life by its common conector, carbon in our case, silicon is possible,
oxygen seems like it would be too reactive to create the base of life, a vuital component to some life, certainly.


Meaning they breathe O2. The point is that life of one type will naturally look for the habitats of similar life, as NASA is doing. A search for life wouldnt be random visits to random rocks.