Page 13 of 13 [ 194 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

NAKnight
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2012
Age:22
Posts: 387
Location: Gitmo Nation Elvis

04 Dec 2012, 4:33 pm

Janissy wrote:
That's why posters have been trying so hard to get you to disentangle "value" from "fact".


Janissy wrote:
. But those values and rules don't have anything to do with figuring out how life and matter actually operates


Not true Actually they do, they determine, what/why/how people believe what they believe. Those values and "rules" determine many things on how life and matter actually operate because they set an objective standard. Otherwise, man would drift aimlessly through life in a deterministic, moral relativistic life.

GGPViper wrote:
Why do you continue to describe atheism as a value system when it is only an absence of belief?


Because every human has values you as a person base your decisions on those values. You decide what is factual and opinion based upon those values. That's the connection between value and fact.

I can decide to be an Atheist simply because it agrees with my values and facts that I choose to adhere to. It isn't just an absence of belief, that's superficial.

My point is this; Atheism is a belief and value system because the person chooses to not to believe in a "Deity" and associates their values with that.
Calling Atheism not a belief system or a lack of belief is a statement that does not hold water. It is a belief system, the belief system of not believing is the belief system. It ties along with your values of non-belief. And those values that you cherish, along with non-belief is the foundation for your belief system and value system.


You can choose not to decide, but you still have made a choice




Best Regards,

Jake


_________________
In The Morning to all Hams on the air, ships at sea, boots on the grounds, drones in the sky and all the Human Resources charged up and ready to go just the way the Government wants you to be..


Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age:48
Posts: 6,508

04 Dec 2012, 6:48 pm

NAKnight wrote:
Janissy wrote:
That's why posters have been trying so hard to get you to disentangle "value" from "fact".


Janissy wrote:
. But those values and rules don't have anything to do with figuring out how life and matter actually operates


Not true Actually they do, they determine, what/why/how people believe what they believe. Those values and "rules" determine many things on how life and matter actually operate because they set an objective standard. Otherwise, man would drift aimlessly through life in a deterministic, moral relativistic life.





The values and rules determine how people interact with each other and interact with the enviroment. But that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about how life and matter operate. The way living organisms operate and evolved (all living organisms, not just people), the physical laws that govern the universe. Human values have no effect on these things. The values and rules aren't objective. They are just methods people have devised in order to get along with each other. But I'm talking about the actual facts about such things as gravity, how organisms live in their enviroments and how they evolve, what else there is in the universe besides earth and so on. None of those subjects have anything to do with humans or human values and religion is useless for figuring out anything about them. All atheism is is relying on science, rather than religion, as a way of figuring out how these things all work together.

Human values have nothing at all to do with figuring out what is beyond our solar system and how life evolved. Human values and religion can't explain why the earth goes around the sun instead of vice versa. Talking about God doesn't help anyone solve that problem. (I know that particular puzzle got solved long ago. I'm just using it as an example.) Atheism isn't a belief system. It's just acknowledging that talking about the existence or non-existence of God is irrelevent when you are trying to figure out how the universe and life actually works.



Last edited by Janissy on 04 Dec 2012, 6:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

NAKnight
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2012
Age:22
Posts: 387
Location: Gitmo Nation Elvis

04 Dec 2012, 6:49 pm

NAKnight wrote:
Janissy wrote:
That's why posters have been trying so hard to get you to disentangle "value" from "fact".


Janissy wrote:
. But those values and rules don't have anything to do with figuring out how life and matter actually operates


Not true Actually they do, they determine, what/why/how people believe what they believe. Those values and "rules" determine many things on how life and matter actually operate because they set an objective standard. Otherwise, man would drift aimlessly through life in a deterministic, moral relativistic life.

GGPViper wrote:
Why do you continue to describe atheism as a value system when it is only an absence of belief?


Because every human has values you as a person base your decisions on those values. You decide what is factual and opinion based upon those values. That's the connection between value and fact.

[quote=Oodain]
again there is plenty of points that you quite simply have refused to even acknowledge and instead responded with logical loops or non sequiters.


Or maybe your choosing not to agree with me because it doesn't agree with your values?


I can decide to be an Atheist simply because it agrees with my values and facts that I choose to adhere to. It isn't just an absence of belief, that's superficial.

My point is this; Atheism is a belief and value system because the person chooses to not to believe in a "Deity" and associates their values with that.
Calling Atheism not a belief system or a lack of belief is a statement that does not hold water. It is a belief system, the belief system of not believing is the belief system. It ties along with your values of non-belief. And those values that you cherish, along with non-belief is the foundation for your belief system and value system.


You can choose not to decide, but you still have made a choice




Best Regards,

Jake[/quote]


_________________
In The Morning to all Hams on the air, ships at sea, boots on the grounds, drones in the sky and all the Human Resources charged up and ready to go just the way the Government wants you to be..


NAKnight
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2012
Age:22
Posts: 387
Location: Gitmo Nation Elvis

04 Dec 2012, 6:49 pm

Janissy wrote:
That's why posters have been trying so hard to get you to disentangle "value" from "fact".


Janissy wrote:
. But those values and rules don't have anything to do with figuring out how life and matter actually operates


Not true Actually they do, they determine, what/why/how people believe what they believe. Those values and "rules" determine many things on how life and matter actually operate because they set an objective standard. Otherwise, man would drift aimlessly through life in a deterministic, moral relativistic life.

GGPViper wrote:
Why do you continue to describe atheism as a value system when it is only an absence of belief?


Because every human has values you as a person base your decisions on those values. You decide what is factual and opinion based upon those values. That's the connection between value and fact.

Oodain wrote:
again there is plenty of points that you quite simply have refused to even acknowledge and instead responded with logical loops or non sequiters.


Or maybe your choosing not to agree with me because it doesn't agree with your values?


I can decide to be an Atheist simply because it agrees with my values and facts that I choose to adhere to. It isn't just an absence of belief, that's superficial.

My point is this; Atheism is a belief and value system because the person chooses to not to believe in a "Deity" and associates their values with that.
Calling Atheism not a belief system or a lack of belief is a statement that does not hold water. It is a belief system, the belief system of not believing is the belief system. It ties along with your values of non-belief. And those values that you cherish, along with non-belief is the foundation for your belief system and value system.


You can choose not to decide, but you still have made a choice




Best Regards,

Jake


_________________
In The Morning to all Hams on the air, ships at sea, boots on the grounds, drones in the sky and all the Human Resources charged up and ready to go just the way the Government wants you to be..


Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age:25
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

04 Dec 2012, 6:57 pm

it is not that i dont agree, it is that in many of those arguments there is nothing to agree to, it isnt even internally consistent.
which is what people are saying to you, logic is not a value and value has no impact on logic, so when the logic fails people can per defintion tell you are wrong, that is a fallacy.


on a completely different note; what happened with the extra posts?


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age:48
Posts: 6,508

04 Dec 2012, 7:02 pm

NAKnight wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
]
Why do you continue to describe atheism as a value system when it is only an absence of belief?


Because every human has values you as a person base your decisions on those values. You decide what is factual and opinion based upon those values. That's the connection between value and fact.


I don't think people use their value systems to differentiate opinion from fact. I say this because people with markedly different value systems will agree on facts if they have the same incoming data. What they will disagree on is how to interpret those facts. Science is about trying to figure out what exactly the facts are. This is completely independent of values. A accurate list of the components of an atom is a fact. Deciding whether or not to build and use an atomic bomb once you have that knowledge is a value. Facts are independent of values.



NAKnight
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2012
Age:22
Posts: 387
Location: Gitmo Nation Elvis

04 Dec 2012, 7:10 pm

Oodain wrote:
it is not that i dont agree, it is that in many of those arguments there is nothing to agree to,


I was explaining more than arguing.


Best Regards,

Jake


_________________
In The Morning to all Hams on the air, ships at sea, boots on the grounds, drones in the sky and all the Human Resources charged up and ready to go just the way the Government wants you to be..


NAKnight
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2012
Age:22
Posts: 387
Location: Gitmo Nation Elvis

04 Dec 2012, 7:15 pm

GGPViper wrote:
I don't think people use their value systems to differentiate opinion from fact.


When you decide your next phrase or statement, you will use your values as a reference.
If I say "The sky is red" I'm forcing my fact to force your hand, either you speak up and say that that statement is clearly wrong and use your values as a reference or I hold my case that, yes. People do use values to differentiate opinion. What's the alternative? Do they just pick a topic they agree with and stick with it?

Best Regards,

Jake


_________________
In The Morning to all Hams on the air, ships at sea, boots on the grounds, drones in the sky and all the Human Resources charged up and ready to go just the way the Government wants you to be..


abacacus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Age:23
Posts: 3,380

04 Dec 2012, 7:23 pm

NAKnight wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
I don't think people use their value systems to differentiate opinion from fact.


When you decide your next phrase or statement, you will use your values as a reference.
If I say "The sky is red" I'm forcing my fact to force your hand, either you speak up and say that that statement is clearly wrong and use your values as a reference or I hold my case that, yes. People do use values to differentiate opinion. What's the alternative? Do they just pick a topic they agree with and stick with it?

Best Regards,

Jake


Uh... what? I'm sorry, but laughing at someone who is stupid, ignorant, or insane enough to say "the sky is red" and then correcting them is not a matter of values, beyond basic humour at any rate.


_________________
A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown.


Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age:48
Posts: 6,508

04 Dec 2012, 7:32 pm

NAKnight wrote:
Janissy wrote:
I don't think people use their value systems to differentiate opinion from fact.


When you decide your next phrase or statement, you will use your values as a reference.
If I say "The sky is red" I'm forcing my fact to force your hand, either you speak up and say that that statement is clearly wrong and use your values as a reference or I hold my case that, yes. People do use values to differentiate opinion. What's the alternative? Do they just pick a topic they agree with and stick with it?

Best Regards,

Jake


(I changed the quote from GGPViper to Janissy because it was actually me you were quoting. Embeddded quotes can get discombobulated.)

If you say the sky is red and I disagree and say that it is blue, we are disagreeing because we are not getting the same data incoming into our eyes (perhaps one of us is color blind- that changes the perception). But the objectivity of facts resides in how they can be measured. Light has a measurable wavelength. Our disagreement can be settled by objectively measuring the wavelength of the color. Neither of us is using values to determine the color of the sky. We're using data coming into our eyes to gauge the wavelength. If our eyes are sufficiently different from each other, we can use an instrument to measure the wavelength rather than relying on our eyes.

Facts rely on objective measurements, not on value systems. When two people disagree on a fact because their perceptual systems are different and therefore they are getting different sensory data (as in your example), an instrument can be used to take the measurement.



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age:25
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

04 Dec 2012, 7:34 pm

NAKnight wrote:
Oodain wrote:
it is not that i dont agree, it is that in many of those arguments there is nothing to agree to,


I was explaining more than arguing.


Best Regards,

Jake


you dont sem to understand what i am saying,

there was nothing to explain either,


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


NAKnight
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2012
Age:22
Posts: 387
Location: Gitmo Nation Elvis

04 Dec 2012, 7:48 pm

abacacus wrote:
Uh... what? I'm sorry, but laughing at someone who is stupid, ignorant, or insane enough to say "the sky is red" and then correcting them is not a matter of values, beyond basic humour at any rate.


Get mad, write down some derogatory words and give yourself satisfaction that you've "won"
All in all this is just a forum.

Best Regards,

Jake


_________________
In The Morning to all Hams on the air, ships at sea, boots on the grounds, drones in the sky and all the Human Resources charged up and ready to go just the way the Government wants you to be..


Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age:25
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

04 Dec 2012, 7:53 pm

again the only content in your previous post is condescension,

oh by the way nice sarcasm work on the avatar :wink:

the point while blunt is valid, fact is fact because it is independently verifiable, no value could ever be.


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


NAKnight
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2012
Age:22
Posts: 387
Location: Gitmo Nation Elvis

04 Dec 2012, 8:05 pm

Like I said, I'm done.

It's Just a Forum.


Best Regards,

Jake


_________________
In The Morning to all Hams on the air, ships at sea, boots on the grounds, drones in the sky and all the Human Resources charged up and ready to go just the way the Government wants you to be..