Page 2 of 3 [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age:45
Posts: 2,922

28 Dec 2013, 3:56 pm

I would say all people are born with an asexual nature. There is absolutely no need for a newborn baby to have a sexuality.

I believe sexuality develops throughout childhood. The child "learns" his or her preferences subconsciously, perhaps in the same way a person learns to talk, or to eat, but over a longer time period. I think some people do not learn their sexuality until late in life, some learn it very early.

However, it does appear that some people have a predisposition to their sexuality, and perhaps this is genetic, so maybe in some people their "learning" of their sexuality is dictated by their genetic make up.

Gay adoption is fine by me, but let us not forget that gay couples are no more likely to be loving and consistent with their children than any given straight couple. So it is up to the authorities to determine the safest environment for the child.



babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age:42
Posts: 40,016
Location: Top deck of the funny bus....blowing bubbles

28 Dec 2013, 4:09 pm

I don't think anyone should have the rights to adopt a child, no matter who they are or what shenanigans they get up to.


_________________
I can't say that I have ever shat on my own doorstep.

Woof Woof! Cheep Cheep!


Mamselle
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Age:50
Posts: 131

28 Dec 2013, 4:13 pm

TheValk wrote:
It doesn't have to be a 100% guaranteed relation. We do know homosexual behaviour was practised as a normal phenomenon in certain cultures in the past (Antique Greece being one), so a society can definitely affect whom people will choose to have intercourse with. I don't buy the claim that one is born with it.


Maybe some people choose to live a homosexual life, but I have never met one who claimed that. The gays and lesbians I know came to their identity the same as I did mine: they always felt drawn to the same gender and while some of them tried to suppress it by getting married and becoming parents, all of them--every single one--ended up divorced and coming out of the closet.

Arguing about whether it's born or chosen is silly anyway. Discriminating against people because of their sexual orientation is bigoted. No way around that. A gay or lesbian couple should be equal in consideration to a straight couple when it comes to adopting children. The love they offer is the same.



TheValk
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2012
Age:27
Posts: 712

28 Dec 2013, 4:30 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
But how many of those people with homosexual dispositions who lived as straights their whole lives did so only because they were afraid to express who they really were? One of my oldest friends, who had also been the best man at my wedding, had lived the greater part of his life pretending to be straight because of his conservative Catholic upbringing. He had collected straight porn magazines strategically placed for his parents to be aware of, and had even had sex with women from time to time. But all that time he was fully aware of his own same sex preferences, developing a drinking problem while trying to cope with his depression that had grown out of his attempts to hide it. Today, he is out of the closet, very happy, and has not touched a drop in years.


I think this is a similar issue as the question about whether a person deserves credit for one's chastity if they have no choice about what lifestyle they would want to lead. Is it more important to be free or to ensure all people exhibit a certain kind of behaviour? I honestly don't know, but I've always felt that only acting in freedom gives your action their value.

Much like I don't see how acting upon heterosexual urges leads to happiness (seems to be quite the opposite a lot of the time), I think "setting gay people free", while idealistic and sappy, also misses a part of the big trouble. Namely, that the huge lack of proportion between straight and gay people makes the risk of rejection and all related troubles and consequences (depression, substance abuse, suicide) far more likely, because the person you fall for will most likely not return that feeling. It seems to me an unfortunate reality that gay people have to suffer more than others one way or another, and I don't know why people choose to handwave this truth. What is said to prevent gay people from attaining their happiness seems to me a way to prevent them from suffering.

LouHusky wrote:
Why not 'Valk?

If it's not the case that some individuals are born as gay, then I'd be extremely interested to learn what influenced me as my dad apparently suspected I would turn out gay when I was still a toddler. I've been aware of my proclivities towards boys over girls since I was 5, but for years I kept it to myself. His sexuality wasn't the cause of it as for my first 3 years he was happily married to my mother before she took us away, it wasn't until several years later that he came out as bisexual. While I lived with mom I was brought up in the same devoutly Christian way that she had, forced to believe that anything other than being heterosexual was un-natural and against god's way. Mom hated that me and my brother have aspergers, I could never have told her that I liked boys, she would have hit the roof, and probably my bottom. Living with my dad and his partner haven't made me turn gay, it's made me happy and comfortable to be who I already was without the fear of being hated for being different.

Lou


I'm sorry to hear that your own mother is one of the people who will not tolerate your differences.

It's interesting that your father recognised you as being gay at such an early age (I do not think I had sexual or gender-based interest in the opposite sex until a good decade later in contrast), but you can probably agree that this kind of identification hardly points to the objective fact that sexuality is determined on birth. For example, I wouldn't say that you inherited your father's homosexuality either, even though one could connect the two in your particular life story.

My main objection to the claim that gays are born gay is related to the fact that sexuality isn't so straightforward, nor is it static. People slightly older than you experience this very often.

Also, I'm not sure if you've noticed this during your stay on this site, but it seems like a lot of autistics are assumed gay, regardless of whether they really are. This seems like a thing, too.

Robdemanc wrote:
Gay adoption is fine by me, but let us not forget that gay couples are no more likely to be loving and consistent with their children than any given straight couple. So it is up to the authorities to determine the safest environment for the child.


In a way, I'm sure that gay people would have the better statistics because they are (mostly) spared by the dreadful situations where they give birth to kids whom they don't want to have, cannot afford to support and don't care about. All three are prerequisites for adopting a child, and adoption is the most common for a gay couple to bring up a child, so it's quite natural that gay parents will be more caring.

Mamselle wrote:
Maybe some people choose to live a homosexual life, but I have never met one who claimed that. The gays and lesbians I know came to their identity the same as I did mine: they always felt drawn to the same gender and while some of them tried to suppress it by getting married and becoming parents, all of them--every single one--ended up divorced and coming out of the closet.


Perhaps the fact that they have come out of the closet is the reason why you've met such gay people? Because I've heard all kinds of stories and personal accounts, including ones of gay people moving on from failed (or successful) romance to choosing to stay celibate.

Choosing to live a homosexual life definitely appears to be a choice to me, though you could add such details as it is a natural choice to be made and that being disposed to liking the same sex makes it hard to resist, and so forth. Is it a choice for straight people who have never experienced the same urges? I would say not, as they have never faced the responsibility of making that particular decision.

Mamselle wrote:
Arguing about whether it's born or chosen is silly anyway. Discriminating against people because of their sexual orientation is bigoted. No way around that.


I absolutely agree that whether it's born or chosen has very little meaning, if any.

Mamselle wrote:
A gay or lesbian couple should be equal in consideration to a straight couple when it comes to adopting children. The love they offer is the same.


I've observed that gay people like talking about how the way they love should be distinguished from the love between a man and a woman. They seem to have some unwritten features in common and appear quite sectarian as a result, I would say.



ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Posts: 12,900

28 Dec 2013, 4:37 pm

babybird wrote:
I don't think anyone should have the rights to adopt a child, no matter who they are or what shenanigans they get up to.

Keep in mind there's no such thing as a perfect family but some are better than others. Two psychos, a male and female, are not ideal...



thomas81
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age:34
Posts: 5,434
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland

28 Dec 2013, 5:31 pm

babybird wrote:
I don't think anyone should have the rights to adopt a child, no matter who they are or what shenanigans they get up to.


but don't orphaned or neglected children deserve the right to a normal home and loving family?


_________________
Being 'normal' is over rated.

My deviant art profile


thomas81
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age:34
Posts: 5,434
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland

28 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm

Mamselle wrote:

Maybe some people choose to live a homosexual life,


Nobody chooses to live a life of ostracisation, being sneered at or being made a social stigma.

Do we really need to cite that episode of American dad again?


_________________
Being 'normal' is over rated.

My deviant art profile


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age:42
Posts: 40,016
Location: Top deck of the funny bus....blowing bubbles

28 Dec 2013, 5:45 pm

thomas81 wrote:
babybird wrote:
I don't think anyone should have the rights to adopt a child, no matter who they are or what shenanigans they get up to.


but don't orphaned or neglected children deserve the right to a normal home and loving family?


I was adopted and ended up back in care because it went wrong. I am bias. I suppose it can be good for some people and I wish them all the best, but it does scare me to think that a child can be adopted into an unsuitable family.


_________________
I can't say that I have ever shat on my own doorstep.

Woof Woof! Cheep Cheep!


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Posts: 12,900

28 Dec 2013, 5:51 pm

I do feel particularly sad when I think of those botched international adoptions where the people have no idea what they are getting into and very poor coping skills. They fail to understand once you bring that kid home, no matter where they are from, they are your family and you have to love them unconditionally. It is just like you birthed them yourself but even birth parents have the option of giving their child up for adoption if they choose.

People get into it unarmed with full knowledge.



LouHusky
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jan 2012
Age:14
Posts: 134
Location: Eagle River, Alaska

28 Dec 2013, 5:57 pm

TheValk wrote:
LouHusky wrote:
Why not 'Valk?

If it's not the case that some individuals are born as gay, then I'd be extremely interested to learn what influenced me as my dad apparently suspected I would turn out gay when I was still a toddler. I've been aware of my proclivities towards boys over girls since I was 5, but for years I kept it to myself. His sexuality wasn't the cause of it as for my first 3 years he was happily married to my mother before she took us away, it wasn't until several years later that he came out as bisexual. While I lived with mom I was brought up in the same devoutly Christian way that she had, forced to believe that anything other than being heterosexual was un-natural and against god's way. Mom hated that me and my brother have aspergers, I could never have told her that I liked boys, she would have hit the roof, and probably my bottom. Living with my dad and his partner haven't made me turn gay, it's made me happy and comfortable to be who I already was without the fear of being hated for being different.

Lou


I'm sorry to hear that your own mother is one of the people who will not tolerate your differences.

It's interesting that your father recognised you as being gay at such an early age (I do not think I had sexual or gender-based interest in the opposite sex until a good decade later in contrast), but you can probably agree that this kind of identification hardly points to the objective fact that sexuality is determined on birth. For example, I wouldn't say that you inherited your father's homosexuality either, even though one could connect the two in your particular life story.

My main objection to the claim that gays are born gay is related to the fact that sexuality isn't so straightforward, nor is it static. People slightly older than you experience this very often.

Also, I'm not sure if you've noticed this during your stay on this site, but it seems like a lot of autistics are assumed gay, regardless of whether they really are. This seems like a thing, too.


Mom's intolerance is no-longer a problem, she's been dead for 3 months.

I realise this is certainly not unequivocal proof that sexuality is determined at birth, but like Robdemanc says I believe there is some genetic pre-disposition that makes it more or less likely that said child will turn out gay. Like me, my dad knew from a young age that he had proclivities towards the same-sex more than the opposite, but rather than accept it, he vehemently denied it and knocked-up the school bike at 14. I don't think I inherited his sexuality, but if it is the case that there can be a genetic cause then the shoe certainly fits.

I know it's not all black and white and over the next few years I'm probably going to feel differently to how I do now, I'm in no hurry to act on any of my urges, and unlike my dad, I plan on keeping my penis in my pants.

It's honestly not something I've paid a great deal of attention to, I had noticed it, but hadn't really thought any more of it. I know it's not the case for all youngsters on the spectrum as my younger brother Levi doesn't give off any inkling of effeminism, nor has he been assumed to be homosexual.

Lou


_________________
Yarf~


LouHusky
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jan 2012
Age:14
Posts: 134
Location: Eagle River, Alaska

28 Dec 2013, 6:09 pm

It entirely depends on the circumstances leading to the child entering the adoption system that should determine which families are suitable, however I don't believe that there are many circumstances which would stop a homosexual couple being chosen as a suitable adopted family. If the child had suffered sexual assault at the hands of someone of the same sex then that would be reasonable grounds to look for a heterosexual couple to adopt him/her, but it's still no guarantee that further harm won't come to said child. In the end every child simply needs to be loved, cared for, clothed, housed and fed, and that can come from a homosexual couple just as easily as it can from a heterosexual couple.

Lou


_________________
Yarf~


Mamselle
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Age:50
Posts: 131

28 Dec 2013, 10:12 pm

TheValk wrote:
Mamselle wrote:
Maybe some people choose to live a homosexual life, but I have never met one who claimed that. The gays and lesbians I know came to their identity the same as I did mine: they always felt drawn to the same gender and while some of them tried to suppress it by getting married and becoming parents, all of them--every single one--ended up divorced and coming out of the closet.


Perhaps the fact that they have come out of the closet is the reason why you've met such gay people? Because I've heard all kinds of stories and personal accounts, including ones of gay people moving on from failed (or successful) romance to choosing to stay celibate.

Choosing to live a homosexual life definitely appears to be a choice to me, though you could add such details as it is a natural choice to be made and that being disposed to liking the same sex makes it hard to resist, and so forth. Is it a choice for straight people who have never experienced the same urges? I would say not, as they have never faced the responsibility of making that particular decision.


A gay person who ends a romantic relationship (voluntarily or involuntarily) and then remains celibate is not altering his or her sexuality. If I am celibate that doesn't mean I'm not straight anymore. It just means I'm celibate. And while celibacy may be an empowering state for some (I've enjoyed periods in my life since my divorce where I was voluntarily celibate), it is not a state that should be advocated for ten percent of the population as a lifelong situation just because they're afraid of getting hurt in a relationship, or because their sexuality makes straight people uncomfortable.

TheValk wrote:
Mamselle wrote:
Arguing about whether it's born or chosen is silly anyway. Discriminating against people because of their sexual orientation is bigoted. No way around that.


I absolutely agree that whether it's born or chosen has very little meaning, if any.

Mamselle wrote:
A gay or lesbian couple should be equal in consideration to a straight couple when it comes to adopting children. The love they offer is the same.


I've observed that gay people like talking about how the way they love should be distinguished from the love between a man and a woman. They seem to have some unwritten features in common and appear quite sectarian as a result, I would say.


Again, I don't know any gay men or lesbians who think their love is any different from the love between a man and a woman. If anything, they insist that it is exactly the same and therefore should not be treated any differently.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Age:49
Posts: 23,323
Location: Spokane Valley, Washington

29 Dec 2013, 5:13 am

TheValk-

Well, since my friend came out, he has become involved with another man he had gotten to know a while back. While this is a long distance relationship - my friend living in Spokane, and his significant other living in Seattle - he seems more than happy.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


TallyMan
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Age:54
Posts: 41,833

29 Dec 2013, 5:56 am

Robdemanc wrote:
I would say all people are born with an asexual nature.


That is not correct. I've seen scientific research that indicated one's sexual orientation is largely determined during a critical phase of foetal development, specifically the foetal brain develops its sexual orientation based on various hormones present. I've forgotten the details now. However, what can happen in a minority of cases is that the sexual orientation of the baby (which is in the brain) may not be the same as the physical (genital) orientation. While there may be other factors that contribute I gather this is one of the main causes of gay sexual orientation.

Regarding gay adoption I have no issues with it. I'm adopted myself. Back in my youth gay adoption would have been politically unthinkable; however society is gradually becoming more accepting and I see no reason why gay couples should be discriminated against on the basis of their sexuality.


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


Who_Am_I
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age:31
Posts: 13,088
Location: My body is in Brisbane and my mind is in the gutter. :D

29 Dec 2013, 8:19 am

babybird wrote:
thomas81 wrote:
babybird wrote:
I don't think anyone should have the rights to adopt a child, no matter who they are or what shenanigans they get up to.


but don't orphaned or neglected children deserve the right to a normal home and loving family?


I was adopted and ended up back in care because it went wrong. I am bias. I suppose it can be good for some people and I wish them all the best, but it does scare me to think that a child can be adopted into an unsuitable family.


A child can be born into an unsuitable family too.


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I