Page 2 of 3 [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

trollcatman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 2012
Age:34
Posts: 2,920

03 Jan 2015, 9:59 pm

Is there any evidence that criminals become less criminal when they are forced to switch to different clothes?
Anyway, it's not that hard to just carry a sock or snow mask around in your pocket that you put on moments before robbing the bank.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Posts: 21,221
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

03 Jan 2015, 10:04 pm

Dillogic wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Also what if someone forgets their beanie and it starts snowing for instance.


Kinda sucky when we live in a time when you say, "you don't need a hoodie, wear a beanie" is thought of as a serious post.



Can you really blame me when the government of some state is about ready to pass such a ridiculous law for taking it seriously when there was no real implication you weren't being serious?


_________________
Winter is coming.


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Posts: 12,900

03 Jan 2015, 10:11 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
Wow what a load of crap, what state do you live in? And I thought it was ridiculous there a couple states trying to sue my state over the marijuana legalization...but this is just a new level. Hopefully it gets over-turned due to the need to keep warm in the cold and well what's next are they going to ban sunglasses, wallet chains, clothes that create a 'dark' image ect? It really is taking it too far.

Also don't see how it would deter any crimes....if someone is wearing a ski mask or otherwise covering their face I imagine their goal is not to get caught in the act so like they really care about a 500 dollar fine if their plan is to get away that's a pretty lame excuse for such a ridiculous law.



Oklahoma and this state is trying to sue yours over legalizing weed. For a state like OK that belly aches constantly about government overreach, a lot of it happens here.


_________________
We hang around singing out everything on the radio.


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Posts: 9,956
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

03 Jan 2015, 10:20 pm

Banning hoodies is retarded. I've been wearing them all my life and it has never occurred to me that there would be a hoodie ban. Bans in general are asinine.
:roll:


_________________
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
- Winston Churchill


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Posts: 12,900

04 Jan 2015, 12:20 am

Never in my wildest dreams did I think they would ban an article of clothing and make it law when you consider how many people wreck their cars while distracted by their cell phones yet they are going to pass a law making it illegal to cover up when cold. That is essentially what this law is saying. It's not about wearing unnecessary clothing just to hide your appearance when the weather is hot. It's about wearing the clothing, period, when outside. It assumes we all do that for nefarious reasons when the vast majority of us do so only because it is freezing cold out there.

What I want to know is, if you are simply outside in the cold with clothing that has a hood, or if you have a scarf or hat, can the cops stop, get out of their car and hand you a $500 ticket. That's beyond all sanity to me.


_________________
We hang around singing out everything on the radio.


trollcatman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 2012
Age:34
Posts: 2,920

04 Jan 2015, 2:36 am

They should put the way you dress under freedom of expression or something, doesn't make sense for the gov to tell people what to wear.



Humanaut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Age:44
Posts: 3,788
Location: Norway

04 Jan 2015, 5:46 am

2015 trend prediction: Earmuffs and Guy Fawkes face paint.



Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 5,904
Location: New Orleans

04 Jan 2015, 8:10 am

Sweetleaf wrote:
Dillogic wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Also what if someone forgets their beanie and it starts snowing for instance.


Kinda sucky when we live in a time when you say, "you don't need a hoodie, wear a beanie" is thought of as a serious post.



Can you really blame me when the government of some state is about ready to pass such a ridiculous law for taking it seriously when there was no real implication you weren't being serious?


It is Oklahoma, I think they will have problems. For one, as a motorcyclist, I am required by law to wear a head covering. I also think there is a langauge problem, beanie, being a watch cap, or ski hat.

The guy who came up with the law said while commiting a crime, but then said anyone in any public place.

The places cited, stores and banks, are private places sometimes open to the public.

Laws must apply to all, so every football game must be hood free.

All places of business are free to put up a sign, "No masked or hooded armed robbers allowed."

This law is so broad it criminalizes wearing a hat while cutting your grass. Doing so while wearing sunglasses could get you shot by the police. Drinking a beer on your porch has gotten people arrested for drinking in a public place. If it can be seen, it is in public. You also have to wear clothes, it is the law.

Any winter street scene from New York or Chicago shows people so wrapped up only their eyes show.

This is a proposed law that Russia Today did an article on, Silly American Behavior.

After all the attention, I do not think this will be voted into law, it would lead to being sued. Wasting the publics money on dumb things will not get you reelected. Telling every mother in the state that their children cannot wear a hood to school is the end of your public service.

I am sure his intent was keeping South Park out of Oklahoma.

Now naked people have a hard time concealing a weapon, but seeing most people naked would cause everyone to leave the state.



Humanaut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Age:44
Posts: 3,788
Location: Norway

04 Jan 2015, 8:45 am

Criminals and terrorists don't like the law now that FBI's new NGI system (in which facial recognition is a promising aspect) is fully operational. Foreign and domestic enemies of the state (and their useful idiots) will of course make some initial noise, as expected, but law abiding citizens have nothing to fear.



Fogman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Age:48
Posts: 3,816
Location: Carolina de Sur

04 Jan 2015, 9:49 am

1401b wrote:
Banning hoodies is just like banning guns, it helps prevent crime and makes the world a safer place.

Not long and we'll all be neekid and broke but ooooh sooo safe!



Benjamin Franklin wrote:
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.


_________________
When There's No There to get to, I'm so There!


Humanaut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Age:44
Posts: 3,788
Location: Norway

04 Jan 2015, 11:39 am

Fogman wrote:
Benjamin Franklin wrote:
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.

I used to think like that too, but public spaces are not analogous to private property in terms of civil rights and liberties. A lot of people seem to overlook this fact.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Posts: 21,221
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

04 Jan 2015, 12:04 pm

Humanaut wrote:
Criminals and terrorists don't like the law now that FBI's new NGI system (in which facial recognition is a promising aspect) is fully operational. Foreign and domestic enemies of the state (and their useful idiots) will of course make some initial noise, as expected, but law abiding citizens have nothing to fear.


Well actually if that law were passed they'd have frostbite and hypothermia to fear...it would seem, considering the region the state is in, they have cold winter there. I kinda doubt most if even any people here are 'domestic enemies of the state' or their useful idiots but whatever, see what you want to see.

The idiots trying to pass this law are the enemies of that state.


_________________
Winter is coming.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Posts: 21,221
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

04 Jan 2015, 12:08 pm

Humanaut wrote:
Fogman wrote:
Benjamin Franklin wrote:
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.

I used to think like that too, but public spaces are not analogous to private property in terms of civil rights and liberties. A lot of people seem to overlook this fact.


Right and how does wearing a hoodie violate anyone's right or cause a danger to public safety? Of course there are going to be more regulations in public than on your private property but that should be limited to laws to prevent things that are harmful to the public. If anything this law would simply harm the public especially if its cold outside.


_________________
Winter is coming.


Humanaut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Age:44
Posts: 3,788
Location: Norway

04 Jan 2015, 12:14 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
...how does wearing a hoodie violate anyone's right or cause a danger to public safety?

It doesn't in itself, as far as I can understand.



ZenDen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2013
Age:72
Posts: 752
Location: On top of the world

04 Jan 2015, 1:07 pm

Once again the Oakies take the lead from Booby Jindal.

Next they'll ban "The Interview" because it's so scary. Cowards.