Why all the threads about SJWS?

Post Reply New Topic

Because this is how they think:

-I have a guy friend
-He seems like a nice guy
-He asked me to go see a movie with him
-OH NO!! ! ! THAT MEANS HE WANTS TO HAVE SEX WITH ME!! !
-BUT I DON'T WANT TO HAVE SEX!! !
-HOW DARE THAT HE WANTS SEX WHEN I DON'T!!
-HE MUST BE A MISOGYNIST WHO FEELS ENTITLED TO A WOMAN'S BODY!! !
-I KNOW THIS BECAUSE ALL NICE GUYS JUST WANT TO GET LAID AND DON'T WANT TO DO OTHER FUN STUFF LIKE GOING TO MOVIES!
-I KNOW BECAUSE TUMBLR SAYD SO AND I BELIEVE EVERYTHING I READ ON IT!! !

-YOU'RE FRIENDZONED!! !
-YOU'RE A MISOGYNIST FOR GETTING PUT INTO THE FRIENDZONE!! !
-GETTING PUT INTO THE FRIENDZONE IS ALL ABOUT ENTITLEMENT!! !
-WOMEN ARE THE REAL VICTIMS OF THE FRIENDZONE BECAUSE THE FRIENDZONE IS NOT REAL!! !

What a winning personality! I don't understand why your lady "friends" wouldn't want to spend time with you........

No critic wants to clearly define SJW. Thus, it seems like they just use the term for anyone who criticises their anti-social behavior.

It's deflection, like saying calm down when you mean shut up.

No an SJW is a woman who f***s up every platonic relationship she has by accusing every male friend of being a rapist or stalker.

You don't sound creepy at all in this thread.

And you don't sound like an SJW at all.

So I had the correct definition in the first place. Thanks!

You forgot to include the conditions that an SJW has to be a radical feminist and leftwing nutjob.

No critic wants to clearly define SJW. Thus, it seems like they just use the term for anyone who criticises their anti-social behavior.

It's deflection, like saying calm down when you mean shut up.

It's an ironic cycle, so-called 'SJWs' stick up for people bullied for 'daring to be different' through what you insist is bullying. Most of the time SJWs are obnoxious but not bullies - and if their obnoxiousness is an issue it should equally be an issue when the social injustice warriors behave obnoxiously.

First we'll have to clearly define the term. I've met lots of people who had total devotion to their social justice cause. It didn't pay well, and they worked almost all the time. You can count on people to volunteer for marching and shouting, and if they feel sufficiently motivated to change their situation, civil disobedience. But you have to train people to do civil disobedience in the classical sense. You have to work out the transportation to the site, and call people to confirm that they will drive and pick up other people. Someone needs to bring water, so people don't pass out on the march because they came unprepared, and on, and on and on to where it takes up most of their lives keeping the volunteers moving in the right direction.

Also, these marches don't just happen by themselves if they aim to accomplish anything. You have to write letters to representatives, have lucid people show up and testify at hearings, and build relationships with people on all sides of the issue so that you can negotiate the solution to the problem, or get the legislation passed, or whatever the social justice goal is.

If you don't think people ought to organize and do those things, then go hide in your hole and hate SJWs. Otherwise, it takes someone a little unhinged to dedicate years of their lives to changing society, and put up with all the inevitable setbacks. Who else would do it?

Some jackass shaking their finger at people on the internet? Many of the people who complain about SJWs do plenty of that.

Not all social justice activists are social justice warriors. One has to engage in the behaviors I mentioned above. One idiot shaking their fist or screaming on is not what I am talking about. I am talking about deliberate campaigns to get what they want by attempting to silence and defame those they disagree with. Gamergate from which the term "social justice warrior" emerged is still a good example.