If I were to run for President, would you vote for me?

Page 6 of 8 [ 106 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Age:27
Posts: 14,274
Location: Omnipresent

02 Sep 2008, 11:41 am

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
greenblue wrote:
in a theocracy


I'm not Jesus Christ, so this wouldn't be a Theocracy. Nor would I care to have it ran like Iran was.
Oh, come on!! They have an amazing system! Few other countries have quieter women!
Quote:
I'd probably want, for economics, some form of socialism for a trial period of time.
As for method of government, revert back to an Athenian democracy with me as "tyrant" for managerial purposes.

Yeah, trial periods in governmental policies are rather hard to implement, especially for something on such a large scale.

Tyrant? Boy, that inspires confidence.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age:29
Posts: 25,257
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

02 Sep 2008, 12:23 pm

A tyrant, as I had learned, was someone who had absolute authority but for the purpose of order.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Age:27
Posts: 14,274
Location: Omnipresent

02 Sep 2008, 12:25 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
A tyrant, as I had learned, was someone who had absolute authority but for the purpose of order.

I say sarcastically once again: boy, that inspires confidence!



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age:29
Posts: 25,257
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

02 Sep 2008, 12:27 pm

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
A tyrant, as I had learned, was someone who had absolute authority but for the purpose of order.

I say sarcastically once again: boy, that inspires confidence!


I knew that was sarcasm.

Tyrants in this case would be able to be booted if necessary.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Age:27
Posts: 14,274
Location: Omnipresent

02 Sep 2008, 12:41 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
I knew that was sarcasm.

Tyrants in this case would be able to be booted if necessary.

If that latter were true, then they'd never exist.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age:29
Posts: 25,257
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

02 Sep 2008, 12:45 pm

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
I knew that was sarcasm.

Tyrants in this case would be able to be booted if necessary.

If that latter were true, then they'd never exist.


Depends if anarchy is preferable or not in the long run.



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age:39
Posts: 9,915
Location: Home

02 Sep 2008, 12:50 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Tyrants in this case would be able to be booted if necessary.

How, would that work, as if there are tyrants, democracy wouldn't exist?


Quote:
If that latter were true, then they'd never exist

Well, unless a revolution takes place, then perhaps, that would be the case.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age:29
Posts: 25,257
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

02 Sep 2008, 1:10 pm

greenblue wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Tyrants in this case would be able to be booted if necessary.

How, would that work, as if there are tyrants, democracy wouldn't exist?


Quote:
If that latter were true, then they'd never exist

Well, unless a revolution takes place, then perhaps, that would be the case.


"Tyrant is only a word, the reality is far worse. Here, let me show you!"



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age:39
Posts: 9,915
Location: Home

02 Sep 2008, 1:27 pm

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Oh, come on!! They have an amazing system! Few other countries have quieter women!

Not so bad then :P


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Bart21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Age:31
Posts: 663

02 Sep 2008, 1:27 pm

greenblue wrote:
Would that mean that immigration would not be an issue anymore, or better said, illegal immigration no longer being illegal?
Well, I think part of this is interesting, the idea of nation being changed, or even abolished, for that there would be a world government, perhaps the west world only, at first. And the idea of nationalism wouldn't make sense anymore, each country becoming a state within the government.


Isn't that already happening ? An elite on top of the masses who have no more sence of identity. In Europe this is gruadually being established with the European union. The goverments are giving away theyr power to an elite running the European union. We wil soon have even less of a chance to decide our own destiny. New satelites and cameras are being build to watch our every step. On the internet they are proposing the making of a passport so they can track whatever you say online. So if someone says something online that isn't pc they can be jailed by the thoughts police.
Seems like some sort of totalitarian socialist system is slowly but steadily putting chains on us.

More on topic, as long as there are people of a certain cultural heritage and ethnicity nationalism wil always make sence. No thought police/media campaign wil ever make me betray my heritage and identity.
Immigration laws are the only thing that could possibly stop the 1st world from being turned into the 3rd world through mass immigration.
These days it seems to be inevetable though, risising immigration guarantys a drastic increase in violent crimes. Europe wil soon proberbly get the same crime rates as America if the current situation continues.



Haliphron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Age:33
Posts: 2,293

02 Sep 2008, 1:30 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
I would, but I'm shamelessly biased. :P

Anyone else who'd vote for me?

Who'd like to be VP?


HELL No.


Sorry, Im just being totally honest with you here.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Age:27
Posts: 14,274
Location: Omnipresent

02 Sep 2008, 9:24 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Depends if anarchy is preferable or not in the long run.

Preferences are subjective and I am the subject.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age:29
Posts: 25,257
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

03 Sep 2008, 8:42 am

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Depends if anarchy is preferable or not in the long run.

Preferences are subjective and I am the subject.

Hope you can defend yourself then.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Age:27
Posts: 14,274
Location: Omnipresent

03 Sep 2008, 8:58 am

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Hope you can defend yourself then.

What good anarchist doesn't have enough firepower to do that thrice over?



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age:29
Posts: 25,257
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

03 Sep 2008, 10:32 am

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Hope you can defend yourself then.

What good anarchist doesn't have enough firepower to do that thrice over?

So, for the undefended: would you make them your slaves?