iamnotaparakeet wrote:
I don't think "can't" is correct. May not, would be. A scientist can equally become a slave
as much as a Burger King manager could be. Occupation does not relate to intelligence.
Not by necessity at least, though I'm certain a study could be fabricated to prove otherwise.
Umm.... "can't" is somewhat correct, because of the fact that slaves will tend to dislike being slaves, and higher level jobs will require them to have levels of freedom that slaves will tend to use to rebel as non-slavery will be considered more favorable than slavery. So, the entire issue isn't intelligence or anything like that, but rather economic efficacy, slavery for a system will be economically inefficient to an extent that will prevent solid, diverse growth. I mean, I am not denying that it could be efficient for plantations(I might have to investigate the legal costs of a slave system), but I doubt it would be efficient for a non-plantation based system in a more modern economy.
Also, occupation does relate to intelligence, I think that there has been research done on multiple occasions showing that certain occupations tend to be smarter, and I would not be surprised if certain occupations demand a certain level of intelligence to be a reasonable opportunity. Finally, IQ and income correlate, and income strongly relates to occupation... so... yes.