test
Atlas has another reason to shrug...
Icyclan wrote:
I didn't particularly enjoy reading Atlas Shrugged. It's really drawn out and I kept thinking that she could've conveyed her message in a book that's half as long. I do agree with some of the tenets, but the deification of money was a bit much for me.
Being able to produce and setting your job satisfaction as the ultimate goal in life is all fine and well, but you can't really expect an intellectually limited factory worker stuck in a dead end job to muster up that kind of enthusiasm for what he's condemned to do until his retirement. Rand's side of the argument is only viewed through the eyes of the extremely capable (Dagny, Hank, Galt, etc.) or in one case, the slightly less capable (Eddie Wilders).
That said, I'm not my brother's keeper; I want to actually keep what I earn, and not pay a 35% income tax. I also don't want to fill out a hundred forms every time I get a new client. I'm willing to chip in, but I want less taxes, less bureaucracy and most of all, less government.
Being able to produce and setting your job satisfaction as the ultimate goal in life is all fine and well, but you can't really expect an intellectually limited factory worker stuck in a dead end job to muster up that kind of enthusiasm for what he's condemned to do until his retirement. Rand's side of the argument is only viewed through the eyes of the extremely capable (Dagny, Hank, Galt, etc.) or in one case, the slightly less capable (Eddie Wilders).
That said, I'm not my brother's keeper; I want to actually keep what I earn, and not pay a 35% income tax. I also don't want to fill out a hundred forms every time I get a new client. I'm willing to chip in, but I want less taxes, less bureaucracy and most of all, less government.
Who says a factory worker has to be intellectually limited? My Dad had been an industrial worker his whole life, and he was one of the best read, most intelligent men I've ever known. Supporting a family had kept him in a dead end job his whole life, due to the high pay and decent benefits. That, and undiagnosed Asperger's and depression doubtlessly did its part in keeping where he was in life.
And by the way, those with the money are taxed more precisely because they can be taxed without suffering the burden that such taxation would cause the rest of us.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer wrote:
Unbridled altruism and sacrifice being bad? I thought such notions were taught in the Judaism you were raised with.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
In Perke Avot I:15
R. Hillel says:
If I am not for myself, then who is for me?
If I am only for myself, then what am I?
If not now, then when?
In Sfira 62, Baba Metzia R. ben Petura brings up the issue of two men in the desert with only enough water for one to survive to get back to civilization. If both drink then both die. R. ben Petura says: Both should drink so that one should not see his brother die before his eyes. R. Akiba responds: Nay. One should drink and live and the other die. He asserted that one's own life takes precedence. The halacha was with R. Akiba and not with R. ben Petura.
ruveyn
ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Unbridled altruism and sacrifice being bad? I thought such notions were taught in the Judaism you were raised with.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
In Perke Avot I:15
R. Hillel says:
If I am not for myself, then who is for me?
If I am only for myself, then what am I?
If not now, then when?
In Sfira 62, Baba Metzia R. ben Petura brings up the issue of two men in the desert with only enough water for one to survive to get back to civilization. If both drink then both die. R. ben Petura says: Both should drink so that one should not see his brother die before his eyes. R. Akiba responds: Nay. One should drink and live and the other die. He asserted that one's own life takes precedence. The halacha was with R. Akiba and not with R. ben Petura.
ruveyn
Easy to say if you're the one getting the water.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Easy to say if you're the one getting the water.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Nothing amusing here. This is the basic question underlying triage or any rationing of vital resources. A hard question.
ruveuyn
Personally, I'd rather not have to make that choice for myself. If it came down to my wife or daughter, you'd better bet I'd choose in favor of my loved ones.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Unbridled altruism and sacrifice being bad? I thought such notions were taught in the Judaism you were raised with.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
In Perke Avot I:15
R. Hillel says:
If I am not for myself, then who is for me?
If I am only for myself, then what am I?
If not now, then when?
In Sfira 62, Baba Metzia R. ben Petura brings up the issue of two men in the desert with only enough water for one to survive to get back to civilization. If both drink then both die. R. ben Petura says: Both should drink so that one should not see his brother die before his eyes. R. Akiba responds: Nay. One should drink and live and the other die. He asserted that one's own life takes precedence. The halacha was with R. Akiba and not with R. ben Petura.
ruveyn
Hi ruveyn,
I take it that "Life Boat Ethics" comes close, as with the pithy address label:
http://www.vbm-torah.org/halakha/lifeboatethics.htm
I will always wonder why example questions used in ethics will often use "known & certain facts" when such "facts" are seldom the rule in reality. That might be my Bayesian observations being an influence again.
But, how often is "certain" knowledge of useful "facts" available in adverse situations? This is a problem, as such a line of weighted reasoning can usually sink Singer, and the "Monty Hall Paradox" can have deadly consequences if succumbed to in real emergencies. I can easily picture the companion dying of thirst with the other person still having his bottle half-full of water, and then, just as death strikes, over the very next sand dune, an unexpected caravan with plenty of spare water.
Uncertainty can certainly turn a "Brave Captain" in the unfornutate lifeboat into a murderous fool with each freakish opportunity, and being in a lifeboat, "something" has already gone bizarrely wrong.
Old Age is top priority in Brave Captain's jetsam protocol with impending threat of doom, and impairment is probably a close second, but the use of the phrase "Brave Captain" for making life & death decisions for others was left in the lurch in the movie version of "Abandon Ship!" with a Randian tempting Tyrone Power.
Tadzio
jojobean wrote:
From what I have seen, she seems to glorify sociopathic personality disorder.
Rand is one of the last Romanticists, which explains her rather weird plotlines and philosophies. Romanticism largely began in 1812 as the bourgeoisie started attaining power and largely turned their backs on the enlightenment philosophies (Smith, Descartes, Franklin, etc.) The first major conflict with the Romanticist cultural icons was in 1848 when Communism began and Anarcho-Syndicalism became prominent. Between 1848 and the 1940s, there was an actual war carried out between the groups, although never official. The Long Depression (1873-1898) saw the most brutal fights. Romanticism came to an end at the end of World War II for the most part. But Ayn Rand remained as one of the last holdouts.
ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Personally, I'd rather not have to make that choice for myself. If it came down to my wife or daughter, you'd better bet I'd choose in favor of my loved ones.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
That is how I would bet. Blood is thicker than water.
ruveyn
Hi ruveyn,
Then it is otherwise OK, if I'm not directly related to the Angels?
Then since it's OK otherwise, if I open my doors to the Angels, is the advice not to look back still valid?
Tadzio
ruveyn wrote:
Even so, she hit upon one of the reason's that the society is falling apart. Unbridled altruism and sacrifice. A principle that says each of us must live for the All. Tell me, sport, did God give us an Ego that we should renounce it? Even the Almighty told Moses that his name was I Am What I am. Lots of "I" there, yes? Self control, Si, self sacrifice No.
You're extremely delusional if you believe this.
Dennis wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Even so, she hit upon one of the reason's that the society is falling apart. Unbridled altruism and sacrifice. A principle that says each of us must live for the All. Tell me, sport, did God give us an Ego that we should renounce it? Even the Almighty told Moses that his name was I Am What I am. Lots of "I" there, yes? Self control, Si, self sacrifice No.
You're extremely delusional if you believe this.
It's just a smoke and mirrors game for elitists
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| I wish I could just shrug this off... |
23 Jan 2010, 4:04 pm |
| Why is Mr. Shrug brown? |
27 Feb 2008, 3:41 pm |
| Meet Atlas! |
14 Jul 2013, 12:37 am |
| Atlas Shrugged |
06 Jun 2007, 6:34 am |
