test
Page 1 of 2 [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age:45
Posts: 5,396
Location: International House of Paincakes...

27 Jan 2012, 6:38 am

(CLICK!)

Quote:
The Philippines said on Friday it would accept a greater US military presence on its territory to help defend its interests and ensure peace in the region, amid rising tensions with China.

Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario said the Philippines wanted more joint exercises with its former colonial ruler and to have a greater number of US troops rotating through the Southeast Asian country.

"It is to our definite advantage to be exploring how to maximise our treaty alliance with the United States in ways that would be mutually acceptable and beneficial," del Rosario said in a statement.

...

The Philippines has been locked in a decades-long dispute with China over competing claims to the South China Sea, but the tensions have escalated during the past year over what Manila considers increasing Chinese bullying.

Del Rosario said the increased US military presence could include "planning more joint exercises to promote interoperability and a rotating and more frequent presence by them".

"Such cooperative efforts would as well result in achieving a balance of influence to ensure peace, stability, and economic development in the region," he said.


:roll:


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


sacrip
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 2008
Age:41
Posts: 889

27 Jan 2012, 9:00 am

OK, I give up, what's the problem with this? We operate all over the world. If this makes our ties with the Phillipines better AND keeps China on their toes, all the better.


_________________
Everything would be better if you were in charge.


GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age:45
Posts: 5,396
Location: International House of Paincakes...

27 Jan 2012, 10:44 am

I guess I just like the irony here...


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


MrXxx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2010
Age:54
Posts: 5,680
Location: New England

27 Jan 2012, 11:59 am

Yeah, I'm not quite getting your point either. Can you explain the irony?

(Not looking for an argument, I really don't understand what you're trying to say.)


_________________
MrXxx has dropped off the face of the earth as you know it. Though he does occasionally come creeping out of it's nostrils to fling boogers around.


GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age:45
Posts: 5,396
Location: International House of Paincakes...

27 Jan 2012, 1:32 pm

Well...

1) The US had a huge military presence there, but the Filipinos kicked us out in 1992...

B. No sooner do we "bring home" troops from Iraq and Afghanistan than we start SENDING troops to Australia and the Philippines...

3rd. The Chinese will soon be able to bring CONSIDERABLE force to bear on its claim to the South China Sea thanks to its new AIRCRAFT CARRIER... An aircraft carrier paid for largely with American trade.

If China becomes a menace to the region, it will be because American Greed allowed it.



In short, we made China what it is, and now we are stationing troops to keep them in check.

I think that's pretty damn ironic.


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


Last edited by GoonSquad on 27 Jan 2012, 9:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

sacrip
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 2008
Age:41
Posts: 889

27 Jan 2012, 3:02 pm

Think of it this way: If we're China's best customers, then we're also someone China can't afford to tick off, lest it lose its gravy train. So, we just place people anywhere we don't want China to mess with, the peace is kept and everybody's happy. Or, we can pull Most Favored Nation status, embargo everything from them, make prices of everything here go up, and make them revert to Militarism and bullying everyone for food and resources instead of just buying them. I like option A better.


_________________
Everything would be better if you were in charge.


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age:115
Posts: 25,932
Location: Stendec

27 Jan 2012, 3:21 pm

I knew the RP couldn't last forever without us.

Magsaysay Boulevard, here we come!

:twisted:



Calder_Grayling
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Age:36
Posts: 10

27 Jan 2012, 9:11 pm

sacrip wrote:
If we're China's best customers, then we're also someone China can't afford to tick off, lest it lose its gravy train.


I was under the impression that China owns around $3 trillion of US debt. If this is the case, America can ill afford to tick off China.



GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age:45
Posts: 5,396
Location: International House of Paincakes...

27 Jan 2012, 10:09 pm

sacrip wrote:
Think of it this way: If we're China's best customers, then we're also someone China can't afford to tick off, lest it lose its gravy train. So, we just place people anywhere we don't want China to mess with, the peace is kept and everybody's happy. Or, we can pull Most Favored Nation status, embargo everything from them, make prices of everything here go up, and make them revert to Militarism and bullying everyone for food and resources instead of just buying them. I like option A better.


Calder_Grayling wrote:
I was under the impression that China owns around $3 trillion of US debt. If this is the case, America can ill afford to tick off China.


It's really a tale of two deficits. On one hand the US has a $500 billion+ trade deficit with the world--about $300 billion with China alone. On the other hand China owns trillions in US debt, frankly, because they don't know where else to put their huge piles of excess cash.

In essence, China is loaning us money to buy their stuff even as they help to undermine and destroy our industrial base. This is a really bad situation for the US, and it cannot last.


The sad truth is, sacrip's "option A" is not sustainable.

China has an economy based on creating wealth by combining capital, labor, and raw materials to produce something more valuable than the sum of its parts. The US has an economy based on Investment Fraud and credit abuse. Partisan politics aside, Obama was right when he said we need to bring industry back to America.

We certainly don't need to try to confront/isolate China. First, it is not possible, and second, if it was possible it would only trun them into a giant version of North Korea...

We need to find a middle way. We need to demand better from China in the realm of Human Rights and working conditions/wages for workers that produce goods for export to the US.

We need to scale back trade with China and redevelop some domestic manufacturing. Sure, it will mean higher prices, but that is not really a bad thing (google "Fordism").


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


Longshanks
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Feb 2012
Age:50
Posts: 558
Location: At an undisclosed airbase at Shangri-la

10 Feb 2012, 2:00 am

What is going on is that the Campaigner-in-Chief is burying his head in the sand even though we'll be at war with Iran within a couple of years anyway.


_________________
Supporter of the Brian Terry Foundation @ www.honorbrianterry.com . Special Agent Brian Terry (1970-2010) was murdered as a direct result of Operation Fast & Furious - which Barry O won't discuss - wonder why?


MsMarginalized
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2011
Age:48
Posts: 1,854
Location: Lost in the Delta Quadrant

11 Feb 2012, 11:02 pm

GoonSquad wrote:
Well...

1) The US had a huge military presence there, but the Filipinos kicked us out in 1992...



Sorry to be the one to tell you, but that is a WRONG statement.

President JIMMY CARTER signed an altered "SOFA" while in office in the '70's. It gave away the Panama Canal AND all the military bases in the PI. The US forces were "allowed" to stay (as tenants--read RENTERS) and the American TAXPAYERS got to pony up the gravy for all kinds of fiascos over in the PI (I know this for a fact because I was stationed over there in the 1980's).

In 1992, Mt. Pinotubo (a supposed dormant volcano) erupted....THAT is why the U.S. military left. (The "lease" was actually set to expire w/in a year or 2 of THAT, anyway). So, unless you consider a volcano as a "Filipino", NO ONE kicked the U.S. out.



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age:27
Posts: 12,327
Location: Montréal

11 Feb 2012, 11:49 pm

Look, I know everyone is super scared of China's shiny [old... Soviet] aircraft carrier and the others planned for the future. But it won't change the balance of power that greatly in that region. Why? Because basically everything in the disputed area is in range of ground-based aircraft. The aircraft carriers are meant to tip the balance elsewhere.

In any case I'm not all that surprised. I think there will be a clash between the US and the PRC eventually


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Posts: 9,956
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

12 Feb 2012, 1:45 am

Vigilans wrote:
Look, I know everyone is super scared of China's shiny [old... Soviet] aircraft carrier and the others planned for the future. But it won't change the balance of power that greatly in that region. Why? Because basically everything in the disputed area is in range of ground-based aircraft. The aircraft carriers are meant to tip the balance elsewhere.

In any case I'm not all that surprised. I think there will be a clash between the US and the PRC eventually


I hope we can count on Canada's support if it comes to that.



GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age:45
Posts: 5,396
Location: International House of Paincakes...

12 Feb 2012, 7:08 am

Raptor wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Look, I know everyone is super scared of China's shiny [old... Soviet] aircraft carrier and the others planned for the future. But it won't change the balance of power that greatly in that region. Why? Because basically everything in the disputed area is in range of ground-based aircraft. The aircraft carriers are meant to tip the balance elsewhere.

In any case I'm not all that surprised. I think there will be a clash between the US and the PRC eventually


I hope we can count on Canada's support if it comes to that.



...'cuz that will help... :roll: :lol:

If there's more than a cold war style proxy war the US is doomed.

Direct conflict is not an option.

PS

Going back to a bipolar/cold war world model might not be so bad...


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


Last edited by GoonSquad on 12 Feb 2012, 7:22 am, edited 1 time in total.

GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age:45
Posts: 5,396
Location: International House of Paincakes...

12 Feb 2012, 7:15 am

MsMarginalized wrote:
GoonSquad wrote:
Well...

1) The US had a huge military presence there, but the Filipinos kicked us out in 1992...



Sorry to be the one to tell you, but that is a WRONG statement.

President JIMMY CARTER signed an altered "SOFA" while in office in the '70's. It gave away the Panama Canal AND all the military bases in the PI. The US forces were "allowed" to stay (as tenants--read RENTERS) and the American TAXPAYERS got to pony up the gravy for all kinds of fiascos over in the PI (I know this for a fact because I was stationed over there in the 1980's).

In 1992, Mt. Pinotubo (a supposed dormant volcano) erupted....THAT is why the U.S. military left. (The "lease" was actually set to expire w/in a year or 2 of THAT, anyway). So, unless you consider a volcano as a "Filipino", NO ONE kicked the U.S. out.

That's really a distinction without a difference. The Filipinos were not going to renew the lease because they wanted us gone.


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus