test
Board index › General Discussion › News and Current Events

Chen: China democracy 'slow but irreversible'

Page 1 of 2 [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age:26
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

31 May 2012, 9:21 pm

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18283637 My opinon is you may never see a democracy in China any time soon.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age:78
Posts: 31,726
Location: New Jersey

01 Jun 2012, 6:03 pm

Joker wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18283637 My opinon is you may never see a democracy in China any time soon.


Chinese democracy is like Chinese food. Two hours later and you don't know you even had it.

ruveyn



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age:26
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

02 Jun 2012, 1:32 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Joker wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18283637 My opinon is you may never see a democracy in China any time soon.


Chinese democracy is like Chinese food. Two hours later and you don't know you even had it.

ruveyn


Exactly.



Jkid
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Age:27
Posts: 551
Location: College Park,MD

02 Jun 2012, 3:03 pm

Even if China slowly changes from a Authoritarian "communist" country to a democratic society, the political culture will still remain. When the Chinese Communist Party to control of China, they're merely changed one system of emperorship to another. While there has been great social change in china after Mao's acention, there was no real political change. If China transitions to democracy, the real transition: The transition of one culture to another will take a lot longer to uproot.



Aelfwine
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 3 May 2012
Posts: 184

03 Jun 2012, 3:11 am

A dictatorship cannot survive indefinitely.
I think that the economic growth in China can't continue indefinitely.
With a higher life standart the Chinese people could try to get better education, and to get more interested in politics.
If the economic growth ends, the people would become unhappy and try to fight for there rights.
In my view it is only a question of time.

But the result of a revolution must not be democracy.



Longshanks
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Feb 2012
Age:50
Posts: 558
Location: At an undisclosed airbase at Shangri-la

09 Jun 2012, 2:32 pm

Aelfwine wrote:
A dictatorship cannot survive indefinitely.
I think that the economic growth in China can't continue indefinitely.
With a higher life standart the Chinese people could try to get better education, and to get more interested in politics.
If the economic growth ends, the people would become unhappy and try to fight for there rights.
In my view it is only a question of time.

But the result of a revolution must not be democracy.


A dictatorship may not last forever, but the Roman Empire is proof that it can still last a good, long time.

Longshanks


_________________
Supporter of the Brian Terry Foundation @ www.honorbrianterry.com . Special Agent Brian Terry (1970-2010) was murdered as a direct result of Operation Fast & Furious - which Barry O won't discuss - wonder why?


Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age:26
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

09 Jun 2012, 6:39 pm

Longshanks wrote:
Aelfwine wrote:
A dictatorship cannot survive indefinitely.
I think that the economic growth in China can't continue indefinitely.
With a higher life standart the Chinese people could try to get better education, and to get more interested in politics.
If the economic growth ends, the people would become unhappy and try to fight for there rights.
In my view it is only a question of time.

But the result of a revolution must not be democracy.


A dictatorship may not last forever, but the Roman Empire is proof that it can still last a good, long time.

Longshanks


The Roman Empire was not always a dictatorship.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age:78
Posts: 31,726
Location: New Jersey

09 Jun 2012, 8:53 pm

Joker wrote:

The Roman Empire was not always a dictatorship.


The so-called Republic was a power sharing measure to put off revolution. It was not truly democratic and the fat cats still ran Rome even under the (so-called) Republic. Review the history of Pompeii Magnus and how he got to run Rome until he was undone by Julius Caesar who ended up running Rome even when it was a Republic. He was granted executive powers by the Senate for life which led to has assassination. But to no avail. The thugs Marc Antony and Octavian took over anyway. People who would not play along were murdered.

Rome was an oligarchy long before it became an Impereum.

ruveyn



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age:27
Posts: 29,227
Location: Lancashire, UK

09 Jun 2012, 8:54 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Chinese democracy is like Chinese food.


I bet proper Chinese food isn't like that.



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age:26
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

09 Jun 2012, 9:02 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Joker wrote:

The Roman Empire was not always a dictatorship.


The so-called Republic was a power sharing measure to put off revolution. It was not truly democratic and the fat cats still ran Rome even under the (so-called) Republic. Review the history of Pompeii Magnus and how he got to run Rome until he was undone by Julius Caesar who ended up running Rome even when it was a Republic. He was granted executive powers by the Senate for life which led to has assassination. But to no avail. The thugs Marc Antony and Octavian took over anyway. People who would not play along were murdered.

Rome was an oligarchy long before it became an Impereum.

ruveyn


True but their are parts of the Roman Empire that was in fact some what democratic.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age:78
Posts: 31,726
Location: New Jersey

09 Jun 2012, 9:49 pm

Joker wrote:

True but their are parts of the Roman Empire that was in fact some what democratic.


Only in a trivial way. There were elections. But power was exercised in an irresponsible manner and the laws of Rome were inadequate to right wrongs and restore justice. The big operators literally got away with murder.

ruveyn



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age:26
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

09 Jun 2012, 9:54 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Joker wrote:

True but their are parts of the Roman Empire that was in fact some what democratic.


Only in a trivial way. There were elections. But power was exercised in an irresponsible manner and the laws of Rome were inadequate to right wrongs and restore justice. The big operators literally got away with murder.

ruveyn


They didn't teach that in School. Glad I know that now.



Aelfwine
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 3 May 2012
Posts: 184

10 Jun 2012, 5:42 am

Quote:
Longshanks wrote:

A dictatorship may not last forever, but the Roman Empire is proof that it can still last a good, long time.


The differences to Rome are the modern communication, better education and democratic trading partners.
All this supports democracy.

Quote:
ruveyn wrote:

Only in a trivial way. There were elections. But power was exercised in an irresponsible manner and the laws of Rome were inadequate to right wrongs and restore justice. The big operators literally got away with murder.

I think that Rome was a republic but not a democracy.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age:78
Posts: 31,726
Location: New Jersey

10 Jun 2012, 8:25 am

Aelfwine wrote:
I think that Rome was a republic but not a democracy.


That it was.

And Athen's the "democracy" was governed by only 1/6 of its population. Women, foreigners and slaves were not allowed to vote.

ruveyn



Rainy
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2012
Posts: 174

10 Jun 2012, 8:54 am

Rome has accomplished much more under its dictatorship than it did with its senators.