jimservo wrote:

Me comment was not a serious one. I'm really terrible at economics. I understand the general stuff, but after I forget all the detailed stuff moments after it is after I logic it out. It's just too complicated

.
Well, I was not taking your comment incredibly serious either, I was just still thinking about the gold standard. I think the major modern argument for it though, really does not stem so much from the efficiency of the gold standard so much as the distrust for fiat money stemming from certain ideas and theories on governmental intervention in the money supply, which I won't get into because I am mostly rambling thus far.