Page 1 of 4 [ 63 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

31 May 2017, 11:05 am

Politico: Merkel’s thunderbolt is starting gun for European defense drive. German chancellor sees unreliability of Trump and Britain as stimulus for next stage in EU integration.

Quote:
...she described the NATO and G7 summits she attended last week with U.S. President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Theresa May as “unsatisfactory,” adding that Europeans needed to take more responsibility for their security.

“The era in which we could fully rely on others is over to some extent — that’s what I experienced over the past several days,” she said in Munich on Sunday. “We Europeans must really take our fate into our own hands.”


Quote:
What she is doing is making it clear, following the election of resolutely pro-European President Emmanuel Macron in France, that the answer to increasing transatlantic and cross-Channel uncertainty should be to strengthen the EU, shore up the eurozone and take the next steps in building a European security and defense union.


Quote:
Trump publicly lambasted his allies for their weak defense spending, implying that many owed America or NATO billions in past military spending. The nationalist president seems intent on turning NATO’s d’Artagnan doctrine — “one for all and all for one” — into a mafia tough’s protection racket: “Nice territory you got there; hate to see anything happen to it.”


Image

If NATO is obsolete, which seems to be the case as England and America have disassociated themselves, what does this mean for Europe, and how does this affect world affairs?



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

31 May 2017, 11:35 am

NATO is far from being "done."

There will always be conflict between nations, even between allies.

Trump has to learn to be more diplomatic, though, and to know things like "the 2 percent of the budget requirement for defense for each NATO member does not take effect until 2024."

He just has to learn how to deal with other world leaders much better than he does. Many of them think he's a boor.



androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

31 May 2017, 11:57 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
NATO is far from being "done."

There will always be conflict between nations, even between allies.

Trump has to learn to be more diplomatic, though, and to know things like "the 2 percent of the budget requirement for defense for each NATO member does not take effect until 2024."

He just has to learn how to deal with other world leaders much better than he does. Many of them think he's a boor.


He is not so stupid that he does not know of the 2024 deadline, I think. This is his way of telling Europe to get stuffed. Same with the Paris Accord. Meanwhile, relations are great with the pillar of democracy, Saudi Arabia.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

31 May 2017, 12:05 pm

Trump is just one person. He, alone, cannot get rid of the NATO alliance, even if he wanted to.

There is always "underground diplomacy" going on between, say, Germany and the United States, which effectively blunts the Trump effect. Diplomats have long-standing relationships with other diplomats.

Trump is showing his absurdity more and more. This will be his downfall, ultimately, I believe.

Hopefully, say, four years from now, Trump will be seen as an ephemeral phenomenon, and Trumpism an ephemeral phase.



androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

31 May 2017, 12:42 pm

The Atlantic: The Death Knell for America's Global Leadership: In an op-ed, the Trump administration’s “adults in the room” envision America in the image of its leader: selfish, isolated, brutish, domineering, and driven by immediate appetites rather than ideals or even longer-term interests.

Quote:
H.R. McMaster and Gary Cohn may not be the most influential people in the Trump White House. But the national-security adviser and the director of the National Economic Council are surely the White House’s most presentable faces. When they sign their names to a statement of Trumpism at its most dangerous, we are warned: The so-called adults in the room are shirking their responsibilities.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

31 May 2017, 1:35 pm

I see what you mean. He is diluting US prestige on the world stage. He's making us a laughingstock.

Let's up this is just a temporary phenomenon, and that we get back to sanity soon. After Trump, we should just have a clean slate again as far as international relations are concerned. We only hope that our allies will also have a clean slate.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,791
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

01 Jun 2017, 1:37 am

I hope to God it's not. With Putin's star rising, I seriously believe we need a powerful counter balance in Europe to prevent a potentially new major military conflict there.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

01 Jun 2017, 5:22 am

I don't get it. He simply told everyone else to contribute their fair share, instead of always expecting the US to carry the brunt of it.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

01 Jun 2017, 7:04 am

What is NATO's purpose in the 21st century? It is a relic from a time when we thought the Soviet's were imminently going to be spilling over the border into Western Europe but the Soviet's no longer exist and only a handful of the bloc's members contribute their fair share. It's not just about raising their defense spending, it's the fact that they haven't met this benchmark for years if ever whereas the US has spent more than everybody combined so obviously it's an uneven relationship. If Russia is so scary like someone you people seem to think they how come these countries refuse to raise their defense spending? The fact is, Russia is not a threat the US so if Europe does not have a problem with them then neither should we. I think it's doubtful without US pressure that Europe would maintain economic sanctions since it's cutting off their nose to spite their face for them. If NATO cannot face the biggest threat to our collective security then maybe it is time for new alliances with more reliable partners.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

01 Jun 2017, 8:07 am

I understand Trump wants some other nations to contribute their "fair share."

But he didn't do this right. He wasn't diplomatic about it. He acted like a stern parent. Leaders of sovereign nations aren't misbehaving kids.

Leaders of sovereign nations don't take kindly to people talking down to them in public.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

01 Jun 2017, 8:50 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
I understand Trump wants some other nations to contribute their "fair share."

But he didn't do this right. He wasn't diplomatic about it. He acted like a stern parent. Leaders of sovereign nations aren't misbehaving kids.

Leaders of sovereign nations don't take kindly to people talking down to them in public.


My thought was they are like little kids expecting the US to do take responsibility of most everything for them. To me the problem isn't how he talked to them, but that he had to.



AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

01 Jun 2017, 9:01 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
I understand Trump wants some other nations to contribute their "fair share."

But he didn't do this right. He wasn't diplomatic about it. He acted like a stern parent. Leaders of sovereign nations aren't misbehaving kids.

Leaders of sovereign nations don't take kindly to people talking down to them in public.

Well, U.S. presidents of both major political parties have tried for years to get the socialist nations that are protected by NATO to pony up for their protection. All involved in such diplomacy has failed. The United Nations coasts on American cash and yet does painfully little to "come to the aid of" its cash cow. While President Trump could be gentler about his support of convincing nations to share the burden, a little bit of Harry Truman and Lyndon Johnson resides in him. Both former presidents needed coalition nations to accomplish their goals in World War II, the Korean conflict and the Viet Nam conflict. But, the beneficiaries of U.S. involvement have seldom repaid us since then. If the president gets uppity with some socialist nations who expect to coast on our largesse, more power to him, I say.


_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

01 Jun 2017, 9:04 am

Even then they still don't listen, the NATO partnership doesn't equally benefit the US and these countries obviously do not feel very threatened if they can't make minimum benchmarks. It's not fair to the US for it to have to subsidize the defense for these cradle to grave welfare states, we spend more than everybody else combined. The US isn't at threat by anyone, we do not need NATO but they need us.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

01 Jun 2017, 9:11 am

It does not benefit the US to be isolationist. I believe it is essential that we be part of some sort of alliance. Being part of an alliance is not being part of a "one-world" government.

With the possible exception of the Scandinavian nations, I wouldn't call any member of NATO a "socialist" nation.



GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

01 Jun 2017, 9:22 am

Jacoby wrote:
What is NATO's purpose in the 21st century? It is a relic from a time when we thought the Soviet's were imminently going to be spilling over the border into Western Europe but the Soviet's no longer exist and only a handful of the bloc's members contribute their fair share. It's not just about raising their defense spending, it's the fact that they haven't met this benchmark for years if ever whereas the US has spent more than everybody combined so obviously it's an uneven relationship. If Russia is so scary like someone you people seem to think they how come these countries refuse to raise their defense spending? The fact is, Russia is not a threat the US so if Europe does not have a problem with them then neither should we. I think it's doubtful without US pressure that Europe would maintain economic sanctions since it's cutting off their nose to spite their face for them. If NATO cannot face the biggest threat to our collective security then maybe it is time for new alliances with more reliable partners.

The purpose of NATO is to put a boot on your boss Vladimir's neck and keep him down.
:)


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

01 Jun 2017, 9:31 am

EzraS wrote:
My thought was they are like little kids expecting the US to do take responsibility of most everything for them. To me the problem isn't how he talked to them, but that he had to.


All those nations supported America when it was attacked on 9/11. Perhaps he should think about that too.