test

Woman refuses to drug infant, thrown off Airplane

Page 1 of 2 [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

svend_sved
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Age:24
Posts: 352
Location: denmark

26 Jul 2007, 1:49 pm

if it was me that was treated like that, i would have beaten that airplane personel up, nomatter the consequenses. i would propably get trown off the plane anyways, but at least for a reason i could understand. kids gotta have time to be kids. tolerance and general goodwill with your fellow man or woman is aperantly somthing this world lacks. all people gotta do is be nice to eachother. how hard can it be?



Pandora
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2005
Age:54
Posts: 4,684
Location: Townsville

14 Aug 2007, 4:53 am

Anubis wrote:
Disgusting that an airline employee should treat people like that. It's not as if the kid was being violent or screaming.
I got put off a plane a couple of years ago because of getting very agitated from a child screaming about a foot behind my head. Having a toddler saying "bye bye plane" wouldn't have bothered me one bit though. I could understand a hostie saying something to a parent whose kid wouldn't stop screaming but even then, they usually try to calm the child down by giving them toys or colouring books or a drink (maybe adding a bit of alcohol would put the child to sleep but would hardly be considered socially responsible)


_________________
Break out you Western girls,
Someday soon you're gonna rule the world.
Break out you Western girls,
Hold your heads up high.
"Western Girls" - Dragon


Pandora
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2005
Age:54
Posts: 4,684
Location: Townsville

14 Aug 2007, 4:57 am

Kosmonaut wrote:
Well some kids are quite cool; and the ones that start screaming and tantruming it's usually the parents who annoy me by not really doing much about it.

I was in the opticians the other day, and one kid was running up and down the place shouting and screaming like it was a playground. The mother seemed to be oblivious and made no attempt to control the child.

The place was quite full as well, and i showed a lot of restraint by not walking out; i just stared at the mother thinking control your child woman. I thought i did well in keeping my opinions to myself.

But that's as far as it goes. There's a lot i will never understand about polite society.
I supposed when you have your own, then you get more understanding of these situations.
To a degree, but my kids weren't too bad. Some kids are shockers!


_________________
Break out you Western girls,
Someday soon you're gonna rule the world.
Break out you Western girls,
Hold your heads up high.
"Western Girls" - Dragon


kitsunetsuki
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2007
Age:45
Posts: 289

14 Aug 2007, 12:12 pm

Of course whats to say Baby benadryl would have made the child quieter, my daughter had a reaction to some food and the doctor had us give her some and see certainly didn't get sleepy or or stop talking she talks almost constantly sometimes and this did not interrupt her at all in fact,she seemed more active actually.



greatballzofire
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2007
Posts: 68
Location: A little cabin in the mountains

16 Aug 2007, 10:17 pm

Well, as much as I detest small children, I do feel sorry for the poor mother who had to lug her child and all the baby paraphernalia that goes along with having a rugrat around an airport for hours, and then get booted off her flight because her kid was noisy. For adults that are hyper-sensitive to the high pitch of children's voices, MP3 players with earbuds are a good defence. Wouldn't leave home without mine!
I mean., you can't in good conscience relegate parents with small children to the cargo hold; it's not pressurized!
Update: just Googled last statement; Cargo holds ARE pressurized, and heated, too. Hmmmm...


_________________
I always think outside the box; I can't get the box open!


The_Chosen_One
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Age:54
Posts: 1,371
Location: Looking down on humanity

20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am

Typical cheap airlines though, they hire the crappiest staff who have absolutely no people skills and don't know the first thing about how to handle ADULTS complaining about the shoddy service they are receiving, let alone small children carrying on like small children. Doesn't matter whether it's Jet-star, easyjet or econojet or wtf, these attendants should consider themselves damn lucky to have a job in today's climate. Could be that they are suffering from John West syndrome, they are there because the better airlines wouldn't tolerate their sh*t. Also, being America, I'm surprised the airline isn't being sued, but those buggers would cover their arses that way too.


_________________
Pagans are people too, not just victims of a religious cleansing program. Universal harmony for all!!

Karma decides what must happen, and that includes everyone.


aspiegirl2
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Age:26
Posts: 1,463
Location: Washington, USA

21 Aug 2007, 2:05 am

Customer service is virtually non-existent on airplanes unless you're in 1st class. It sucks when you pay around $600 for a flight (just to say for the point) and then a flight attendant or a customer service guy treats you like garbage or an airline doesn't let you on the flight if you're only 1 second late or something. Then that woman getting thrown off a plane because of her baby saying "bye-bye plane" a few times and asking the mom to drug her child...that would just make me so mad.


_________________
I'm 24 years old and live in WA State. I was diagnosed with Asperger's at 9. I received a BS in Psychology in 2011 and I intend to help people with Autistic Spectrum Disorders, either through research, application, or both. On the ?Pursuit of Aspieness?.


Todd489
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,116

21 Aug 2007, 3:48 pm

Hahaha. At first I thought they literally kicked the woman and her baby off the plane at 30,000 feet or something. That's what I would do to a baby, anyway. I hate those things.



greatballzofire
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2007
Posts: 68
Location: A little cabin in the mountains

21 Aug 2007, 10:07 pm

Todd489 wrote:
Hahaha. At first I thought they literally kicked the woman and her baby off the plane at 30,000 feet or something. That's what I would do to a baby, anyway. I hate those things.

Nah, just put it in the cargo hold; it's pressurized and heated! We don't want gruesome objects falling out of the sky onto us! :lol:


_________________
I always think outside the box; I can't get the box open!


The_Chosen_One
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Age:54
Posts: 1,371
Location: Looking down on humanity

21 Aug 2007, 11:30 pm

GBOF: cargo holds are not heated; have you ever grabbed your luggage from a baggage carousel upon landing at an airport? I think they actual chill them rather than anything else.

Todd489: I'm sure the babies may feel the same about you, but unfortunately, the little buggers can't express their feelings like you can.


_________________
Pagans are people too, not just victims of a religious cleansing program. Universal harmony for all!!

Karma decides what must happen, and that includes everyone.


greatballzofire
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2007
Posts: 68
Location: A little cabin in the mountains

22 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm

The_Chosen_One wrote:
GBOF: cargo holds are not heated; have you ever grabbed your luggage from a baggage carousel upon landing at an airport? I think they actual chill them rather than anything else.

Todd489: I'm sure the babies may feel the same about you, but unfortunately, the little buggers can't express their feelings like you can.

I stand corrected, Chosen-One!
Could the rugrats be shipped separately by a UPS or FedEx spinoff? Like, by a new company, such as NannyFlight?
As for expressing their feelings, that is what the brats do best, generally at the top of their lungs!
Now as mean spirited as the above post is to babies and their long suffering and maligned parents, it is worth remembering that every one of us had at one time in our life been an irritating little infant. It's a wonder anyone survives infancy. :lol:


_________________
I always think outside the box; I can't get the box open!


The_Chosen_One
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Age:54
Posts: 1,371
Location: Looking down on humanity

23 Aug 2007, 12:28 am

Yes, being irritating little infants proves how we can exist now, using this forum. :wink: :wink: If we'd just been planted here as adults, that would prove Ragtime right, and we wouldn't want that, would we? :lol: :lol: :lol:


_________________
Pagans are people too, not just victims of a religious cleansing program. Universal harmony for all!!

Karma decides what must happen, and that includes everyone.


parts
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2005
Age:48
Posts: 1,713
Location: New England

23 Aug 2007, 7:41 am

Maybe if they drugged the rest of the people on the plane instead :lol:


_________________
"Strange is your language and I have no decoder Why don't make your intentions clear..." Peter Gabriel

http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php


greatballzofire
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2007
Posts: 68
Location: A little cabin in the mountains

23 Aug 2007, 9:15 am

The_Chosen_One wrote:
Yes, being irritating little infants proves how we can exist now, using this forum. :wink: :wink: If we'd just been planted here as adults, that would prove Ragtime right, and we wouldn't want that, would we? :lol: :lol: :lol:

http://www.hedweb.com/bgcharlton/ed-boygenius.html
I don't know what Ragtime said concerning infants, but the subject of neoteny: Neoteny (nE-'ä-t&-nE) is the retention, by adults in a species, of traits previously seen only in juveniles (pedomorphosis/paedomorphosis)came to mind.


_________________
I always think outside the box; I can't get the box open!


0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age:33
Posts: 9,544
Location: London

23 Aug 2007, 10:19 am

greatballzofire wrote:
The_Chosen_One wrote:
Yes, being irritating little infants proves how we can exist now, using this forum. :wink: :wink: If we'd just been planted here as adults, that would prove Ragtime right, and we wouldn't want that, would we? :lol: :lol: :lol:

http://www.hedweb.com/bgcharlton/ed-boygenius.html
I don't know what Ragtime said concerning infants, but the subject of neoteny: Neoteny (nE-'ä-t&-nE) is the retention, by adults in a species, of traits previously seen only in juveniles (pedomorphosis/paedomorphosis)came to mind.


nE-'ä-t&-nE make so much sense where I'm standing ;)

Well Boy Genius Charlton who wrote that article could have at least put a doctype and charest so I don't get silly ? (�) marks and so on.

The charset in the HTTP header appears to be utf-8, but caused the valuator to error and it can't check if the page is valid (first time I've seen that happen):
W3C wrote:
Error(s) blocking validation

Sorry, I am unable to validate this document because on line 45 it contained one or more bytes that I cannot interpret as utf-8 (in other words, the bytes found are not valid values in the specified Character Encoding). Please check both the content of the file and the character encoding indication.

The error was: utf8 "\x91" does not map to Unicode


If I override to iso-8859-1 I get 59 errors which isn't too bad going :D Well considering most of them are to do with non SGML characters.

So I tried Windows character set bingo! 13 errors left.