Page 1 of 1 [ 7 posts ] 

abandoned223
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2010
Posts: 1

17 Dec 2010, 6:15 pm

After taking what have been proven to be valid IQ tests for the high-range and scoring in the 140s to 150s without much time or effort I came across an article by Arthur Jensen dealing with IQ and reaction time. Because of Jensen's prominence as a scientist I felt inclined to take a RT test. Under the impression that I was going to perform well and parallel with the results of the IQ tests, I found an online test for RT and quickly took it. I was surprised to find that my reaction time is average. How can this be? Could someone pose an explanation that might clear up this discrepancy? Thanks



sluice
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Age:36
Posts: 4,568
Location: center of universe

17 Dec 2010, 7:59 pm

I don't see the correlation between the two. I do know that autism spectrum disorders have been proposed to have loopy connections, too much white matter, and perhaps too much noise. I would think that would have a negative effect on reaction time.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Posts: 41,825
Location: the island of defective toy santas

18 Dec 2010, 1:50 am

my reaction time placed me at the bottom. but i think something about my 'puter slowed things down, in the same manner as the hapless "jeopardy" contestant whose signaling device was balky.



Wombat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2006
Age:66
Posts: 2,051

18 Dec 2010, 2:28 am

I wish I could remember the link, but they did reaction speed tests on monkeys and university students and the monkeys won! :roll:



mimsy123
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2010
Age:34
Posts: 197

18 Dec 2010, 2:28 am

I have a relatively high IQ (145 on the Weschler scale), but have always had average reaction times. When I take a reaction time test, I recognize the change that's meant to trigger my response, but there seems to be some little delay that keeps me from reacting right away. I'm interested to see if any else has come across research on the subject.


_________________
Damn good, bloody good, damn good job.


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Posts: 41,825
Location: the island of defective toy santas

18 Dec 2010, 3:19 am

william shockley [i believe] had a neat parlor game thingie, where he'd hook up party guests to his IQ tester [which was basically a neural processing speed checker], and the highest scorer was a hair stylist who spoke seven languages.



skysaw
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Age:37
Posts: 622
Location: England

19 Dec 2010, 5:18 pm

abandoned223 wrote:
After taking what have been proven to be valid IQ tests for the high-range and scoring in the 140s to 150s without much time or effort I came across an article by Arthur Jensen dealing with IQ and reaction time. Because of Jensen's prominence as a scientist I felt inclined to take a RT test. Under the impression that I was going to perform well and parallel with the results of the IQ tests, I found an online test for RT and quickly took it. I was surprised to find that my reaction time is average. How can this be? Could someone pose an explanation that might clear up this discrepancy? Thanks


Since this is a forum for people with Aspergers Syndrome, this will seem like an obvious answer, but ... perhaps the fact that you have Aspergers Syndrome has something to do with it?

High IQs might well correlate with fast reaction times when you take the population as a whole, but people with Aspergers are atypical.

On a related note, most people would expect high IQ people to be brilliantly quick-witted and articulate, which is why people will often judge aspies to be less intelligent (in terms of IQ or 'g' or whatever) than they really are.