test
Board index › General Discussion › General Autism Discussion

Death-- you ever feel scared of it?

Page 4 of 7 [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Have you ever been incredibly scared of death?
Yes 35%  35%  [ 36 ]
No 60%  60%  [ 62 ]
results, please :) 6%  6%  [ 6 ]
Total votes : 104

meems
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2010
Age:28
Posts: 2,093

11 Dec 2010, 7:05 pm

I'm always afraid I'm not living enough. That makes perfect sense to me.



EmaN
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Posts: 47

11 Dec 2010, 7:05 pm

hale_bopp wrote:
Sol-IV wrote:
I don't know if 'scared' is the right word, though I do feel a kind of fear/sadness considering that my own conscious existence will perhaps come to an end. I don't think I have any phobia-level fear of it, though.

hale_bopp wrote:
Never.

It's because I know it's not the end.


I wish to point out the absence of evidence regarding this.
Not that I'm trying to start a religious debate or anything, and I suppose the concept of what (I assume) you believe can help one cope with the idea of dying.

Personally, I think that when biological function ceases, your brain included, your consciousness ceases. Which is why I am fearful, or reluctant to the concept, of death.


I'm not here to argue with a 15 year old athiest. Also, I am not religious.
Theres plenty of evidence for those with the eyes to see. If you're not one of them, thats not my problem.


Well, there's actually no credible evidence for it at all. Determining whether the evidence in question is credible or not is a complicated process, and not just a chaotic will to believe something based on reasonless emotion. This is the reason why most of the scientists are atheist - science is based on the process of evidence evaluation. Science was able to achieve more in 100 years than in all of the time of our existence excluding those 100 years.

I'm not trying to offend you in any way - I'm merely presenting you my point of view.



anbuend
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2004
Age:35
Posts: 5,482

11 Dec 2010, 7:55 pm

I'm not going to argue it at length, but there are other ways to understand the world than a particular thing that gets called "reason" and another particular thing called "emotion" and "irrationality". Both my native way of thinking, and another way of thinking that I have learned, fall under that category. I know that you can argue linguistically that there's only "reason" (again, one particular way of thinking, or a collection of similar ways of thinking) and "irrationality". But that's just semantic. There are other valid ways of thinking that can come to conclusions that aren't even possible to imagine in the kinds of thought that get called "rational" the most often. And that's just me stating... well 'belief' is another linguistic concept I don't claim, but close enough.


_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams


EmaN
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Posts: 47

11 Dec 2010, 8:09 pm

anbuend wrote:
I'm not going to argue it at length, but there are other ways to understand the world than a particular thing that gets called "reason" and another particular thing called "emotion" and "irrationality". Both my native way of thinking, and another way of thinking that I have learned, fall under that category. I know that you can argue linguistically that there's only "reason" (again, one particular way of thinking, or a collection of similar ways of thinking) and "irrationality". But that's just semantic. There are other valid ways of thinking that can come to conclusions that aren't even possible to imagine in the kinds of thought that get called "rational" the most often. And that's just me stating... well 'belief' is another linguistic concept I don't claim, but close enough.


Reason can be defined as a cognitive group of processes which deals with determination - determination of outcomes of events, determination of conclusions which can be drawn or not from experience. So far, reason has been shown to be the only process which is fit for determination. There are absolutely no other ways of thinking which are fit for evidence determination.

Conclusions which are made based on 'irrationality' are far less (I'm saying far less because humans have some instincts built in them which make them able to predict outcomes, such as presence of danger) reliable than the ones made through reasonable investigation.



Last edited by EmaN on 12 Dec 2010, 5:08 am, edited 4 times in total.

DandelionFireworks
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2010
Posts: 2,011

12 Dec 2010, 2:08 am

anbuend wrote:
I'm not going to argue it at length, but there are other ways to understand the world than a particular thing that gets called "reason" and another particular thing called "emotion" and "irrationality". Both my native way of thinking, and another way of thinking that I have learned, fall under that category. I know that you can argue linguistically that there's only "reason" (again, one particular way of thinking, or a collection of similar ways of thinking) and "irrationality". But that's just semantic. There are other valid ways of thinking that can come to conclusions that aren't even possible to imagine in the kinds of thought that get called "rational" the most often. And that's just me stating... well 'belief' is another linguistic concept I don't claim, but close enough.


Could you elaborate on alternatives? :D It sounds interesting.


_________________
I'm using a non-verbal right now. I wish you could see it. --dyingofpoetry

NOT A DOCTOR


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Posts: 17,959
Location: My house

12 Dec 2010, 5:07 am

No. I have a long ways to go before my death. And it might happen so fast I won't even know I had just died. Unless I see myself floating in the air and I see my body and realize what had just happened. I do believe in ghosts but I have no idea if you still turn into one if you have no unfinished business. I wonder if everyone turns into ghosts when they die and souls are obviously real if ghosts exist.


_________________
Titanic is a good diaper movie, lots of flooding


EmaN
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Posts: 47

12 Dec 2010, 5:07 am

DandelionFireworks wrote:
anbuend wrote:
I'm not going to argue it at length, but there are other ways to understand the world than a particular thing that gets called "reason" and another particular thing called "emotion" and "irrationality". Both my native way of thinking, and another way of thinking that I have learned, fall under that category. I know that you can argue linguistically that there's only "reason" (again, one particular way of thinking, or a collection of similar ways of thinking) and "irrationality". But that's just semantic. There are other valid ways of thinking that can come to conclusions that aren't even possible to imagine in the kinds of thought that get called "rational" the most often. And that's just me stating... well 'belief' is another linguistic concept I don't claim, but close enough.


Could you elaborate on alternatives? :D It sounds interesting.


When one enters the zoo and hears animal scream, he/she feels threatened. He/she can make decisions only based on emotion and exit the zoo.
However, the person in question can also use simple process of reasoning, and judge, by the presence of cage and other methods of security, that the situation is not threatening.



AardvarkGoodSwimmer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Age:52
Posts: 6,774
Location: Houston, Texas

12 Dec 2010, 3:11 pm

anbuend wrote:
I'm not going to argue it at length, but there are other ways to understand the world than a particular thing that gets called "reason" and another particular thing called "emotion" and "irrationality". Both my native way of thinking, and another way of thinking that I have learned, fall under that category. I know that you can argue linguistically that there's only "reason" (again, one particular way of thinking, or a collection of similar ways of thinking) and "irrationality". But that's just semantic. There are other valid ways of thinking that can come to conclusions that aren't even possible to imagine in the kinds of thought that get called "rational" the most often. And that's just me stating... well 'belief' is another linguistic concept I don't claim, but close enough.

I think it was George Solti or one of the other pretty famous conductors who said, you must learn to feel with the head and think with the heart. To me, it's the benefit of right-brain type of thinking. For example, you take a medium step because it feels right, you get feedback maybe take yet another medium step because it feels right. Later on, you might be able to logically and analytically think why that was one of the higher probability actions but it's kind of like this kind of thinking always runs behind the curve.



ocdgirl123
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2010
Age:19
Posts: 2,447

12 Dec 2010, 3:31 pm

Terrified. About every about it.



LeeAnderson
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2008
Age:23
Posts: 957
Location: Cookeville, Tennessee

12 Dec 2010, 5:16 pm

Never.



CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age:40
Posts: 92,303
Location: In a quiet and peaceful garden, where gentle Mick Avory-like Sweet Peas grow.

12 Dec 2010, 5:21 pm

Since June 27th, I've been more welcoming of a natural death. Without my mum's love and support, I'm nothing.


_________________
The darling, unworldly Mick Avory with hands like shovels, who wouldn't dare choose to hurt a soul: I'm the cuddly, adorable Kink. Sweet Peas: http://s76.photobucket.com/albums/j37/C ... 20Smileys/ Blog: http://ramblingsofasuccessfula


jakewp
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Age:44
Posts: 66

12 Dec 2010, 5:46 pm

Yes, It seems I have a different reason for this.
Because I think I tried SO SO SO hard to achieve some success and make true some of my basic dreams (which were decreasing over time) but I failed miserably.
What makes me upset is to face the lack of justice on me, and I know there's much more in this world.
To sum up, I fear the injustice that my death will close with a flourish.

I envy so much all of you that believe in life after death. I wish I had the same belief, seriously. I had it till my 20's.
I used to argue against religious people who think in life after death. I can't do it anymore just because I realized how confortable it is for all of you that believe in it and I'm jealous of that.
And in the end, maybe you're right, and I hope so :wink:


_________________
Empty yourself of everything.
Let the mind rest at peace.
The ten thousand things rise and fall while the Self watches their return.
They grow and flourish and then return to the source.
Returning to the source is stillness, which is the way of nature


MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age:24
Posts: 13,071
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

12 Dec 2010, 5:50 pm

Not afraid of the end of the road, rather how it gets there.



ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Posts: 12,900

12 Dec 2010, 5:53 pm

DandelionFireworks wrote:
I'm talking about a phobia. Not in a specific circumstance where death seemed likely (like an illness), but despite being healthy and probably young. And not just worried, but terrified of it to the extent that the mere mention of the word death is hugely upsetting?

If so, did you get over it? How? What age did you feel like this at?

NTs, please do NOT answer. I'm tempted to say it's okay to answer for a child, but then I recall shutting up and not mentioning this to my parents, so I don't think so. And I want to get an idea of what percent of the spectrum feels or felt this way.


I don't like death at all. I don't like hearing about it, talking about it, thinking about it. Whenever it comes up I just evade the subject unless it's about ghostly encounters. That's how I handle it. It's too much of a scary unknown for me to deal with effectively.


_________________
We hang around singing out everything on the radio.


anbuend
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2004
Age:35
Posts: 5,482

12 Dec 2010, 6:05 pm

DandelionFireworks wrote:
anbuend wrote:
I'm not going to argue it at length, but there are other ways to understand the world than a particular thing that gets called "reason" and another particular thing called "emotion" and "irrationality". Both my native way of thinking, and another way of thinking that I have learned, fall under that category. I know that you can argue linguistically that there's only "reason" (again, one particular way of thinking, or a collection of similar ways of thinking) and "irrationality". But that's just semantic. There are other valid ways of thinking that can come to conclusions that aren't even possible to imagine in the kinds of thought that get called "rational" the most often. And that's just me stating... well 'belief' is another linguistic concept I don't claim, but close enough.


Could you elaborate on alternatives? :D It sounds interesting.


Unfortunately neither one of them fits into language-based frameworks one at all. One of them can be alluded to but not directly described, and the other one actively seems to break all descriptions aimed at it.

I'm not sure if I made clear (from the other response I got) that these don't really fit into any description of 'rational thought' I've ever heard, but nor do they fit into 'irrational'. They're just... something else. Not emotion either.


_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams