Is math more visual or verbal?

Post Reply New Topic

Do you think a hyperverbal/hypovisual thinker or a hypervisual/hypoverbal thinker would find mathematics easier? If you think some branches are more of one mindset then the other, then please say so.

What I can tell you is that I'm neither a verbal nor a visual thinker and I'm very much a math person.

I'm a visual thinker and I'm no math person.

I got this from a learning disabilities website "Non-verbal intelligence is important in understanding math calculation and geometry" and

"Nonverbal intelligence is important because it enables students to analyze and solve complex problems without relying upon or being limited by language abilities. Many mathematical concepts, physics problems, computer science tasks, and science problems require strong reasoning skills."

I would say it's mostly visual, especially geometry.

I'm not sure what type of thinker I am, but I am very much a math person. The math class I found the hardest at the time I took it was Algebra I ( concept-wise, not grade wise), and the easiest was Geometry. I'm in second year Calculus right now, and I'm screwed as the grade is entirely based on timed tests and I don't perform as well on timed tests.

Geometry, trig, vector calculus, and a few other things rely heavily on visual thinking. Algebra, general calculus, and the like relies more on mathematical reasoning (I guess this would be more verbal?). All of it is completely interrelated though. With that said, I don't think any one form of thinking has an advantage over the other in most any area of math...99% of math (at least, disregarding the super-advanced stuff) involves memorizing a set of rules and/or formulas and just following and applying them. Some people are able to absorb it all in a heartbeat, others may struggle for years trying to solve 2+2, its just how we're wired I guess!

I'm an extremely visual person, and I love math, it comes naturally to me.
I don't see anything verbal about math. I believe that by approaching math from a verbal perspective, that will only hinder one's understanding of mathematics.

When I think of numbers, I don't think of the characters "3',"4","5" etc... or the words "three","four", or "five... I imagine visual, geometric representations of those numbers. I picture graphs & animations of mathematical operations.

I have a hard time understanding how people find math so difficult. I guess I just take my talent for granted.

There is scientific evidence (instead of only pop psychology) that there is omething as "visual thinkers" and "verbal thinkers"?

Factor analysis have really identified a thing called "verbal IQ", what could be ientified with "verbal thinking" but I don't know if the other sub-sclae ("performance IQ") could be identified with visual thinking.

No one answer can be given to the question, I think. I also think more abstract math is usually more difficult to model visually, and visual thinkers may be more efficient with less abstract math problems, eg: a simple operation involving very large numbers.

IIRC, mathematics comes under verbal ability on the standardized intelligence tests.

If that's what you mean. It makes sense too, as math is a language, whereas shapes and patterns by themselves don't require any verbal knowledge to deduce; square block goes in square hole, and it gets more and more complicated. People sometimes mistake spatial ability for mathematics.

Some fields are visual , some aren't... I think the verbal part is included in explaining ideas and will always be there , just look at the paragraphs you see when trying to explain the Riemann Integral.

The best thing to do is to switch on and off modes of thinking for the best situation.