test
Page 9 of 12 [ 168 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

Remnant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2005
Age:55
Posts: 2,073

23 Nov 2006, 1:06 pm

What a super-intelligent person loses is the ability to deceive because deception works against intelligence. The more cognitive ability a person has the worse cognitive dissonance is on him. Being lied to is also harrowing. The first time that someone lies to or about an intelligent person and hurts him that way, it is likely that the intelligent person will start to suffer badly.

The social skills that NTs allegedly have depend on deception.



DrowningMedusa
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 586

23 Nov 2006, 7:27 pm

Nexus wrote:
I mean I like these cure people to put themselves in the viewpoint of an anti-cure for once, and realize how it feels to be told in stealth, that you're basically inferior/sick; and that you need a cure for something that doesn't truly need one for; when society can simply learn to accept us and only help when we need it instead?


That's a good line, and with that I wholeheartedly agree! And sorry, I guess I did take it a bit literally. but all this debating is a good thing, it keeps us sharp and teaches us to open our minds to different viewpoints! :)



techstepgenr8tion
SomeRandomGuy
SomeRandomGuy

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age:35
Posts: 16,071
Location: Eating over the sink.

23 Nov 2006, 7:54 pm

I think about the only thing I'd really endorse is if they came up with something that could add to our capabilities - ie. add brain mass in ways to where we could be ourselves but still have enough to go around to easily hack it with NTs as well. Then again the 'having our cake and eating it too' way about it IMO is about the only way a chemical cure could actually work, otherwise it would just be prenatal screening and yeah, heightening natural selection. IMO if they haven't really sorted out whether the genome needs us or not thats still really dangerous, I still think again they're better off trying to look at things to help our deficiencies not smash where we excel and try to realign it, when they look at the fact that given more social skills a lot of us could be extremely good providers and advance society by leaps and bounds if we weren't stranded it would be really backwards and counterintuitive to try and smash us down into plain vanilla normal - they've already got enough of that to go around and isn't that a form of genetic dead-weight in and of itself?



SteveK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 3,417
Location: Chicago, IL

23 Nov 2006, 8:43 pm

techstepgenr8tion,

WELL SAID! I have always felt the same myself.

Steve



techstepgenr8tion
SomeRandomGuy
SomeRandomGuy

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age:35
Posts: 16,071
Location: Eating over the sink.

23 Nov 2006, 8:56 pm

SteveK wrote:
techstepgenr8tion,

WELL SAID! I have always felt the same myself.

Steve


I just wonder if they'll ever start doing hardcore research into nootropics again - enough to maybe find something like that. I tried Piracetam, Aniracetam, Hydergein, Picamilon, Pyritinol, and to my dismay the only things in those that really seemed to have a huge positive impact for me were the psychostimulant effects :/.



SteveK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 3,417
Location: Chicago, IL

23 Nov 2006, 9:15 pm

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
SteveK wrote:
techstepgenr8tion,

WELL SAID! I have always felt the same myself.

Steve


I just wonder if they'll ever start doing hardcore research into nootropics again - enough to maybe find something like that. I tried Piracetam, Aniracetam, Hydergein, Picamilon, Pyritinol, and to my dismay the only things in those that really seemed to have a huge positive impact for me were the psychostimulant effects :/.


Well, my only attempts with this so far have really been tyrosine and acytl-l-carnitine. ACL definately DOES help general mental health, and helps the hippocampus. The tyrosine DOES help awareness, and, if I got rid of the job concerns and retirement concerns, I SWEAR I could feel like a kid again! I actually DO get by on less "real" sleep. I'm even dreaming more and remembering more of them.

The acetyl-l-carnitine probably won't improve things with a 15 year old or younger. The tyrosine might not either. Maybe THAT is what changed me so much earlier.

Anyway, have YU tried this? What worked best for you? What were the side effects?

Steve



techstepgenr8tion
SomeRandomGuy
SomeRandomGuy

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age:35
Posts: 16,071
Location: Eating over the sink.

24 Nov 2006, 12:17 am

I think I tried Acetyl L-Carnatine - not bad stuff but definitely pricey and I think when I got the capsules they were really cracked, damp, and nasty (I think the GNC I went to got a whole bad shipment). L-tyrosine, never tried it but I definitely get it - its a dopamine precursor and anything like that'll probably have you feeling pretty good. For me I think I'm low on both dopamine and serotonin - both of which happens on a cycle I think. Another thing I need to probably pick up again is Phosphatidyl Serine and possible for a first time try Phosphatidyl Choline; both are pricey but the PS is for brain cell plasticity (so you can keep your mind in a state where it can change and learn rapidly) and I think the PC is a precursor or something that enhances the functioning of your caticholamines (sp?). As for SAMe, St. John's Wort, or anything antidepressant can't touch it - it does put me in sort of a deep blissful mood but also puts my mind in a really nasty fog where while my anxiety goes down my social functioning gets really bad, I get pathetic, and in general rather than having anxiety I'm giving myself all kinds of reasons that I should be (any prescription SSRI = more of the same).



violet_yoshi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Age:33
Posts: 1,385

24 Nov 2006, 12:27 am

Stinkypuppy wrote:

Things would be very different if we were viewed as productive members of society, rather than liabilities. I think that's the bottom line, ultimately. But it's not our fault that we are often unable to realize our full potential. While cure groups are not the cause of these problems either, they perpetuate the stereotypes by the way they draw attention to themselves and to their cause. I don't think that the cure groups are necessarily evildoers trying to inflict harm, that's not their intention, but they need education, just as everybody else does.


I think that we're considered to be liabilities, only because society has yet to give us a way to reach our full potential. It isn't that we're liabilities, it's that currently society shuts out anyone who isn't uber-NT. If that were to change, things would become better.


_________________
"Sprinkle, sprinkle, little bar, what I wonder is a cat" - Cheese from Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends


willow
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2006
Posts: 1,019
Location: florida

24 Nov 2006, 12:48 am

I still say that you all only seeing at it from your *own* viewpoint...and fail to see people much more affected.

I respect everyone's rights. hell....I don't want a cure for myself.

but I fully believe everyone deserves the choice. my sons...they have the right to know what makes them tick. they are beautiful, to me....but to them, I doubt my belief matters all that much. I am a "mom".

I love them...more than anything. ANYTHING. and they should have a choice.


so many, when responding to this topic, answer for themselves. they are happy. so screw the people who want a cure.

please....see outside the box you are looking into.



I love my boys....more than anything. I could talk for a year and you could never understand how much I love them. I feel they deserve a choice I didn't have. a CHOICE.

would I have opted to stay me? probably. then again, I am not that "socially" abnormal.


everyone deserves a choice, dammit. right or wrong, yes or no. people should be able to choose.


_________________
Hey little sister what have you done?
Hey little sister who?s the only one?


Marrshu
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 11 Oct 2006
Age:26
Posts: 129

24 Nov 2006, 12:56 am

I only support a cure for adults, and ONLY for adults. Children cannot make such a decision on their own, and parents have no right to force a child to take a cure that he or she may regret down the line.

An Adult can make such a decision, a child cannot. When someone does not have the mental ability to make a decision, can it be called anything other then forced abuse?



KBABZ
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Age:24
Posts: 6,671
Location: Middle Earth. Er, I mean Wellywood. Wait, Wellington.

24 Nov 2006, 12:58 am

What about a teenager making the decision?


_________________
I was sad when I found that she left
But then I found
That I could speak to her,
In a way
And sadness turned to comfort
We all go there


SteveK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 3,417
Location: Chicago, IL

24 Nov 2006, 10:49 am

FRANKLY, I think a CURE latter in life isn't possible. If it WAS, I would say that teenagers and adults should do it over the span of a month or more, people under 2 should NOT have it done unless PROFOUNDLY affected adversly, and others should be by a consensus of AS people.

That would be the only fair thing.

Steve



sigholdaccountlost
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Age:24
Posts: 2,740

24 Nov 2006, 10:52 am

Yeh, most cures, once introduced aren't ever voluntary. My second reason against. My first I have already stated.


_________________
<a href="http://www.kia-tickers.com><img src="http://www.kia-tickers.com/bday/ticker/19901105/+0/4/1/name/r55/s37/bday.png" border="0"> </a>


CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age:40
Posts: 92,306
Location: In a quiet and peaceful garden, where gentle Mick Avory-like Sweet Peas grow.

24 Nov 2006, 11:08 am

I'm more nationaly abormal, than anything else. It doesn't bug me. If people want a cure, than they can get it. I pesonally don't want to be cured.



Remnant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2005
Age:55
Posts: 2,073

24 Nov 2006, 11:12 am

This reminds me that I was given odd drugs to try to help me sleep when I was a teenager. None of the geniuses involved found out that I was drinking tea in the evenings, which is high in caffeine and theophylline, both of which keep me awake.

When they, that is my mother and the psychologists approached me with the suggestion that I take drugs, they approached like people who were aware that I had good reasons to refuse. It wasn't with the self-assurance of people who knew I was wrong if I refused. They acted like people who knew that I should refuse but they were going to persuade or force me anyway. What is a teenager supposed to think when he knows that they know that their behavior is unconscionable and that they will do it no matter how much force they have to use?