test
Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 

theWanderer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Age:56
Posts: 996

17 Feb 2013, 4:51 pm

Some of you may be familiar with the concept of archetypes, introduced by Jung, that suggests there are certain universal characters that naturally resonate with our unconscious. (I'm obviously, just giving a very sloppy summary here.) You may also know that there is more than one list of archetypes, drawn from literature and movies and so on. And, of those lists, some find one list more appropriate than others.

All of which got me wondering. Do those of us on the spectrum tend to prefer one of these existing lists over others? Or are there archetypes in our minds that aren't present in most popular culture? If there is anything out there on this topic, I wasn't able to find it in an admittedly quick search. But I was wondering if anyone on here had any thoughts on the subject.

The question arose because I'm a writer, and trying to learn how to consciously use archetypes in my writing, so I'm thinking through the whole idea. And, so far, I haven't had much time to think about this, but my gut instinct is that - although I recognise and respond to most if not all of the popular archetypes - I probably do have a few in my own mental landscape that aren't common to neurotypicals. My suspicion is that's why I've always had a sense of vague unease whenever I confront any of the lists of common archetypes. And that seems like a very interesting thought to pursue. :D


_________________
AQ Test = 44 Aspie Quiz = 169 Aspie 33 NT EQ / SQ-R = Extreme Systematising
===================
Not all those who wander are lost.
===================
In the country of the blind, the one eyed man - would be diagnosed with a psychological disorder


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age:115
Posts: 9,554
Location: mid atlantic coast usa

17 Feb 2013, 5:39 pm

Got any examples?

But the subject is a little like another thread (in the dating forum here) about "what is attractive?" in a person.

You can create a computer generated statistical average face ( even featured -symetrical and so on) out of surveying what hundreds of people say they find attractive. And most people would probably agree that computer generated face is attractive.

But individual people are distinct in what they find attractive.

Likewise cultures around the world hit upon similiar motiffs.
So the lists of archetypes are kind of a "statistical average" that may not apply to what speaks to each person.

Do aspies differ from nt's?

My guess is that aspies like Star Wars. And star wars was deliberately crafted by a student of Joseph Campbell out of mythical archetypes. So that would suggest the aspies have the same archetypes as everyone else.