University marks and intelligence.
I graduated with a 2:2. I had expected (and had been expected) to do better given the grades I'd got at school. I found university a real challenge but it didn't test my intelligence so much as my stamina and my ability to deal with social situations. My degree was geology so there were lots of field trips and this meant living in dormitories with a lot of very rowdy and drunk (and usually wealthy and arrogant) guys. This was total overload for me. I wouldn't sleep for nights on end and consequently I wasn't in a fit state to work well. I also found that I didn't like being out in the elements and looking back I think that was a sensory thing. If they could only have brought the rocks indoors - then I would have done fine ![]()
The more intelligent you are, the more conflicted you are.
The ideal life is blissfulness. A lifelong orgasm.
Sounds exhausting.
Also, would interfere with:
And potentially quite messy.
I am sure you don't really mean this, but I can't help but read it that way.
Also, what does " live every day like it's your last day" really mean? You would not do any long term activities like learning something complicated. Also the people I love would get irritated with constant farewells, last suppers, etc.
People have to decide how to spend their time. Most people will decide to pursue blissfulness over hardship. However, others will have some confliction that makes them do the unusual, and pursue hardship over blissfullness.
The ones who have that confliction will likely be judged *more intelligent* than the ones who choose to spend their time in bliss.
For example, where I work people will often have a M.S. or PHD degree and have a law degree. They accomplish so much because of an iternal confliction. Some want the prestige of many credentials (i.e., the 'pride' confliction), some want the money ('greed' confliction), some just have a passion for education (i.e., 'passion' confliction) ....
These conflictions cause these people to pursue hardship over bliss, and it results in them being more intelligent than those that choose the bliss of say watching tv.
Some entrepreneurs are millionaires and instead of "living the easy life" they are conflicted to invent/develop even more.
However, there are many people desiring to relax, watch tv, "life the easy life" ... and these people will likely not be judged to be as intelligent as the before mentioned people.
Last edited by LoveNotHate on 17 Mar 2015, 10:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Congratulations on graduating, despite those drunk idiots.
Do you intend on going to Grad School?
Hi Kraftiekortie,
Thanks. Yes I did mean a lower second honours.
I'm not thinking about doing any postgraduate study - I'm too old now and I wouldn't want to commit all that money to something that would be unlikely to improve my earnings.
As an ASD person, you may find your special interest more enjoyable than relaxation. However, that is not true of most people.
On a relevant "intelligence test", you would likely be judged more intelligent than the millions of people who invested their time in relaxtion / being a coach potatoe.
No, there are numerous studies including one famous one at Harvard University which finds only a weak association. Emotional intelligence is far more important for attaining academic achievement at university than IQ.
That is the most bizarre research finding I have come across in a long time. Am I right in assuming that this was another "correlation assumed to be causation" thing? As in, academic achievement correlated with relatively high EQ scores, but there was little or nothing in the research that suggested that the skills implied by high EQ scores were directly used to succeed academically?
_________________
Assume nothing; question everything.
Civilization cannot exist without exploitation.
Humans are animals.
That is the most bizarre research finding I have come across in a long time. Am I right in assuming that this was another "correlation assumed to be causation" thing? As in, academic achievement correlated with relatively high EQ scores, but there was little or nothing in the research that suggested that the skills implied by high EQ scores were directly used to succeed academically?
It makes sense to me as university drained me a lot with the social interaction rather than the actual material. It was dealing with the big crowds and people that eventually got me to quit as it was slowly driving me crazy. Specially in the high level course were small, thus, resulting in socializing with people more often.
That is the most bizarre research finding I have come across in a long time. Am I right in assuming that this was another "correlation assumed to be causation" thing? As in, academic achievement correlated with relatively high EQ scores, but there was little or nothing in the research that suggested that the skills implied by high EQ scores were directly used to succeed academically?
Yes, the emotional intelligence studies are correlation between academic achievement and EQ, not EQ causes academic achievement. In other studies studying IQ and academic achievement, it is usually found that IQ is biggest predictor of academic achievement.
_________________
Drain and plane and grain and blain your brain, and then again,
Propane and butane out of the gas main, your blain shall sustain!
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Is university a good measure of intelligence? |
02 Mar 2011, 12:23 pm |
| Intelligence, social intelligence, aliens and dolphins. |
07 Sep 2011, 5:21 am |
| Fast Intelligence versus Slow Intelligence |
20 Mar 2011, 7:39 pm |
| Uni marks |
07 Sep 2011, 9:50 pm |


