What is YOUR definition of neurotypical?

Page 2 of 3 [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

SaveFerris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,762
Location: UK

09 Feb 2017, 12:30 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
I never realised it wasn't a word used by the medical profesion. The word has just lost all credability with me :roll:


Why?

NT means "non autistic". Autistic IS a medical term. So just because the medical community never got around to making up a term for folks who dont fit one of their categories doesnt mean that lay persons cant making up a term for "all people who dont fit in a [particular medical category]".


It's a word I only use here and it's perfect for describing someone who does not have autism ( not technically what it means ) but apart from that , that's it , I thought there was a deeper meaning to it , as you can see from my comments above. I might just start using the word clowncake instead as it will mean exactly the same to me :P

Q: Why did the clowncake cross the road?
A: To get to the other side. (clowncakes are so damn practical it’s sickening.)


_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1

Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard


TuesdaysChild
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2017
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 44

09 Feb 2017, 12:36 pm

I would say a brain functioning at its optimal performance. Non-NT would deviate from the optimum in some way or another. I don't even know that I would equate "typical" with "majority" since it's entirely possible that a majority has some form of deviation from optimal neurological performance.


_________________
Like the crackling of thorns under the pot, so is the laughter of fools. ~ Solomon
I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself. ~ D.H. Lawrence


Joe90
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 26,492
Location: UK

09 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm

SaveFerris wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
I never realised it wasn't a word used by the medical profesion. The word has just lost all credability with me :roll:


Why?

NT means "non autistic". Autistic IS a medical term. So just because the medical community never got around to making up a term for folks who dont fit one of their categories doesnt mean that lay persons cant making up a term for "all people who dont fit in a [particular medical category]".


It's a word I only use here and it's perfect for describing someone who does not have autism ( not technically what it means ) but apart from that , that's it , I thought there was a deeper meaning to it , as you can see from my comments above. I might just start using the word clowncake instead as it will mean exactly the same to me :P

Q: Why did the clowncake cross the road?
A: To get to the other side. (clowncakes are so damn practical it’s sickening.)


Clowncake is funny, let's try using that.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:


_________________
Female


horseguy2u
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 40
Location: Pennsylvania USA

09 Feb 2017, 1:08 pm

There is a dimension to this that is neither NT or AS. It's context or how a culture perceives diversity. In western culture uniformity is valued and diversity is often not valued, and anything diverse or outside the norm gets labeled as useless or a threat as a result.

I knew an old Cherokee medicine man who told me that Native American culture placed little value on uniformity. He gave the example of 20-20 vision and how everyone's eyesight is corrected to this standard in European culture. In his culture he said that farsighted meant you were a hunter and nearsighted meant you did intricate bead work. Diversity was their means to complete all the tasks that his culture needed to accomplish. Apparently the AS people were the Shamans.


_________________
Socialization is overrated.


idonthaveanickname
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 5 Feb 2014
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 163
Location: Chicago, IL

09 Feb 2017, 1:49 pm

horseguy2u wrote:
idonthaveanickname wrote:
To me, neurotypical means that the neurons in the brain are functioning normally, like they typically should.


I agree with this until I get to the word "should".

Ok, maybe I should've explained that differently. Sorry. I don't really know how else to describe what my definition of neurotypical is. But doesn't everyone have at least something neurologically wrong with them to some degree? Is neurological supposed to mean normal? Maybe it's just me thinking this way.



Joe90
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 26,492
Location: UK

09 Feb 2017, 1:58 pm

I like what horseguy2u says. It depends on context. There is a line drawn somewhere. It's hard to explain where it is. It's all about dimension.


_________________
Female


horseguy2u
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 40
Location: Pennsylvania USA

09 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm

idonthaveanickname wrote:
horseguy2u wrote:
idonthaveanickname wrote:
To me, neurotypical means that the neurons in the brain are functioning normally, like they typically should.


I agree with this until I get to the word "should".

Ok, maybe I should've explained that differently. Sorry. I don't really know how else to describe what my definition of neurotypical is. But doesn't everyone have at least something neurologically wrong with them to some degree? Is neurological supposed to mean normal? Maybe it's just me thinking this way.


There is a scientific/statistical word "norm". DEFINITION - Norms are statistics that describe the test performance of a well-defined population.

The test of performance can be of anything, running, jumping, problem solving, holding your breath, etc. I believe the word "normal" is more or less slang developed from the statistical word "norm". It has more of a vague cultural meaning compared to the scientific /statistical word "norm". Being vague in its nature "normal" can be applied to many things in the common sloppy way that people tend to use language. Or it can be used against people, as it often is against people with diverse brain wiring diagrams to make the feel less that the person using the word "normal" against them.

I tend to think of "normal" as describing and having the importance of a high school cafeteria table clique.


_________________
Socialization is overrated.


mr_bigmouth_502
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Dec 2013
Age: 30
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 7,028
Location: Alberta, Canada

09 Feb 2017, 4:05 pm

CharityGoodyGrace wrote:
Is it...

1) People who hate AS?
2) People who hate Aspies?
3) People who identify as normal, whatever the hell that means?
4) People who identify as non-autistic?
5) People diagnosed as non-autistic, by a person who thinks in black and white?

...anything else?

I know there's a lot of anti-NT sentiment on this site, considering that many of us have had negative experiences with them at some point, but NT does NOT equal hatred of AS or people with it. All it means is someone with typical neurology, someone who lacks conditions like autism, OCD, or ADHD. Arguably, of these, autistic individuals are the least close to "neurotypical", but this is just a theory, since anecdotal evidence suggests that autism causes bigger changes in things like behavior and perception than the other conditions I've named.

Anyway, this whole "us vs. them" thing is something I've been seeing a lot on this site, and I think it's only making us look bad. It's understandable, sure, but it almost reminds me of how words like "autist", "autism", "autistic", etc. have become pejorative terms across the wider internet.

Neurotypical = someone with typical neurology, end of story.


_________________
Every day is exactly the same...


iliketrees
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Mar 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,155
Location: Earth

09 Feb 2017, 4:08 pm

horseguy2u wrote:
a well-defined population

A very important condition that does not apply here.



nurseangela
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,017
Location: Kansas

09 Feb 2017, 4:13 pm

A person without autism. NT's can have OCD, ADHD, anxiety, depression, etc.


_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.

Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.


horseguy2u
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 40
Location: Pennsylvania USA

09 Feb 2017, 4:29 pm

Regarding "us vs. them" and making us look bad...

I am old. I am tied. I have used immeasurable amounts of energy developing, refining and applying compensations for my socialization challenges in order to live, work and survive. All I ask for now as I am aging and have less energy to support my façade of socialization is what the legal profession calls "reasonable accommodations". If you are physically disabled an have to go to court, there are plenty of ramps and elevators. Same with curb cuts crossing the street.

I have experienced almost no reasonable accommodations for my disability, in fact it has cost me dearly many times. I always think of Rosa Parks. She was not a civil rights advocate. She was just tired riding a bus and the law said she had to give up her seat to a white person, something she had done all her life. But on that famous day on the bus, she was too tired to get up and she started a big change. I feel like her a lot. I am just too tired now to "fit in", to give them my seat on the bus.

So, my advice to you who are young and struggling is to secure your rights and the same level of reasonable accommodations that physically challenged people receive now before you get too old and tired because "them" are not going to give those accommodations to "us" in a gift wrapped package. We are probably going to have to fight for them, and in doing so, yes, we might "look bad" but I am too tired to care.


_________________
Socialization is overrated.