test

Rant about people with "self-diagnosed" AS

Page 6 of 12 [ 176 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 12  Next

Sophist
Professor of Pedantry
Professor of Pedantry

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Age:34
Posts: 6,379
Location: Louisville, KY

05 May 2008, 8:57 am

darkstone100 wrote:
the problem i have is this, I worry that i've just convinced myself that i have AS, I mean if you study on something and then you take a test on it, like the aspie quiz you can take on this site, you can fool it because you can find the right questions to answer to sound more like an aspie. how can they make a test where you can't fool it, makes people who really want to know if they have AS not get a diagnosis because they think they just fooled the system.


It can be very difficult to design such a test. What you're talking about here is Face Validity. Face validity means an instrument is measuring what it seems to be measuring; a certain amount of face validity is desirable. However, too much and the problem is that the testee can also tell what the tool is meant to be measuring and can more easily fool the test and get the score they want.

The MMPI-2 is a good example of a test which has appropriate face validity yet also has built in traps essentially to make sure a person is answering as honestly as possible.

But you're right, using a quiz or even a few (since most of the quizzes out there have excellent face validity) doesn't diagnostically suffice for exactly the reason you brought up.

Other ways to counter that while not completely redesigning the test itself would be to have another person, like a parent, who knows you well to fill it out and compare answers. Now, as far as some issues, like maybe sensory issues and sexual issues, they won't know as much, but for other things, like your history, it'd be easier to match their answers to yours to make sure you're not exaggerating or making too light of things.

In a diagnostic assessment, if such a tool is used, hopefully the interview portion of the assessment will always bring some balance, as well as an interview with your parents or other family. It's for that reason in diagnostics that the diagnostician never uses just a single tool but usually a collection of things, including interview.


_________________
My Science blog, Science Over a Cuppa - http://insolemexumbra.wordpress.com/

My partner's autism science blog, Cortical Chauvinism - http://corticalchauvinism.wordpress.com/


anbuend
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2004
Age:35
Posts: 5,482

05 May 2008, 9:22 am

Sophist wrote:
The MMPI-2 is a good example of a test which has appropriate face validity yet also has built in traps essentially to make sure a person is answering as honestly as possible.


If those built-in traps are so great, why do they detect more "dishonesty" the more educated the people taking it are?

Also, I know one of the validity scales on that thing measures whether you have the same answer when the question is asked in a different manner, which can trip up both people who are extremely literal and do see a difference, and also people whose answer is really "in between yes and no" who answer it differently every time because they're really indifferent to the question? And, in the scale that measures validity by saying things that are supposedly true of everyone, what about people those things might not be true of?

Not only that, but there is so much on that test that gives inaccurate results when taken literally. For instance, "do you ever lie?" could mean if the person had ever deliberately omitted information they didn't want to talk about, or ever told a white lie, they might say yes, whereas someone else who thought "lie" meant major lies would say no. And same with "take things that don't belong to you," which a person could interpret as many things other than theft, or other than serious theft, and which would also depend heavily on the person's notion of property. And so forth.


_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams


Zancaur
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 24

05 May 2008, 9:24 am

Edit: Post removed.



Last edited by Zancaur on 08 May 2008, 8:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

Sophist
Professor of Pedantry
Professor of Pedantry

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Age:34
Posts: 6,379
Location: Louisville, KY

05 May 2008, 9:53 am

anbuend wrote:
Sophist wrote:
The MMPI-2 is a good example of a test which has appropriate face validity yet also has built in traps essentially to make sure a person is answering as honestly as possible.


If those built-in traps are so great, why do they detect more "dishonesty" the more educated the people taking it are?

Also, I know one of the validity scales on that thing measures whether you have the same answer when the question is asked in a different manner, which can trip up both people who are extremely literal and do see a difference, and also people whose answer is really "in between yes and no" who answer it differently every time because they're really indifferent to the question? And, in the scale that measures validity by saying things that are supposedly true of everyone, what about people those things might not be true of?

Not only that, but there is so much on that test that gives inaccurate results when taken literally. For instance, "do you ever lie?" could mean if the person had ever deliberately omitted information they didn't want to talk about, or ever told a white lie, they might say yes, whereas someone else who thought "lie" meant major lies would say no. And same with "take things that don't belong to you," which a person could interpret as many things other than theft, or other than serious theft, and which would also depend heavily on the person's notion of property. And so forth.


I'm afraid I don't know the MMPI-2 well enough to knowingly respond to this. It sounds like you've studied it more than I have.

Zancaur wrote:
Edit: By the way, where can I take the aspie test you were talking about?


http://www.rdos.net/eng/Aspie-quiz.php


_________________
My Science blog, Science Over a Cuppa - http://insolemexumbra.wordpress.com/

My partner's autism science blog, Cortical Chauvinism - http://corticalchauvinism.wordpress.com/


Mikomi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jan 2008
Age:37
Posts: 811
Location: On top of your TV, lookin' at you funny.

05 May 2008, 10:02 am

LostInSpace wrote:
My diagnostician also asked if I wanted just a verbal diagnosis...


I have that much, a verbal diagnosis. I just prefer to keep my problems off of paper. Whether people do or not is purely up to them and their specific situation, in my opinion.


_________________
Curiosity is not a mental illness.
Homeschooling Aspie mom of 2 kiddos on the Spectrum.


Zancaur
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 24

05 May 2008, 10:04 am

I scored 136 of 200 on the aspie quiz. My neurotypical score was 60 of 200.



Mikomi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jan 2008
Age:37
Posts: 811
Location: On top of your TV, lookin' at you funny.

05 May 2008, 10:13 am

Zancaur wrote:
This is not a superiority issue, I'm just afraid of the syndrome becoming a farce, that no-one will take my claims seriously.


And I can understand your concern. It happened with Fibromyalgia. When I was diagnosed with that by a rheumatologist I stormed out of her office because I truly believed the diagnosis was a total B.S. diagnosis. It took me two more years of pain and debilitating fatigue AND a second opinion to finally admit she might be right. I've been suffering with the symptoms since I was about 12.

Zancaur wrote:

I am sorry if I offended anyone.


It's all good.


_________________
Curiosity is not a mental illness.
Homeschooling Aspie mom of 2 kiddos on the Spectrum.


blue_bean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 9,952
Location: Behind the wheel

05 May 2008, 10:15 am

Quote:
If you have the resources to get diagnosed, but do not do so and still claim to have AS, I will not take you seriously.


But you still haven't seemed to absorb all the other reasons people have to not get diagnosed. :?
Do you need me to summarise them for you?

You make it sound like getting a diagnosis is easy, as it probably was for you because (a) you were a kid, more services for kids, and (b) you were financially dependant.
If you can point me to a place that specialises in Adult Diagnosis that is within 6 hours drive of my geographical location AND doesn't have a two year waiting list, I'd like to hear.



t0
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2008
Age:41
Posts: 1,004
Location: The 4 Corners of the 4th Dimension

05 May 2008, 10:54 am

Zancaur wrote:
If you have the resources to get diagnosed, but do not do so and still claim to have AS, I will not take you seriously.


As a consequence, then, you (the diagnosed AS) don't get to claim any accomplishments by any non-diagnosed (or non-verifiable diagnosed) people. That includes anyone who died before AS was added to the DSM.



sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Posts: 15,266
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, OR 97411

05 May 2008, 11:04 am

Zancaur wrote:
I scored 136 of 200 on the aspie quiz. My neurotypical score was 60 of 200.


Hello Zancaur,
thanks for the apology. I understand about not knowing how it is with other people and how we think that our circumstances are universal. I do understand why you would not want to feel 'not normal' and less of a person in other people's eyes. It feels pretty rotten!

I scored 187/200 my first time on the Aspie quiz and 10/200 neurotypical, until some one here on WP suggested I do it with out taking into consideration all the decades I have had to adapt in neurotypical society. Then my score was higher in the former and lower in the latter.

The most eye opening for me was in the face recognition tests, where I scored about 32% recognition. now THAT was amazing to me, as I realized I had not been able to tell people apart in movies, or in real life, either.


If it is any comfort, just remember that out of all the world, Aspies come to WP, so it just SEEMS like there are a lot more of us in the world. In real time/non internet life, we are quite rare, actually.

all the best,
Merle



Specter
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2008
Age:24
Posts: 1,210
Location: Alaska

05 May 2008, 11:14 am

Zancaur wrote:
Hi there.
I'm a 16 year old male with Asperger's, and I was diagnosed 10 years ago.
Recently, as I am sure you are all aware, the amount of people claiming to have Asperger's without actually being diagnosed, has risen. Now, this really makes me mad. Just because you are an eccentric, antisocial nerd with nearly no friends does not mean you have a disability! You are giving the REAL aspies who actually are making an effort to improve their social skills, a bad name. If you are so sure that you have AS, go and get yourself diagnosed. If you do not do this, you are in my mind, and probably in the minds of many other people with AS, not an aspie by default.

Just because you are an antisocial geek does not mean you have AS, and vice versa.

Not as scornful as I thought it would be, I must be losing my flare :P


that is very harsh. You have to keep in mind that Asperger Syndrome is much easier to diagnose as a child, and for those of us who have matured past the optimal age of diagnosis have great difficulties just getting a diagnosis. And that's not to mention all of those who grew up before there were standard diagnosis criteria. It is NEVER and I repeat NEVER!! okay to say that someone is an "eccentric, antisocial nerd with nearly no friends". I think that at the moment, you seem to epitomize antisocial. You can hold whatever opinions you may, but don't hark on other people who are exactly like you, but have been less fortunate as to receiving an official diagnosis.

and before you start, no, I am not "self-diagnosed;" I have been referred to many licensed psychology professionals, none of whom can reach an easy consensus, especially now due to my age.
Even if I did have an "official diagnosis" I would find you to be abrasive, a bigot, and someone obviously suffering from a superiority complex. Good day to you.


_________________
"there is no spoon"


Specter
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2008
Age:24
Posts: 1,210
Location: Alaska

05 May 2008, 11:21 am

Zancaur wrote:
sinsboldly wrote:
Zancaur wrote:
Hi there.
I'm a 16 year old male with Asperger's, and I was diagnosed 10 years ago.
Recently, as I am sure you are all aware, the amount of people claiming to have Asperger's without actually being diagnosed, has risen. Now, this really makes me mad. Just because you are an eccentric, antisocial nerd with nearly no friends does not mean you have a disability! You are giving the REAL aspies who actually are making an effort to improve their social skills, a bad name. If you are so sure that you have AS, go and get yourself diagnosed. If you do not do this, you are in my mind, and probably in the minds of many other people with AS, not an aspie by default.

Just because you are an antisocial geek does not mean you have AS, and vice versa.

Not as scornful as I thought it would be, I must be losing my flare :P


for a 16 year old male you are doing pretty good with the scorn thing.

Back when I was 16 (1966)they did tests on me to figure out what was wrong with me, and couldn't find anything they could measure, so they said I was 'wayward' and put me into a mental institution because they didn't know what else to do with me. (how I dealt with getting out is a story I have often told on WP, so I won't give it here) When I was older (1976) I tried to get some sort of understanding but I wasn't the latest discovery (Bi-Polar) so I didn't qualify. Later still I again did some testing (1992, the year of your birth)and as close they could come was Cyclothymic, but even that they said was iffy. It wasn't until 2006 that I even HEARD of Asperger's Syndrome and once I read the DSM iv codes I was ready to go to the first psychologist with the news and ready to take the testing again.

Unfortunately, the psychology standards are not moving all that quickly on any sort of tests for people in their late 50's, as it is all for children and teenagers, and I have been put off with excuses as "you have learned how to deal with it, why would you want to be diagnosed at all?" And it is very expensive, did you know that? Did someone else pay for your diagnosis or did you save it up from your newspaper route?


So, when you get on your high little horse about the diagnosis SOMEONE ELSE HAS PAID FOR, please remember there are some other folks less fortunate than yourself.

And guess who is giving Aspies a bad name, now?


No need to get hostile. I was simply pointing out that you cannot claim to be an aspie without being diagnosed (of course, there are exceptions, such as in your case). Just because you have some aspie traits, does not mean you have AS. I was referring mostly to the people who CAN get a diagnosis, yet they do not make the effort.


NO NEED TO GET HOSTILE?? Are you serious? You must be joking. >.> After going out of your way to target a group of people who have done absolutely nothing wrong to you, you tell someone else that there is no need to get hostile?

Don't make a blanket accusation, and then pull some punches just because your argument is obviously flawed. If that is seriously your opinion, then I suggest the first thing you do is alter/remove this thread.


_________________
"there is no spoon"


Specter
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2008
Age:24
Posts: 1,210
Location: Alaska

05 May 2008, 11:30 am

IdahoRose wrote:
I agree. People act like they want AS, like it'll make them feel more special or something. I get really pissed off when I hear of people who practically beg their doctors for a diagnosis.


hmm, technically that would exclude people like me, but I suspect includes the creator of this thread.


_________________
"there is no spoon"


Specter
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2008
Age:24
Posts: 1,210
Location: Alaska

05 May 2008, 11:36 am

Sorry to you all for the late posts, but I've been out the last few days, and missed out on one heck of a counter-rant. :D Anyways, I think I'm done (for now)

congrats to the thread creator for one thing; this is the only thread I've ever felt compelled to read every page of. I'll let you know how mad I still am in six pages :D


_________________
"there is no spoon"


KingdomOfRats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Age:31
Posts: 5,313
Location: f'ton,manchester UK

05 May 2008, 11:56 am

am have at least three aspies in family-dad,sister and uncle.
neither dad or sister are bothered about diagnosis because they have been hf enough to cope.
sister is a councilor and dad still works as a fork lift driver in his sixties-both of them own their own houses,why would they need to get diagnosed when they dont have any need for it?

why should people have to prove themselves to others,unless they need some sort of support/help?

most self diagnosed WPers overstate they are self diagnosed, because of this elitism,that is not faking.

a undiagnosed aspie,autie or spectrumer is the same as many diagnosed on the spectrum-they went through the same difficulties,the same challenges and the same differences-the only difference between them being one group has it written down that they have it.


why bother about what others have and dont have,what is the point? what harm are they doing?,use wps ignore settings if self diagnosed users bother that much.


_________________
>severely autistic.
>>the residential autist; http://theresidentialautist.blogspot.co.uk
blogging from the view of an ex institutionalised autism/ID activist now in community care.
>>>help to keep bullying off our community,report it!