Women who throw themselves at men on dating sites

Page 11 of 19 [ 278 posts ] Go to page Previous 1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 19 Next

Previous topic | Next topic

AspieRogue

27 Nov 2012, 7:05 pm

TrainofLove wrote:

I would never give any ugly or fat person a chance.

*crickets chirping*

sbarne3
Snowy Owl

Joined: 8 Jan 2010
Age:36
Posts: 127
Location: Texas

27 Nov 2012, 8:06 pm

nessa238 wrote:

sbarne3 wrote:

nessa238 wrote:

sbarne3 wrote:

nessa238 wrote:

We're all waiting for the OP to continue with his thread!

What else could be said that hasn't already been repeated over and over.
The horse is dead so why continue beating it?
Careful or someone might decide to call PETA

What is it with OPs not wanting their threads to be utilised for debate outside of a strictly
subject and time-limited range?

I thought that was what forums were for ie general debate

So many rules....

Debate is fine with me, but there comes a time when people start saying the same thing over and over again to try to prove their point and no new perspectives are being introduced
Imo it is pointless to keep going after that. It makes about as much sense as beating a dead horse.

I thought we were covering a range of topics - people are adding new insights all the time

What were you expecting?

You seem to be far too demanding of conversational content - you're making me feel very inadequate!

wow... you must be really bored

_________________
AQ score= 37
Aspie score: 143 of 200
NT Score: 63 of 200
EQ=15 (low) SQ=27 (average)
Alexithymia Quiz=128/185 (high)
Enneagram type: 5 ("The Investigator")

Palakol
Toucan
Toucan

Joined: 2 Aug 2011
Age:35
Posts: 258

27 Nov 2012, 8:24 pm

Where do you find these women?

EDIT: Wait, I realized that I have encountered a few of these. They tried to sell me stuff, get me to join websites, send them money through Western Union, ask for my credit card information, or charge me $300 an hour for "incall". Real turnoff for me too.

_________________
Valar Morghulis

wtfid2
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 9 Aug 2012
Age:26
Posts: 1,712
Location: usa

27 Nov 2012, 8:47 pm

AspieRogue wrote:

nessa238 wrote:

AspieRogue wrote:

MXH wrote:

mv wrote:

Here's the most interesting part, to me, from the "10 fake profiles" experiment:

Violet Blue wrote:

Millward found out that the pretty-girl-gets-attention thing is not brain surgery, but online it's just like in real life - but that kind of attention is, like, on steroids.

However, after digging into it deeper he backed away from the statement that "women have it easier" when it comes to online dating.

Instead Millward concluded that while women may have wider selection capabilities, a number of girls are faced with a signal to noise ratio that can render the selection process into a null.

{emphasis mine}

The problem with that wording is it depends for the classification. on the top side of the scale, it seems about equal. Since the women have so much to choose from they just cant go through it all and the guys at that range have more than enough to be picky about. But once you move down the ladder the shift tends to go the way of men not having much in the way of options compared to women of their own bracket

Most women I talk to who use online dating, EVEN ones who are ugly by my standards and whine about men not liking them, still get plenty of messages from guys on sites like okcupid. Most women on the sites that I use tell me that the get new messages at least once a week and sometimes nearly every day. For me, it goes in spurts. And for the last 4 months I haven't gotten any messages from new persons on okstupid.

OK Cupid's a waste of time - never met a single person off there. Plenty of Fish has better odds.

I beg to differ. I had a profile on POF twice and for a year each time and got zero messages or replies. I've actually me A LOT of people on okcupid and gone on quite a few dates.

It also has forums which are extremely entertaining. Unlike POF's forums which are heavily moderated. Not many unconventional peeps on POF in my area. Also, POF just isn't nearly as fun as okcupid; the best dating site on Earth.

okcupid forums are a disaster. there are no mods and people post s**t that makes 0 sense. pof forums are full of stuck up dried out women and limp dick men but still the posts there make sense.

_________________
AQ 25

Your Aspie score: 101 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 111 of 200
You seem to have both Aspie and neurotypical traits

Betzalel
Deinonychus

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Age:35
Posts: 365

27 Nov 2012, 10:09 pm

AspieRogue wrote:

A lot of fat chicks actually do have guys wanting to sleep with them despite mainstream societies insistence that they're ugly. But beanpole gals, particularly those who are boyish in dress and appearance, seem to get N0 *love* from men.

They would get plenty of love from me. I actually like that look.

sbarne3
Snowy Owl

Joined: 8 Jan 2010
Age:36
Posts: 127
Location: Texas

27 Nov 2012, 10:14 pm

Betzalel wrote:

AspieRogue wrote:

They would get plenty of love from me. I actually like that look.

Me too

_________________
AQ score= 37
Aspie score: 143 of 200
NT Score: 63 of 200
EQ=15 (low) SQ=27 (average)
Alexithymia Quiz=128/185 (high)
Enneagram type: 5 ("The Investigator")

sbarne3
Snowy Owl

Joined: 8 Jan 2010
Age:36
Posts: 127
Location: Texas

27 Nov 2012, 10:20 pm

AspieRogue wrote:

I've actually me A LOT of people on okcupid and gone on quite a few dates.

Wait... OkCupid has forums? Where?

_________________
AQ score= 37
Aspie score: 143 of 200
NT Score: 63 of 200
EQ=15 (low) SQ=27 (average)
Alexithymia Quiz=128/185 (high)
Enneagram type: 5 ("The Investigator")

AspieRogue

27 Nov 2012, 11:51 pm

sbarne3 wrote:

AspieRogue wrote:

I've actually me A LOT of people on okcupid and gone on quite a few dates.

Wait... OkCupid has forums? Where?

Exhibit A

sbarne3
Snowy Owl

Joined: 8 Jan 2010
Age:36
Posts: 127
Location: Texas

28 Nov 2012, 12:00 am

AspieRogue wrote:

sbarne3 wrote:

AspieRogue wrote:

I've actually me A LOT of people on okcupid and gone on quite a few dates.

Wait... OkCupid has forums? Where?

Exhibit A

thanks for the link... strangely if I am signed in then that link just takes me to the home page
If I sign out then it works

_________________
AQ score= 37
Aspie score: 143 of 200
NT Score: 63 of 200
EQ=15 (low) SQ=27 (average)
Alexithymia Quiz=128/185 (high)
Enneagram type: 5 ("The Investigator")

TrainofLove
Velociraptor

Joined: 31 Jul 2012
Age:19
Posts: 417
Location: New Zealand

28 Nov 2012, 12:20 am

AspieRogue wrote:

TrainofLove wrote:

I would never give any ugly or fat person a chance.

*crickets chirping*

Well why would I give someone a chance when I don't find them the slightest bit attractive?

_________________
"He was slower than a nudist trying to climb a barbed wire fence" - Benny Hill

MXH
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age:24
Posts: 13,071
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

28 Nov 2012, 1:01 am

TrainofLove wrote:

AspieRogue wrote:

TrainofLove wrote:

I would never give any ugly or fat person a chance.

*crickets chirping*

Well why would I give someone a chance when I don't find them the slightest bit attractive?

because attraction builds

DerStadtschutz
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age:29
Posts: 1,467

28 Nov 2012, 6:26 am

nessa238 wrote:

Myself and my partner of choice are overweight and we have flipping fantastic sex! 'Mainstream society' can find us as unappealing as it likes - we're having all the fun!

Indeed...

DerStadtschutz
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age:29
Posts: 1,467

28 Nov 2012, 6:35 am

nessa238 wrote:

Or in other words, why do average to unattractive-looking men not want to be with their equal in looks but somehow think they have a God-given right to be with Miss Supermodel Princess?!? Lol

I see the same thing happening on both sides, honestly, although with women what often seems to be considered more important are things like a nice car, nice clothes, large salary, owning a home, etc.

DerStadtschutz
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age:29
Posts: 1,467

28 Nov 2012, 6:42 am

hyperlexian wrote:

just because the man didn't get any initial messages didn't mean he wouldn't get any replies to the messages he sent. you are conveniently disregarding the fact that men send the majority of initial messages on dating sites, so of course women will end up getting more messages overall.

and your list still didn't work because some of the men got more messages than some of the women - even though the onus is on the men to send initial messages. so some of the men would have had not only initial messages from women but also replies from women. the study didn't show that.

your basic premise is flawed. if it corrected for the proportion of initial messages sent by men (5 to 1? 10 to 1?) then we might have data that could be compared across genders.

These are all very good points. I wanted to add to this, it also isn't considering who the men are sending messages to. Obviously the "attractive" women get more messages, so that must mean that the "ugly" guys are trying to date "out of their league," which is what I've been trying to get at since the first time I laid eyes on a thread like this. Otherwise the messages would be more evenly spaced. That, and guys would probably have more success too.

DerStadtschutz
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age:29
Posts: 1,467

28 Nov 2012, 6:49 am

DialAForAwesome wrote:

TrainofLove wrote:

wtfid2 wrote:

I dont belive the ''11'' girl only got 11.she isnt even all that ugly.

What planet are you on?

agreed with wtfid, sorta. Except I'd go as far to say that I actually think she's cute.

I don't know if I'd call her cute, but she's far from ugly. And I bet she has some nice curves...

Page 11 of 19 [ 278 posts ] Go to page Previous 1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 19 Next

Jump to:

Women who throw themselves at men on dating sites Post Reply New Topic

Women who throw themselves at men on dating sites