Recieved /Sent Okc percentage
In the okcupid's inbox, there's usually 28 messages displayed per page (let's consider the last page is full too) so by multiplying this number by the number of pages you can get a fairly accurate number of the received and sent messages.
I start (with my newly created account created on 11 august):
Sent: 28*7 = 196
Received: 28*3 = 84
84/196 = 42.8%
which means that almost ~42.8% of the messages I sent have been replied. Surely it's not highly accurate (I estimate it's even 5 to 10% less than that)
I guess this calculation only makes sense for the males though (sense they are the "Senders") ; maybe the females should calculate Sent/Recieved instead to get the estimated % of how often they reply to the messages they receive.
Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 25 Dec 2012, 4:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
No idea. Go to my profile and tell me what the reply thing says /shrug :p
On a NZ dating site my reply ratio is 9%.
But you have to realise most of the people on there can't even string a sentence together.
_________________
New dating site for geeks:
http://www.ingeeklove.com
My latest youtube video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RnfTXt-Tu4
On a NZ dating site my reply ratio is 9%.
But you have to realise most of the people on there can't even string a sentence together.
but i good rite very! u want f*k 2nite?
(I hear you... for those of use who appreciate what we learned in GRADE SCHOOL, seeing a decently-written message is rare!)
On a NZ dating site my reply ratio is 9%.
But you have to realise most of the people on there can't even string a sentence together.
but i good rite very! u want f*k 2nite?
(I hear you... for those of use who appreciate what we learned in GRADE SCHOOL, seeing a decently-written message is rare!)
Here's an example of what I've been messaged recently. I'll grab 5 random messages.
"hello"
"Love to get into your pants lol mmmm!" - (From a 56 year old... yuck!)
"Hi"
"Want to sit on me and ride me as long as you want?" (pass)
"hi miss i think tooooo much sometimes it gives me a headache.lol"
And people wonder why they don't get replied to.
_________________
New dating site for geeks:
http://www.ingeeklove.com
My latest youtube video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RnfTXt-Tu4
On a NZ dating site my reply ratio is 9%.
But you have to realise most of the people on there can't even string a sentence together.
but i good rite very! u want f*k 2nite?
(I hear you... for those of use who appreciate what we learned in GRADE SCHOOL, seeing a decently-written message is rare!)
Here's an example of what I've been messaged recently. I'll grab 5 random messages.
"hello"
"Love to get into your pants lol mmmm!" - (From a 56 year old... yuck!)
"Hi"
"Want to sit on me and ride me as long as you want?" (pass)
"hi miss i think tooooo much sometimes it gives me a headache.lol"
And people wonder why they don't get replied to.
I usually ignore anyone who replies 'hi' and 'hello'. I have yet to receive a sexual message from anyone. Lol
I got lucky; Being a gentleman has its perks
_________________
Okay people, bring me a spatula, some tanks, and an anenome! Sh*t's gettin' real tonight!
SKYPE meh!: thegreengiddly
On a NZ dating site my reply ratio is 9%.
But you have to realise most of the people on there can't even string a sentence together.
but i good rite very! u want f*k 2nite?
(I hear you... for those of use who appreciate what we learned in GRADE SCHOOL, seeing a decently-written message is rare!)
Here's an example of what I've been messaged recently. I'll grab 5 random messages.
"hello"
"Love to get into your pants lol mmmm!" - (From a 56 year old... yuck!)
"Hi"
"Want to sit on me and ride me as long as you want?" (pass)
"hi miss i think tooooo much sometimes it gives me a headache.lol"
And people wonder why they don't get replied to.
i would reply to each and every one of those, with a critique. something like:
....and then i blocked them before they could reply.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt237032.html
40%?! For a guy, that's pretty damn good. Most guys only receive a less than 2% response rate.
Of course, OkCupid is one of the easier dating sites to connect with women on. On Match, I feel sometimes that the women are too preppy/stuck-up, especially the hot ones, but I also have to take into consideration that over half the women on Match who posted profiles don't have a paid account and thus can't reply. Same thing with eHarmony. Nevertheless, I've messaged and have met women from all three sites. I haven't used POF much yet, but I know there are a lot of hotties on there.
"hello"
"Love to get into your pants lol mmmm!" - (From a 56 year old... yuck!)
"Hi"
"Want to sit on me and ride me as long as you want?" (pass)
"hi miss i think tooooo much sometimes it gives me a headache.lol"
And people wonder why they don't get replied to.
I rarely receive these kinds of messages. Definitely not the 2nd or 4th one. Sometimes I get cut & paste ones but usually I get well thought out ones. It might have something to do with the fact that my account is old-ish, but I'm sure even when I first joined I got mostly good messages (and a lot more of them!).
Of course, OkCupid is one of the easier dating sites to connect with women on. On Match, I feel sometimes that the women are too preppy/stuck-up, especially the hot ones, but I also have to take into consideration that over half the women on Match who posted profiles don't have a paid account and thus can't reply. Same thing with eHarmony. Nevertheless, I've messaged and have met women from all three sites. I haven't used POF much yet, but I know there are a lot of hotties on there.
Check IrishTusk's okc profile, it's pretty good - arrogant but it's definetly working.
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| I just recieved this gem... |
31 Mar 2007, 6:02 pm |
| I recieved my diagnoses yesssss |
09 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm |
| I'm sicken by a response I recieved. |
14 Dec 2007, 2:25 am |
| what's the worst regection line you've ever recieved |
30 Aug 2012, 3:00 pm |
