Look out! It's a Nice Guy! DESTROY HIM!!

Page 26 of 27 [ 394 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 23, 24, 25, 26, 27  Next

Ladywoofwoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Age:33
Posts: 2,637

01 Aug 2013, 12:58 pm

MjrMajorMajor wrote:
Greb wrote:
What matters is that there's a whole generation of women, in which many of them are in the edge of sociopathy.


And more insults against a large general group of women. :roll:

Sometimes you do have some insightful comments, but you seem to need to sandwich them between such vitriol. This obviously is putting a lot of respondents on the defensive and is polarizing this discussion. I don't understand people who thrive on antagonism. :?


But the word "general" means "general" .... and so, if he's insulting a general group of women then uhhhhh.... derpa derp herp derp.

Anyway, more to the point.... why do you have to be so insulting towards this poor fellow ?
Calling him antagonistic and suchlike... so cruel and heartless.
You probably step on kittens just for fun, you evil wench !
:shameonyou:



MjrMajorMajor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jan 2012
Posts: 7,996

01 Aug 2013, 1:01 pm

Ladywoofwoof wrote:
MjrMajorMajor wrote:
Greb wrote:
What matters is that there's a whole generation of women, in which many of them are in the edge of sociopathy.


And more insults against a large general group of women. :roll:

Sometimes you do have some insightful comments, but you seem to need to sandwich them between such vitriol. This obviously is putting a lot of respondents on the defensive and is polarizing this discussion. I don't understand people who thrive on antagonism. :?


But the word "general" means "general" .... and so, if he's insulting a general group of women then uhhhhh.... derpa derp herp derp.

Anyway, more to the point.... why do you have to be so insulting towards this poor fellow ?
Calling him antagonistic and suchlike... so cruel and heartless.
You probably step on kittens just for fun, you evil wench !
:shameonyou:


Nah, just chop them up and boil them into stew...
:twisted:



Mindslave
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2010
Age:27
Posts: 2,052
Location: Where the wild things wish they were

01 Aug 2013, 1:31 pm

MjrMajorMajor wrote:
Ladywoofwoof wrote:
MjrMajorMajor wrote:
Greb wrote:
What matters is that there's a whole generation of women, in which many of them are in the edge of sociopathy.


And more insults against a large general group of women. :roll:

Sometimes you do have some insightful comments, but you seem to need to sandwich them between such vitriol. This obviously is putting a lot of respondents on the defensive and is polarizing this discussion. I don't understand people who thrive on antagonism. :?


But the word "general" means "general" .... and so, if he's insulting a general group of women then uhhhhh.... derpa derp herp derp.

Anyway, more to the point.... why do you have to be so insulting towards this poor fellow ?
Calling him antagonistic and suchlike... so cruel and heartless.
You probably step on kittens just for fun, you evil wench !
:shameonyou:


Nah, just chop them up and boil them into stew...
:twisted:


Here's a good cat recipe: http://catrecipes.com/recipes/braisedcat.html



Ladywoofwoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Age:33
Posts: 2,637

01 Aug 2013, 1:51 pm

:-) A good suggestion, although for optimal cat content I would recommend this one :

http://www.buzzfeed.com/ayano/cat-stew-for-those-cold-winter-days-9bp0

Image



cubedemon6073
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2008
Age:36
Posts: 3,347

01 Aug 2013, 4:23 pm

Quote:
Well, I think the main problem here is that you're taking for granted something that one of the video's points is precissaly to debate: that nice guys think that they're entitled to have a relationship.


Grep, I don't logically follow. How did I take this for granted? I agree with that part of the video and like the video I debate it and don't agree that the nice guys truthfully feel entitled like a lot of feminists claim.



Greb
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 May 2012
Age:43
Posts: 1,397
Location: Under the sea [level]

01 Aug 2013, 8:58 pm

cubedemon6073 wrote:
Quote:
Well, I think the main problem here is that you're taking for granted something that one of the video's points is precissaly to debate: that nice guys think that they're entitled to have a relationship.


Grep, I don't logically follow. How did I take this for granted? I agree with that part of the video and like the video I debate it and don't agree that the nice guys truthfully feel entitled like a lot of feminists claim.


I'm sorry. I interpreted ' In both cases, the person inadvertently thinks that just because something is required for x it automatically means it is sufficient or guaranteed to obtain x. ' as a nice guy, as having something that is required (to treat a parter or a potential partner well), is automatically guaranteed (or entitled ) to obtain this partner. What does it mean then?


_________________
1 part of Asperger | 1 part of OCD | 2 parts of ADHD / APD / GT-LD / 2e
And finally, another part of secret spices :^)


Kezzstar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Age:26
Posts: 1,487
Location: Australia

02 Aug 2013, 1:07 am

Ladywoofwoof wrote:
:-) A good suggestion, although for optimal cat content I would recommend this one :

http://www.buzzfeed.com/ayano/cat-stew-for-those-cold-winter-days-9bp0

Image


I wouldn't eat the calico, according to Japanese folklore they attract money. Not sure what mine does yet...


_________________
"It isn't wrong, but we just don't do it."
Gordon, "Thomas the Tank Engine and Friends: Whistles and Sneezes"
http://www.normalautistic.blogspot.com.au - please read and leave a comment!


cubedemon6073
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2008
Age:36
Posts: 3,347

02 Aug 2013, 7:31 am

Greb wrote:
cubedemon6073 wrote:
Quote:
Well, I think the main problem here is that you're taking for granted something that one of the video's points is precissaly to debate: that nice guys think that they're entitled to have a relationship.


Grep, I don't logically follow. How did I take this for granted? I agree with that part of the video and like the video I debate it and don't agree that the nice guys truthfully feel entitled like a lot of feminists claim.


I'm sorry. I interpreted ' In both cases, the person inadvertently thinks that just because something is required for x it automatically means it is sufficient or guaranteed to obtain x. ' as a nice guy, as having something that is required (to treat a parter or a potential partner well), is automatically guaranteed (or entitled ) to obtain this partner. What does it mean then?


I will have to clarify further. In order for a guy to date a woman or vice versa sufficient conditions have to be met. It can't be just necessary. Data and going into relationships have a further restriction. One is not allowed to attempt to actively meet his or her sufficient conditions. In other words, one can't just try to arbitrarily try to change himself and be fake to go out on a date with her. One already has to meet the conditions or already have the desired criteria that the other person wants.

For example, let's say the person you want to date loves programming. One can't just all of a sudden love programming and try to become a programmer because they do. Nothing says that one can't work on his personality traits outside of a relationship or develop hobbies he actually does love. One has to choose the hobbies he loves, pick out his values, personality traits outside of a relationship. To try to meet her sufficient conditions like some nice guys try to do will not work. IMHO, seeking a relationship should not be actively sought out. Let's say someone loves to collect coins. If one wants to join a coin collecting club to make friends and share common interests then do it. You may inadvertently find someone you are compatible with.

If you love the beach then go to the beach. If you love programming then join a club or go on listserves to share code with other people. If you love fitness a lot then join a fitness club. You may meet someone you're compatible with. If you're not in a relationship, then don't worry about it and don't worry about who has what. Just live your life, start your own business, work on career development, have some fun or whatever.



appletheclown
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2013
Age:22
Posts: 2,495
Location: Soul Society

02 Aug 2013, 4:44 pm

Look! It's a nice guy, let's manipulate him to do stuff for us!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSpuVsLnl1k[/youtube]


_________________
Yabu wo tsutsuite hebi wo dasu. - Nou aru taka wa tsume wo kakusu. - Watashi wa Apple The Clown desu. - Hakubutsukan made dou yatte iki masu ka? - Shrimasen. - Komban wa. - Ohaiyou godzimasu.


Greb
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 May 2012
Age:43
Posts: 1,397
Location: Under the sea [level]

02 Aug 2013, 5:06 pm

cubedemon6073 wrote:
Greb wrote:
cubedemon6073 wrote:
Quote:
Well, I think the main problem here is that you're taking for granted something that one of the video's points is precissaly to debate: that nice guys think that they're entitled to have a relationship.


Grep, I don't logically follow. How did I take this for granted? I agree with that part of the video and like the video I debate it and don't agree that the nice guys truthfully feel entitled like a lot of feminists claim.


I'm sorry. I interpreted ' In both cases, the person inadvertently thinks that just because something is required for x it automatically means it is sufficient or guaranteed to obtain x. ' as a nice guy, as having something that is required (to treat a parter or a potential partner well), is automatically guaranteed (or entitled ) to obtain this partner. What does it mean then?


I will have to clarify further. In order for a guy to date a woman or vice versa sufficient conditions have to be met. It can't be just necessary. Data and going into relationships have a further restriction. One is not allowed to attempt to actively meet his or her sufficient conditions. In other words, one can't just try to arbitrarily try to change himself and be fake to go out on a date with her. One already has to meet the conditions or already have the desired criteria that the other person wants.

For example, let's say the person you want to date loves programming. One can't just all of a sudden love programming and try to become a programmer because they do. Nothing says that one can't work on his personality traits outside of a relationship or develop hobbies he actually does love. One has to choose the hobbies he loves, pick out his values, personality traits outside of a relationship. To try to meet her sufficient conditions like some nice guys try to do will not work. IMHO, seeking a relationship should not be actively sought out. Let's say someone loves to collect coins. If one wants to join a coin collecting club to make friends and share common interests then do it. You may inadvertently find someone you are compatible with.

If you love the beach then go to the beach. If you love programming then join a club or go on listserves to share code with other people. If you love fitness a lot then join a fitness club. You may meet someone you're compatible with. If you're not in a relationship, then don't worry about it and don't worry about who has what. Just live your life, start your own business, work on career development, have some fun or whatever.


One question: why do you consider that the typical 'nice guy' is changing his behaviour in order to get the girl?


_________________
1 part of Asperger | 1 part of OCD | 2 parts of ADHD / APD / GT-LD / 2e
And finally, another part of secret spices :^)


MR_BOGAN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2008
Age:115
Posts: 3,200
Location: The great trailer park in the sky!

03 Aug 2013, 4:41 pm

Greb after reading oliveoilmums post. I can't deny that you are onto something. :shrug:

http://www.wrongplanet.net/posts236743-start30.html

As a teen she left her maybe nice guy boyfriend for a bad boy who is now on death row. Extreme case, but it does say something alright :?


_________________
Dirty Dancing (1987) - Trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qU8CmMJf8QA


Ladywoofwoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Age:33
Posts: 2,637

03 Aug 2013, 5:08 pm

I find the whole OOM saga bewildering, and difficult to understand.... so, do I have this straight now ?

So, she broke up with this first guy (a boyfriend) -

OOM wrote:
When I met the ex I was about 17 and just broke up with my first ever bf who I had been with since I was 15. Great guy, but very sedate and not all that exciting.


... because he was sedate and not all that exciting.... ;-) oh noez !

... in order to get married to a guy who beat the crap out of her, sounds like a douche, and is now a convicted murderer on death row..... and they were married for two years (he seemingly abused her the entire time they were married) .. because :
OOM wrote:
because he was cute, he was exciting, he was interesting, and he was one hell of a bad boy. Which is exactly what I wanted at the time.


... then she left him, for another guy who would be beating the sh*t out of her if it weren't for the fact that she fights better (well enough to wind up in jail a few times because of it) , and he is also a douche..... and they both seem to feel quite at liberty to go shagging other people if they feel like it.... but she reckons that :
OOM wrote:
We have had a good marriage overall and I know he loves me and I love him. [...] Other than some problems he's gone though, he's a good guy.


... and in the meantime, lots of perfectly nice guys are having difficulty getting into a relationship at all....

I just don't even ..... I mean, what the actual.... my head can't even begin to process.....
8O I think I need to go and duct-tape my brain.... it can't take this quantity of dafuq without breaking.



Greb
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 May 2012
Age:43
Posts: 1,397
Location: Under the sea [level]

03 Aug 2013, 8:21 pm

MR_BOGAN wrote:
Greb after reading oliveoilmums post. I can't deny that you are onto something. :shrug:

http://www.wrongplanet.net/posts236743-start30.html

As a teen she left her maybe nice guy boyfriend for a bad boy who is now on death row. Extreme case, but it does say something alright :?


And OliveOilMom is quite a sensible person (probably she learnt the hard way).

Indeed, this 'women and badasses' stuff is just biological. If we were living in the prehistory those nice guys wouldn't be such good providers. The problem is the denial. It's like women being attracted by guys with money: this is just biologial stuff. Women attracted to guys with resources were more likely to see their offspring survive. And the species is shaped by those who survive. But you'll barely see a woman admit it. It's like modern women have built a theory about them and when they find their biology says otherwise, they can't accept it. And then they enter in denial. Indeed, the main point in the video was that nice guys are those who offer women all that they have been asking for (respect, to listen, to treat well, to share homework, and so), and however they don't feel attracted by them. So there's a contradiction between what women feel and what women say. What can you do? Deny and blame nice guys: you don't like them not because your biology says otherwise, but because they feel entitled to have sex, they're assholes, under their kind appearance they're really negligible and miserable.

This is how mind works. And so here we are.


_________________
1 part of Asperger | 1 part of OCD | 2 parts of ADHD / APD / GT-LD / 2e
And finally, another part of secret spices :^)


cubedemon6073
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2008
Age:36
Posts: 3,347

03 Aug 2013, 9:30 pm

Greb wrote:
cubedemon6073 wrote:
Greb wrote:
cubedemon6073 wrote:
Quote:
Well, I think the main problem here is that you're taking for granted something that one of the video's points is precissaly to debate: that nice guys think that they're entitled to have a relationship.


Grep, I don't logically follow. How did I take this for granted? I agree with that part of the video and like the video I debate it and don't agree that the nice guys truthfully feel entitled like a lot of feminists claim.


I'm sorry. I interpreted ' In both cases, the person inadvertently thinks that just because something is required for x it automatically means it is sufficient or guaranteed to obtain x. ' as a nice guy, as having something that is required (to treat a parter or a potential partner well), is automatically guaranteed (or entitled ) to obtain this partner. What does it mean then?


I will have to clarify further. In order for a guy to date a woman or vice versa sufficient conditions have to be met. It can't be just necessary. Data and going into relationships have a further restriction. One is not allowed to attempt to actively meet his or her sufficient conditions. In other words, one can't just try to arbitrarily try to change himself and be fake to go out on a date with her. One already has to meet the conditions or already have the desired criteria that the other person wants.

For example, let's say the person you want to date loves programming. One can't just all of a sudden love programming and try to become a programmer because they do. Nothing says that one can't work on his personality traits outside of a relationship or develop hobbies he actually does love. One has to choose the hobbies he loves, pick out his values, personality traits outside of a relationship. To try to meet her sufficient conditions like some nice guys try to do will not work. IMHO, seeking a relationship should not be actively sought out. Let's say someone loves to collect coins. If one wants to join a coin collecting club to make friends and share common interests then do it. You may inadvertently find someone you are compatible with.

If you love the beach then go to the beach. If you love programming then join a club or go on listserves to share code with other people. If you love fitness a lot then join a fitness club. You may meet someone you're compatible with. If you're not in a relationship, then don't worry about it and don't worry about who has what. Just live your life, start your own business, work on career development, have some fun or whatever.


One question: why do you consider that the typical 'nice guy' is changing his behaviour in order to get the girl?


I've seen it happen in real life. This is where "Be Yourself" comes from. It isn't behavior as so much as pretending to like something or care about something when you don't and vice versa.



MjrMajorMajor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jan 2012
Posts: 7,996

03 Aug 2013, 9:52 pm

Greb wrote:
Indeed, the main point in the video was that nice guys are those who offer women all that they have been asking for (respect, to listen, to treat well, to share homework, and so), and however they don't feel attracted by them. So there's a contradiction between what women feel and what women say.


More blanket statements. Women may not feel attracted to some nice guys. I'm guessing the multitude of happily married nice gentlemen aren't going to be hanging around here to refute your point. :wink: