ccflowergirl wrote:
makuranososhi wrote:
Um, no. It's "less desiring of love", not less deserving.
It can be read as having less of a need for that component in one's life, or a lower priority. Not that someone is seeking sex. Men being asshats, unfortunately, isn't going to change - and that sounds like some of the messages you were receiving. But I think you're way off-base with this whole response. The questions at the bottom are representative of those you have answered, and marked that the responses of others were important to you. Those change with almost every page load.
LB, I think you're doing fine. As you've seen with mine, there are a lot of random 'awards' based on the questions - and if someone is using that as an absolute definition of you... then you probably didn't want to talk to them in the first place.
M.
so what does this mean?? this is there definition-
"Less Desiring of Love
To sum up this category, we will quote liberally from one of the country's great scribes, rapper 50 Cent: "
I'm into having sex, I ain't into making love. So come give me a hug, if you into to getting rubbed." -- poetry. Pure poetry. "
sorry i miss spelled
lol I got that award, as in the questions I valued intelect and the arts over love.
Also all the similar women at the bottom right are all more attentive.
I actually think its a good thing as it makes me
not look like a needy stalker, which is something I think men are worried about when they write to a woman.
I am quite emotionally deficient and independent so I think less desiring of love is quite acurate.
I want a life partner to share time and conversation and sex with.
I dont want someone needy smothering me with "love" and demands- I get enough of that from me kids lol lol
02 Oct 2008, 2:39 pm
