test
Page 1 of 2 [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Susie123
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2009
Age:54
Posts: 73

14 Dec 2009, 10:54 am

Has anyone here had the experience of being turned down for life insurance due to AS? I just had an underwriter say it's an industry-wide policy to not insure people with AS due to mortality rates -- not FROM the AS but as a result of the thinking.



Rainbow-Squirrel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Age:35
Posts: 2,437
Location: Siena, Italy

14 Dec 2009, 11:06 am

Do you mean suicide rates ?



FaithHopeCheese
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 2009
Age:34
Posts: 534
Location: I think I'm lost

14 Dec 2009, 11:28 am

I'm going to look into this. This is my field. 8O


_________________
Get me out of here!


zer0netgain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2009
Age:47
Posts: 6,651

14 Dec 2009, 11:29 am

Wow.

No, but I'm not formally Dx with AS. I know there is a fairly universal 24 month exclusion for suicides on new policies, but if they see you have a persistent risk, I can understand their not wanting to insure you.



FaithHopeCheese
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 2009
Age:34
Posts: 534
Location: I think I'm lost

14 Dec 2009, 12:09 pm

I just checked the underwriting guidelines and it isn't specifically listed as a reason for denial. Did you complete a mental health questionnaire? I just had to fill one out myself to replace life insurance and you have to be very careful....

Basically anything that they consider risky behavior- felonies, DWI, suicidal thinking, etc. will get you denied coverage. (If you fly a private plane, there is a questionnaire for that as well, so it isn't really that they are discriminatory.) Maybe reapply somewhere else and try to answer the questions a little *differently*? I'll keep looking but I haven't been able to find anything specifically listing AS...I would ask the underwriter I work with but I don't want her to get suspicious... :? Learn something new every day I guess. I'm sorry you were declined. :(


_________________
Get me out of here!


RampionRampage
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2008
Age:31
Posts: 746
Location: Greater Philly Area, PA

14 Dec 2009, 1:52 pm

Rainbow-Squirrel wrote:
Do you mean suicide rates ?


That kind of makes sense until you consider that life insurance doesn't pay out for suicides.

Not covering people with AS doesn't make much sense, if suicide is then the issue.

I wonder if they maybe think of us as being more accident prone?


_________________
As of 2-06-08 --- Axis I: Asperger's Disorder | Axis III: Hearing Impaired
My store: http://www.etsy.com/rampionrampage


visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age:48
Posts: 6,085
Location: Vancouver, BC

14 Dec 2009, 2:04 pm

Insurance is a very tricky area, because there is an enormous amount of public policy constraint on the insurance industry, and that varies widely from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

In a Canadian context, I would be astonished to see AS, in and of itself, as a basis upon which to deny coverage. There would have to be some demonstration of an actuarial link between the diagnosis and early mortality which could not reasonably be absorbed into the premium structure.

Given that the earliest diagnoses of AS were less than 30 years ago, and given that these were primarily among children, I find it difficult to see how there would be a body of data sufficient to demonstrate an actuarial conclusion regarding mortality risk of AS.


_________________
--James


FaithHopeCheese
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 2009
Age:34
Posts: 534
Location: I think I'm lost

14 Dec 2009, 3:19 pm

Like zer0netgain mentioned, an insurance company will pay out for a suicide as long as the policy has been in force for 2 years. Now, if you have a suicide attempt on your medical record prior to purchasing the policy then they may deny you, or exclude suicide altogether... So like I said, be careful when filling out those mental health questionnaires, and buy early folks!! 8O


_________________
Get me out of here!


Susie123
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2009
Age:54
Posts: 73

14 Dec 2009, 5:53 pm

Rainbow-Squirrel wrote:
Do you mean suicide rates ?


They didn't say suicide -- I'm not sure if it's that (which I had never heard was higher than the general population) or from not being able to see risk because it doesn't seem logical in certain situations.



Susie123
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2009
Age:54
Posts: 73

14 Dec 2009, 5:57 pm

FaithHopeCheese wrote:
I just checked the underwriting guidelines and it isn't specifically listed as a reason for denial. Did you complete a mental health questionnaire? I just had to fill one out myself to replace life insurance and you have to be very careful....

Basically anything that they consider risky behavior- felonies, DWI, suicidal thinking, etc. will get you denied coverage. (If you fly a private plane, there is a questionnaire for that as well, so it isn't really that they are discriminatory.) Maybe reapply somewhere else and try to answer the questions a little *differently*? I'll keep looking but I haven't been able to find anything specifically listing AS...I would ask the underwriter I work with but I don't want her to get suspicious... :? Learn something new every day I guess. I'm sorry you were declined. :(


We didn't even apply. I was asked what diagnoses he has and said AS. I was informed then that they won't offer a policy to anyone with autism and that it was an industry-wide underwriting standard. We have a policy, but we pay increased rates for the AS dx.

Oddly, this outfit offers policies to servicemen/women going off to war. Appearently, that's less risky, so I want to know why.



Susie123
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2009
Age:54
Posts: 73

14 Dec 2009, 5:59 pm

visagrunt wrote:
Insurance is a very tricky area, because there is an enormous amount of public policy constraint on the insurance industry, and that varies widely from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

In a Canadian context, I would be astonished to see AS, in and of itself, as a basis upon which to deny coverage. There would have to be some demonstration of an actuarial link between the diagnosis and early mortality which could not reasonably be absorbed into the premium structure.

Given that the earliest diagnoses of AS were less than 30 years ago, and given that these were primarily among children, I find it difficult to see how there would be a body of data sufficient to demonstrate an actuarial conclusion regarding mortality risk of AS.


I agree, and I can't find any research supporting a link.



FaithHopeCheese
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 2009
Age:34
Posts: 534
Location: I think I'm lost

14 Dec 2009, 6:11 pm

I'm going to ask somebody. I'll try to find out for you.

edit: I just called th 'big company that's been in the news all year' but the underwriters are gone for the day. The guy that I spoke with said that he didn't see it listed in the guidelines one way or another. You should probably ask the insurance rep that you spoke with to give you further details. I can't find anything that pertains to this on google, except as it relates to kids, and that site was from the UK... :?


_________________
Get me out of here!


Susie123
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2009
Age:54
Posts: 73

14 Dec 2009, 6:55 pm

FaithHopeCheese wrote:
I'm going to ask somebody. I'll try to find out for you.

edit: I just called th 'big company that's been in the news all year' but the underwriters are gone for the day. The guy that I spoke with said that he didn't see it listed in the guidelines one way or another. You should probably ask the insurance rep that you spoke with to give you further details. I can't find anything that pertains to this on google, except as it relates to kids, and that site was from the UK... :?


Interesting. The whole thing doesn't make sense to me.



RampionRampage
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2008
Age:31
Posts: 746
Location: Greater Philly Area, PA

14 Dec 2009, 10:05 pm

Susie123 wrote:
FaithHopeCheese wrote:
I'm going to ask somebody. I'll try to find out for you.

edit: I just called th 'big company that's been in the news all year' but the underwriters are gone for the day. The guy that I spoke with said that he didn't see it listed in the guidelines one way or another. You should probably ask the insurance rep that you spoke with to give you further details. I can't find anything that pertains to this on google, except as it relates to kids, and that site was from the UK... :?


Interesting. The whole thing doesn't make sense to me.


Maybe the person you spoke with didn't want you going to other companies. Or was full of it. Or whatever.
People say whatever they want about AS/Autism these days, and there doesn't seem to be enough correction for the nonsense that gets put out.


_________________
As of 2-06-08 --- Axis I: Asperger's Disorder | Axis III: Hearing Impaired
My store: http://www.etsy.com/rampionrampage


FaithHopeCheese
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 2009
Age:34
Posts: 534
Location: I think I'm lost

15 Dec 2009, 10:19 am

I sent an email to another contact last night and this was her response:

"If over 18, educated and integrated into society (i.e., employed or furthering education), they are insurable. Under age 18, usually decline."

I hope that helps.