test
Page 2 of 2 [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age:42
Posts: 5,532
Location: Alberta Canada

30 Dec 2009, 2:34 am

Zeno, Midori web browser is very simple. Maybe have a look at that.


_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.


Tach
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2009
Age:25
Posts: 191
Location: Sol System

30 Dec 2009, 5:31 am

I use the latest chrome. I love the extensions they now have on it for one (I'm using flashblock and adblock for starters, along with the RSS feed.) Overall, unless I need to use IE, I avoid IE at all costs.


_________________
I got a C++ in programming...


Zeno
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age:42
Posts: 690
Location: Singapore

30 Dec 2009, 8:40 am

sinsboldly wrote:
pakled wrote:
yup, telnet is capable (if a bit primitive), but most Linux training I've seen recommends disabling it soonest...;)


oh, gawd, Telnet. I cut my Internet teeth on Telnet chatters. I used to mod back in the wild and woolly when a woman (read actual) woman on the Internet was catnip to the overwhelming majority of men and boys on Telnet. Lintilla a BBS from Sweden had chat rooms in English. I got my job at Gateway 2000 in North Sioux City, South Dakota USA from that BBS. Got there just in time to support the Pentium with Windows 95.

those were the days . . . :D

Merle


pakled wrote:
True...I actually used Telnet to log into mainframe printers to test Internet settings. I can't remember the name of the first program I usedl (probably Procomm), but it came on a 5/25" floppy...;)


Before instant messaging, there was chat. I feel nostalgic for the days when one actually had to be a dedicated technology geek to know of and use software like chat. I started surfing the internet in the early 1990s when it was essentially an academic affair. If it had not been for the disruptions in my life during that period of time (I dropped out of medical school and had to return to the Singapore army to finish up a mandatory 2 year service), it would have been likely that I would have gone the full distance and specialized in information technology. Now I am glad that I did not do that. It was unlikely that I would have attained any dot com wealth and far more likely that I would have just joined the legions of analysts, coders and administrators that kept the IT fire burning. These days there are a lot of embittered and angry IT professionals who find that age discrimination in the industry is rampant. Why hire someone in their 40s or 50s who may know a lot about legacy systems when you can hire a twenty something from India who is not only cheaper but also not burdened by the past?

In hindsight, all the innovations that forced people to relearn and retrain actually did very little to improve our lives or help raise productivity. Wrongplanet.net for instance could run just as well as a BBS hosted on an academic server. It would be a world of text that is shorn of fancy graphics and absolutely no video, but the word is truer and in many ways a better representation of the human spirit.



Fogman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Age:48
Posts: 3,816
Location: Carolina de Sur

30 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm

I agree with most of the above posters. I have not used IE8, and only use IE7 on the very rare occaisions that I absolutley have to. I use Firefox, Opera, and sometimes Safari.


_________________
When There's No There to get to, I'm so There!


pakled
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Age:57
Posts: 7,827

30 Dec 2009, 11:09 pm

To be honest, I can't think of an Internet Explorer they didn't mess up...;)
IE, the 'red shirts' of the Star Trek Internet world...;)


_________________
anahl nathrak, uth vas bethude, doth yel dyenvey...


Zeno
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age:42
Posts: 690
Location: Singapore

25 Jan 2010, 10:47 am

So Microsoft did screw up IE8. It was IE8 that was named the vulnerability in the Google hacks and then an urgent update followed. I have a feeling that the assaults began long before Google made public their 'concerns'. How does a company spend so much money developing a product and still get it wrong? :lol:



pakled
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Age:57
Posts: 7,827

25 Jan 2010, 11:15 am

actually, I started out with a 1200-baud internal modem, connecting to BBS's, and the aforementioned Procomm (later Netscape, then IE...only because it was at work, and it was all they had). Firefox been berry berry good to me so far...;)

And my new job even lets me use it at work...;) shweet...;)


_________________
anahl nathrak, uth vas bethude, doth yel dyenvey...


greengeek
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Age:24
Posts: 446
Location: New York USA

25 Jan 2010, 7:03 pm

The stripped too many buttons off the main window in IE7 and 8. IE6 was so much easier to use as it had a lot buttons for stuff like printing and you did not have to go into menus to do a lot of things.


_________________
Nothing is fool proof only fool resistant


Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age:42
Posts: 5,532
Location: Alberta Canada

25 Jan 2010, 8:21 pm

Even their ads are s**t. They have nothing practical to use as a sale pitch, so they result to histrionics.

Warning. Dont watch if you dont have a strong gag reflex.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xB9fhjnJcB0[/youtube]


_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.


RaceDrv709
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2007
Age:24
Posts: 1,104
Location: San Antonio, Texas

25 Jan 2010, 10:43 pm

After using Chrome, Opera and and Firefox, I have never gone back to Internet Explorer!


_________________
Music is my gateway to freedom. My instrument of choice is the trumpet.
http://www.youtube.com/NightHawk877