test
Page 1 of 1 [ 13 posts ] 

PatrickNeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2010
Age:24
Posts: 1,136
Location: Scotland

28 Feb 2011, 11:44 am

Technically unlikely occurrence but it seems that it space the unlikely is almost always happening somewhere :)

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2 ... orbit.html

Use link for access to external links contained within article:

Quote:
Buried in the flood of data from the Kepler telescope is a planetary system unlike any seen before. Two of its apparent planets share the same orbit around their star. If the discovery is confirmed, it would bolster a theory that Earth once shared its orbit with a Mars-sized body that later crashed into it, resulting in the moon's formation.

The two planets are part of a four-planet system dubbed KOI-730. They circle their sun-like parent star every 9.8 days at exactly the same orbital distance, one permanently about 60 degrees ahead of the other. In the night sky of one planet, the other world must appear as a constant, blazing light, never fading or brightening.

Gravitational "sweet spots" make this possible. When one body (such as a planet) orbits a much more massive body (a star), there are two Lagrange points along the planet's orbit where a third body can orbit stably. These lie 60 degrees ahead of and 60 degrees behind the smaller object. For example, groups of asteroids called Trojans lie at these points along Jupiter's orbit.

In theory, matter in a disc of material around a newborn star could coalesce into so-called "co-orbiting" planets, but no one had spotted evidence of this before. "Systems like this are not common, as this is the only one we have seen," says Jack Lissauer of NASA's Ames Research Center in Mountain View, California. Lissauer and colleagues describe the KOI-730 system in a paper submitted to the Astrophysical Journal (arxiv.org/abs/1102.0543).

Richard Gott and Edward Belbruno at Princeton University say we may even have evidence of the phenomenon in our own cosmic backyard. The moon is thought to have formed about 50 million years after the birth of the solar system, from the debris of a collision between a Mars-sized body and Earth. Simulations suggest the impactor, dubbed Theia, must have come in at a low speed. According to Gott and Belbruno, this could only have happened if Theia had originated in a leading or trailing Lagrange point along Earth's orbit. The new finds "show the kind of thing we imagined can happen", Gott says.

Will KOI-730's co-orbiting planets collide to form a moon someday? "That would be spectacular," says Gott. That may be so, but simulations by Bob Vanderbei at Princeton suggest the planets will continue to orbit in lockstep with each other for the next 2.22 million years at least.


_________________
<Insert meaningful signature here> ;)


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Posts: 41,825
Location: the island of defective toy santas

01 Mar 2011, 1:45 am

fascinating. what caused one of the planets to cruise into another?



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age:27
Posts: 12,327
Location: Montréal

01 Mar 2011, 1:52 am

That's really interesting. They have made so many discoveries just in the past year. I mean a month ago they announced more then 1500 potentials including around 50 in their star's habitable zones. That increased our knowledge of the planets out there from ~500 to ~2000 give or take a few hundred that may have been errors. Up until just 18 years ago we only knew about 8 planets. This is probably the most exciting time for astronomy in all of history


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Posts: 41,825
Location: the island of defective toy santas

01 Mar 2011, 2:41 am

the terrestrial planet finder [series of interferometry-linked outer space telescopes with enough collective resolving ability to spot earth-sized planets hundreds of light years distant] would be the best thing since hubble. the pluto express would come in second.



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age:27
Posts: 12,327
Location: Montréal

01 Mar 2011, 3:01 am

Image
This is HR 8799, 129 l.y. away (the star: big blob in the middle-right) orbited by four giant gas planets (fourth is behind the star)
I can't wait to see the future resolution of extrasolar systems. That picture is primitive but still somewhat impressive. Eventually we'll probably be able to directly image the planets and see if they have oceans or patterns cohesive to biological growth. Maybe in the next ten years... :D
I read a conservative estimate that the Milky Way alone has at least 50,000,000,000 planets


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Posts: 41,825
Location: the island of defective toy santas

01 Mar 2011, 3:27 am

Vigilans wrote:
Image
This is HR 8799, 129 l.y. away (the star: big blob in the middle-right) orbited by four giant gas planets (fourth is behind the star)
I can't wait to see the future resolution of extrasolar systems. That picture is primitive but still somewhat impressive. Eventually we'll probably be able to directly image the planets and see if they have oceans or patterns cohesive to biological growth. Maybe in the next ten years... :D

what 'scope imaged that one?

Vigilans wrote:
I read a conservative estimate that the Milky Way alone has at least 50,000,000,000 planets


i wonder how many have at least a level 0 civilization?



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age:27
Posts: 12,327
Location: Montréal

01 Mar 2011, 7:40 pm

I'm pretty sure it was a combination of the Keck and Gemini Telescopes, which are on top of a mountain in Hawaii, if I'm not mistaken. The picture used quite a bit of image enhancement in the infrared spectrum to capture that. One thing I find so impressive about it is that we are actually looking at an entire solar system, we may never be able to look at our own system in this fashion. All of those giant planets orbit much further out comparatively than Neptune orbits our sun, which made it easier to spot them.. I read the analogy that directly imaging an extrasolar world is like trying to spot a candle next to a spotlight from a hundred miles away. There is some debate that the planets shown there might be brown dwarfs, if they have enough mass

Quote:
i wonder how many have at least a level 0 civilization?


I think there are many. I saw this one video that demonstrated how civilizations might 'flicker' on and off throughout the galaxy over time. If I remember the web page I'll share it with you, I thought it was really cool


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Posts: 41,825
Location: the island of defective toy santas

02 Mar 2011, 12:36 am

Vigilans wrote:
Quote:
i wonder how many have at least a level 0 civilization?


I think there are many. I saw this one video that demonstrated how civilizations might 'flicker' on and off throughout the galaxy over time. If I remember the web page I'll share it with you, I thought it was really cool


i wonder if anybody as done some kind of graph or chart showing projections/conjectures of the likely proportions of level 0/1/2 civilizations distributed throughout the galaxy, like a cosmic bell-curve. i would guess that level 3 civilizations would be countable on the digits of one hand, and don't even need a galaxy to live in- lord knows just how they would be living in the first place.



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age:25
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

02 Mar 2011, 10:04 am

Vigilans wrote:
Image
This is HR 8799, 129 l.y. away (the star: big blob in the middle-right) orbited by four giant gas planets (fourth is behind the star)
I can't wait to see the future resolution of extrasolar systems. That picture is primitive but still somewhat impressive. Eventually we'll probably be able to directly image the planets and see if they have oceans or patterns cohesive to biological growth. Maybe in the next ten years... :D
I read a conservative estimate that the Milky Way alone has at least 50,000,000,000 planets


mesmerizing picture, im amazed at the quality, cant wait for the future, darn the lack of comfy cryogenics.


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


PatrickNeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2010
Age:24
Posts: 1,136
Location: Scotland

02 Mar 2011, 6:55 pm

If you guys are speaking of the same sort of system as i think you might be, i guess that you mean a type one civilisation means a moneyless one yes?

In that case what are the requirements for a type 0 and type 2?


_________________
<Insert meaningful signature here> ;)


Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age:27
Posts: 12,327
Location: Montréal

02 Mar 2011, 11:49 pm

PatrickNeville wrote:
If you guys are speaking of the same sort of system as i think you might be, i guess that you mean a type one civilisation means a moneyless one yes?

In that case what are the requirements for a type 0 and type 2?


Kardashev Scale of Development (<- Link)


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


PatrickNeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2010
Age:24
Posts: 1,136
Location: Scotland

03 Mar 2011, 7:26 am

Vigilans wrote:
PatrickNeville wrote:
If you guys are speaking of the same sort of system as i think you might be, i guess that you mean a type one civilisation means a moneyless one yes?

In that case what are the requirements for a type 0 and type 2?


Kardashev Scale of Development (<- Link)


You will love this series of predictions. Of course like the one you showed me, it is highly speculative but also involves a ton of science for late on predictions and goes into lots of detail.

Enjoy:
http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/4gg01N/ww ... eline.net/


_________________
<Insert meaningful signature here> ;)


pakled
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Age:57
Posts: 7,827

03 Mar 2011, 11:40 pm

Thank heavens, for a moment, I thought the Gor books could be true...;)

I would suppose it could be possible, if so, it's interesting.


_________________
anahl nathrak, uth vas bethude, doth yel dyenvey...