What package would he/she come in?
RainingRoses wrote:
emuman100 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
My ideal packages are real-life past crushes, I never had a crush on a celeb.
Same here. Mine are real life current crushes and past.
Honestly, if we're talking about genuine crushes, then mine are too. Real people with all of their wonderful flaws and quirks and imperfections -- mental and physical. But, it's kinda fun to put that aside for a moment and just explore form completely devoid of content. Would would the ideal "vehicle" be?
Really? None of these people who have clearly won the genetic lottery do it for you???
"won the genetic lottery"?
for me, the only people who won the genetic lottery are the people who have the whole package of attractiveness, and i can't tell that unless i get to know them personally. those celebs may be douchebags or high maintenace or whatever. they don't look good to me unless they are fleshed out with more important things.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt237032.html
emuman100 wrote:
These celebrities, even though they are almost always slim, are shown as "perfect" looking very plastic with makeup and airbrushing, etc which isn't real. I rather see someone look natural, as they are, with all their "flaws and imperfections".
True, but as someone pointed out, if we posted pics of our real crushes, it would violate their privacy. In the celeb world, there's no such thing as privacy any more. Their faces are public property, poor things.
HopeGrows
Veteran
Joined: 5 Nov 2009
Age:41
Posts: 1,565
Location: In exactly the right place at exactly the right time.
keira wrote:
Gerard Butler
[img][img]http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/8157/55780083a12002bta7hv.th.jpg[/img] Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/img]
[img][img]http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/8157/55780083a12002bta7hv.th.jpg[/img] Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/img]
Yes! That man makes me proud to be a Scot!
_________________
What you feel is what you are and what you are is beautiful...
hyperlexian wrote:
"won the genetic lottery"?
for me, the only people who won the genetic lottery are the people who have the whole package of attractiveness, and i can't tell that unless i get to know them personally. those celebs may be douchebags or high maintenace or whatever. they don't look good to me unless they are fleshed out with more important things.
for me, the only people who won the genetic lottery are the people who have the whole package of attractiveness, and i can't tell that unless i get to know them personally. those celebs may be douchebags or high maintenace or whatever. they don't look good to me unless they are fleshed out with more important things.
I'm not sure I was saying anything that contradicts your position; but, I admit I wasn't being terribly highbrow about it either(!) I was simply trying to participate in a thread that, for better or worse, doesn't really lend itself to the kind of thorough personal analysis you (or I) would want to do IRL, right? I guess I was treating this as a fun and superficial little game, which may or may not be true to the OP's design.
RainingRoses wrote:
emuman100 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
My ideal packages are real-life past crushes, I never had a crush on a celeb.
Same here. Mine are real life current crushes and past.
Honestly, if we're talking about genuine crushes, then mine are too. Real people with all of their wonderful flaws and quirks and imperfections -- mental and physical. But, it's kinda fun to put that aside for a moment and just explore form completely devoid of content. Would would the ideal "vehicle" be?
Really? None of these people who have clearly won the genetic lottery do it for you???
No, not really. I am very down to earth I guess, even in my fantasies, I don't even see the point to have a fantasy about someone that unreachable.
Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 28 Apr 2011, 2:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RainingRoses wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
"won the genetic lottery"?
for me, the only people who won the genetic lottery are the people who have the whole package of attractiveness, and i can't tell that unless i get to know them personally. those celebs may be douchebags or high maintenace or whatever. they don't look good to me unless they are fleshed out with more important things.
for me, the only people who won the genetic lottery are the people who have the whole package of attractiveness, and i can't tell that unless i get to know them personally. those celebs may be douchebags or high maintenace or whatever. they don't look good to me unless they are fleshed out with more important things.
I'm not sure I was saying anything that contradicts your position; but, I admit I wasn't being terribly highbrow about it either(!) I was simply trying to participate in a thread that, for better or worse, doesn't really lend itself to the kind of thorough personal analysis you (or I) would want to do IRL, right? I guess I was treating this as a fun and superficial little game, which may or may not be true to the OP's design.
yeah, i think i understand. some of us see it differently, is all.
do you watch t.v. or something and think to yourself, "i find so-and-so attractive"? i don't think that way, though i totally understand that other people must do so. i think there's nothing wrong with that.i just think it's interesting to see different perspectives on it.
there are a few actors that i find intriguing, or that i respect a lot, and it can build up into a certain attractiveness in my mind (like Helen Mirren or Alan Rickman), but it has nothing to do with their appearance. so it wouldn't be relevant to this discussion, i think. it's like people become good-looking once i get to know them.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt237032.html
I've never crushed on a celebrity. There are a few that I'm like, "They're nice looking" but that's about it really. I guess real people are more interesting to me. And yes, I mean "real people" as I believe that celebrities are manufactured on an assembly line...like robots. DUN DUN DUUUUUUN!
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Btw, I agree with the term "won the genetic lottery", celebs are people who won it, yes most of them had worked hard too, but without great inborn talents and/or good looks they wouldn't be able to do it. Same can be said about great scientists/politicians/sportmen.
I think a lot of em were just really lucky & had the rite connections.
Erisad wrote:
I've never crushed on a celebrity. There are a few that I'm like, "They're nice looking" but that's about it really. I guess real people are more interesting to me. And yes, I mean "real people" as I believe that celebrities are manufactured on an assembly line...like robots. DUN DUN DUUUUUUN!
I feel the same way about most of em. Miranda's an exception because she is real
_________________
la-la-la
HopeGrows
Veteran
Joined: 5 Nov 2009
Age:41
Posts: 1,565
Location: In exactly the right place at exactly the right time.
hyperlexian wrote:
there are a few actors that i find intriguing, or that i respect a lot, and it can build up into a certain attractiveness in my mind (like Helen Mirren or Alan Rickman)
Alan Rickman in "Truly, Madly, Deeply" and (oddly enough) the Harry Potter movies.
Erisad wrote:
I've never crushed on a celebrity. There are a few that I'm like, "They're nice looking" but that's about it really. I guess real people are more interesting to me. And yes, I mean "real people" as I believe that celebrities are manufactured on an assembly line...like robots. DUN DUN DUUUUUUN!
Famebots.
_________________
What you feel is what you are and what you are is beautiful...
all_white wrote:
emuman100 wrote:
These celebrities, even though they are almost always slim, are shown as "perfect" looking very plastic with makeup and airbrushing, etc which isn't real. I rather see someone look natural, as they are, with all their "flaws and imperfections".
True, but as someone pointed out, if we posted pics of our real crushes, it would violate their privacy. In the celeb world, there's no such thing as privacy any more. Their faces are public property, poor things.
Would it be a violation of their privacy if they made their FB photo public?
emuman100 wrote:
These celebrities, even though they are almost always slim, are shown as "perfect" looking very plastic with makeup and airbrushing, etc which isn't real. I rather see someone look natural, as they are, with all their "flaws and imperfections".
A lot of the men just look a bit fake tbh. Like Ken (as in Barbie and Ken). It's creepy. There probably are famous men I'd find attractive, I'm just not sure how to find them. We need a search engine where you can put in the attributes that you'd like to see and it'll provide you with a suitable person for your viewing requirements.
HopeGrows wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
there are a few actors that i find intriguing, or that i respect a lot, and it can build up into a certain attractiveness in my mind (like Helen Mirren or Alan Rickman)
Alan Rickman in "Truly, Madly, Deeply" and (oddly enough) the Harry Potter movies.
my daughter thinks he is quite grand (and my mother did also). something about his speech, mannerisms, and approach to acting is quite wonderful. i really like his nose a lot.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt237032.html
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Obsessing Over a Package |
16 Apr 2014, 3:38 pm |
| Package from my dad and his wife. |
20 Jul 2011, 5:48 am |
| What is the best anti-virus package out there? |
17 May 2009, 10:30 am |
| Women and the new Economic Package |
19 Feb 2009, 3:57 pm |

