Page 4 of 5 [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


What makes one a Christian?
A Christian is one who professes faith in Christ, irrespective of actions. 27%  27%  [ 10 ]
A Christian is one who professes faith in Christ, irrespective of baptism. 3%  3%  [ 1 ]
A Christian is one who professes faith in Christ, irrespective of actions or baptism. 11%  11%  [ 4 ]
A Christian is one who professes faith in Christ and who acts in accord with that faith, irrespective of baptism.. 30%  30%  [ 11 ]
A Christian is one who has been "baptized into Christ," irrespective of current belief or action. 8%  8%  [ 3 ]
A Christian is still a sinner. 22%  22%  [ 8 ]
A Christian does not sin. 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 37

01001011
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Mar 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 991

24 Jun 2011, 9:38 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
To put in my two cents about Pauline theology differing from what Christ himself had taught; it seems to me that John's Gospel pretty well has Jesus saying very much the same thing as Paul. But while Paul has to go in depth on theological questions, Christ pretty much said the same thing, but in simple, concise language. Also, it should be remembered Paul's letters were written maybe just twenty or thirty years after Christ's time, whereas the Gospels were in fact written down much later, arguably making Paul's theology closer to the time period of the source (namely, Christ).

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


My point is even at that time the followers of Jesus was highly fractured. There was the church at Jerusalem led by James, the Gnostic, and many different Gospels like the Gospel of Thomas. What we have in the modern bible is only part of the story.



Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

24 Jun 2011, 12:45 pm

01001011quote wrote:
A quote from your guru... do you think he even intends us to use his quote as a way to define whether a third party is a Christian or not? Nevermind how subjective this definition is (and you never object). For the purpose of discussion, such quote is irrelevant.

Since nobody can understand who is a 'real Christian'. the term 'real Christian tm' must be considered another piece of NONSENSE GIBBERISH.


Irrelevant for purposes of discussion? So I say "THIS is why I believe X" and you get to say, that is irrelevant, why do you believe X?" Come on.

It is NOT discussion if you start with the assumption that everything I say is irrelevant and gibberish.

I could do the same - I could label everything you say about your beliefs and understandings irrelevant gibberish. Why not? I have found your statements unconvincing - and I have at least THOUGHT about yours.

I have been in "discussions" where everything I said was preset to lies and gibberish.

I initially made the mistake, because you do not rant incoherently, that you were actually interested in discussion, in learning why people hold views you do not agree with and letting them not your reasons.

But you are materialist without being scientist.

I get that now.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,784
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

24 Jun 2011, 1:42 pm

01001011 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
To put in my two cents about Pauline theology differing from what Christ himself had taught; it seems to me that John's Gospel pretty well has Jesus saying very much the same thing as Paul. But while Paul has to go in depth on theological questions, Christ pretty much said the same thing, but in simple, concise language. Also, it should be remembered Paul's letters were written maybe just twenty or thirty years after Christ's time, whereas the Gospels were in fact written down much later, arguably making Paul's theology closer to the time period of the source (namely, Christ).

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


My point is even at that time the followers of Jesus was highly fractured. There was the church at Jerusalem led by James, the Gnostic, and many different Gospels like the Gospel of Thomas. What we have in the modern bible is only part of the story.


That is true that the early church was very fractured. As a Western Civ instructor I had had in my college days had once said - there is more agreement among Christians today, than there was two thousand years ago. To be a Christian back then, all you had to believe was, "Jesus is Lord."

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



chromanebula
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jun 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 55
Location: Atlanta

08 Nov 2017, 11:59 pm

techn0teen wrote:
Catholicism says that God chooses who goes into heaven or not. The goal is to get to heaven by avoiding what the church sees as sinful actions and following the church's teachings. Being a Christian to them means following the church's teachings and avoiding sin.

As a practicing Catholic, I can affirm that you must avoid mortal sin and follow the Church's teachings to go to heaven. But God only chooses who goes to heaven in the sense that He chooses all of us as heaven-bound. That is, God wills all to be saved. Our choice is whether or not to repent, believe in the Gospel, and accept God's mercy.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,784
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

09 Nov 2017, 12:08 am

How many years old is this thread?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 32,886
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

10 Nov 2017, 3:14 am

Old members here seemed to have a lack of history knowledge on early Christianity.

In early "Christianity" there was no clear definition of what's Christianity: the definition of Jesus was a debatable among early believers, some groups of Jews viewed him as a son of man and as a human prophet - not as God ( Nontrianitism, ie. ebionites, Messianic Jews...etc), and some others viewed him as Son of God and as one with God (true trinity), and some had other views in between such as Arianism. And of course there were Jews who refused Jesus altogether and remained Jews. We can say that Jewish Christianity was evolving into different branches of "Christianity".

You should understand that Judaism is a strictly monotheist religion, like Islam, hence why many Jews back in the time couldn't digest the idea, whether fully or partially, of Jesus' divinity, leading to many different views as stated above.

Because of the birth of many different Christian views on the nature of Jesus and his relationship with God - the definition of what's Christian became more confusing and blurred, this led to the First Council of Nicaea in AD 325., which was the first large summit of major churches, which was attended by the heads of which considered today the major Christian churches: Catholics, Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox; and together they issued the Nicene Creed and the 20 Canons of Christianity which defines what makes one a real Christian. Therefore declaring all other sects that don't fit the definition in this decree as heretics; many of these sects were in the Middle East and Arabia.

Islam is a religion that evolved from the other branch of Nontrianitist 'Christianity' with some Arabian pagan elements.



RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,970
Location: Adelaide, Australia

13 Nov 2017, 6:48 pm

I've actually heard Christians say Christians from other denominations or Christians who disagreed with them are about certain issues are Satanists and antichristians. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who thinks they're a Christian, is a Christian.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,784
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

13 Nov 2017, 6:52 pm

RetroGamer87 wrote:
I've actually heard Christians say Christians from other denominations or Christians who disagreed with them are about certain issues are Satanists and antichristians. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who thinks they're a Christian, is a Christian.


:thumleft:


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,970
Location: Adelaide, Australia

13 Nov 2017, 7:17 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Islam is a religion that evolved from the other branch of Nontrianitist 'Christianity' with some Arabian pagan elements.

Really? I thought it evolved from Judaism. Isn't that way the 2nd Surah gives instructions on how to win an argument against all the Jews who didn't convert?


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


DinoMongoosePenguin
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

Joined: 21 Aug 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 176
Location: The NSA Knows

13 Nov 2017, 8:27 pm

Asking Jesus to forgive you of your sins and accepting Him as Lord.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

13 Nov 2017, 8:38 pm

A Christian is a person who believes Jesus of Nazareth, also known as Jesus Christ, is divine in some way. Most believe he is the Son of God.



RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,970
Location: Adelaide, Australia

13 Nov 2017, 9:27 pm

Christians who talk about how righteous they are should read Romans 3:10 and Ecclesiastes 7:20. Also Matthew 6:5 and all of Matthew 23.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 32,886
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

14 Nov 2017, 8:41 am

RetroGamer87 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Islam is a religion that evolved from the other branch of Nontrianitist 'Christianity' with some Arabian pagan elements.

Really? I thought it evolved from Judaism. Isn't that way the 2nd Surah gives instructions on how to win an argument against all the Jews who didn't convert?


The Nontrianitist branch of Christianity (which was declared as "Heretic" by the First Council Nicaea) had retained the old "Jewish" ways.

One major difference between the Nicaea-recognized Christianity (Catholics, Orthodox) and and the old Nontrinitarianist Christianity is their view regarding the old "Jewish ways" - which btw is commonly called in Arabic Al-Sharia el Yahoudiya (the Jewish Sharia). There was no Protestant movement back then, but most Protestant churches today are Trinitarian by definition.

"True" Christians (Nicaea-recognized Christians) have long rejected the old Jewish ways based on certain interpretations of Jesus teachings: a striking example is the story of Jesus saving the life of Mary Magdalene from stoning. This was a "liberation" movement against the old ways. Catholic and Orthodox Christians (which are originally the same) today are Gospel-followers only (new testament) , while Old Testament (Torah) is secondary.
Protestantism is more at the center (it "brought back" some Old Testament ways into their life) . That's why Christians today can eat pork and carnivore animals (have no eating restrictions at all), drink alcohol, ...etc, because they have ditched the Jewish laws long ago.

On the other hand, the old Nontrinitarianist Christian sects in the Middle East (ie. Ebionites and Messianic Jewish) have retained the old Jewish ways; they remained applying the teachings of the Old Testament (Torah) over eons; they remained very Judiasm-like religions; and Islam evolved from those, from the Ebionites sect in particular.

Hence why the striking similarity between Islam and Judaism, they are the most two lookalike religions in the world today in the ways of living and practices. Islam isn't something "New" - it's something based on a very old doctrine that evolved in parallel with the other branch of Christianity (Trinitarian).