test
Page 6 of 8 [ 107 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

Tom_Kakes
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Posts: 342

05 Sep 2011, 3:08 am

Jono wrote:
Tom_Kakes wrote:
DarcVidosa wrote:
Is it not just that the universe is infinite in the way that we only seem to perceive three dimensions, while string theory, although multiple theories exist, tells us that there are more then three dimensions, if that is the case, then maybe three dimensional beings like humans, or at least beings that can only see in three dimensions, can't see an so called "border" around the universe because the universe has more then three dimensions and therefore humans can not step out of the universe because humans can't travel in a fourth or fifth or etc... dimension. This means that we can not see the universe for something other than an infinite three dimensional thing, thus the universe might be finite but we will not be able to see the end. I might be wrong but from what I understand the theories on the "form" of the universe only indicate how dimensions roll up in a certain way.

But I don't know, It's some time ago that I was really in to space so I might have something not remembered right.


M-theory predicts 11 dimensions but they are so small (or thin) we cant interact with them. They are treated in theory as strings (String theory).

I think people mix up these dimensions with alternate realities. Alternate realities or the multiverse stems from when the universe was very young, only a few milliseconds after the big bang, when the universe was small enough for the the concepts of relativity and quantum mechanics to work at the same time (or together). Time also acted as a singularity with space, so there was no time as such.

Now, we know that an electron has an infinite number of possibilities. So the theory is basically that shortly after the big bang when the universe was at the quantum scale the universe had an infinite number of possibilities.

So our existence probably is just one of those possibilities (which must exist too).

Hope that made sense.


Actually, in string theory, the curled up extra dimensions are not themselves treated as strings. Rather, the strings move and vibrate within these extra dimensions to form all the known elementary particles, where each kind particle, for example whether it's an electron or quark, is a different vibration mode of the string. One of these string vibration modes always seems to include a graviton, which is why string theory appears to successfully unite general relativity with quantum mechanics. Sorry if I seem to keep correcting you.


Nah its fine, i was getting at the fact that string theory got its name from the way the strings were first described. The strings emanating from the extra dimensions were described to be very thin, so thin that we cant interact with them but they could be described to each have unique length. Hence "string theory". Of course i don't mean length in the classical sense, rather length measured through time and space.

Now the strings are described in two states, closed (loop) and string. As said the so called "vibration" of the string is said to correspond to the particle it creates in our 4 dimensions.

So i suppose you could look at our 4 dimensional existence as kind of like a shadow on a wall...



Tom_Kakes
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Posts: 342

05 Sep 2011, 3:15 am

ruveyn wrote:
Tom_Kakes wrote:

Image

The blue pixel is earth...



.


Or as Carl Sagan said billyuns and billyuns of times: the pale blue pixel.

ruveyn


Lol

Everyone must have seen that image by now but as the old saying goes "a picture is worth a thousand words"...

If god exists and the universe was created for humans he made way too much black stuff...



Legre
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2011
Age:24
Posts: 24

05 Sep 2011, 5:12 am

VIDEODROME wrote:
I think looking for the end of the Universe is like starting an expedition to look for the end of the Earth.

A being who lives in the water/air surface of the ocean and can only "see" surface waves can not look to the sky and see that he already lives in the border of the Earth.



DarcVidosa
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2011
Posts: 37
Location: Amsterdam

05 Sep 2011, 5:45 am

Tom_Kakes wrote:
Jono wrote:
Tom_Kakes wrote:
DarcVidosa wrote:
Is it not just that the universe is infinite in the way that we only seem to perceive three dimensions, while string theory, although multiple theories exist, tells us that there are more then three dimensions, if that is the case, then maybe three dimensional beings like humans, or at least beings that can only see in three dimensions, can't see an so called "border" around the universe because the universe has more then three dimensions and therefore humans can not step out of the universe because humans can't travel in a fourth or fifth or etc... dimension. This means that we can not see the universe for something other than an infinite three dimensional thing, thus the universe might be finite but we will not be able to see the end. I might be wrong but from what I understand the theories on the "form" of the universe only indicate how dimensions roll up in a certain way.

But I don't know, It's some time ago that I was really in to space so I might have something not remembered right.


M-theory predicts 11 dimensions but they are so small (or thin) we cant interact with them. They are treated in theory as strings (String theory).

I think people mix up these dimensions with alternate realities. Alternate realities or the multiverse stems from when the universe was very young, only a few milliseconds after the big bang, when the universe was small enough for the the concepts of relativity and quantum mechanics to work at the same time (or together). Time also acted as a singularity with space, so there was no time as such.

Now, we know that an electron has an infinite number of possibilities. So the theory is basically that shortly after the big bang when the universe was at the quantum scale the universe had an infinite number of possibilities.

So our existence probably is just one of those possibilities (which must exist too).

Hope that made sense.


Actually, in string theory, the curled up extra dimensions are not themselves treated as strings. Rather, the strings move and vibrate within these extra dimensions to form all the known elementary particles, where each kind particle, for example whether it's an electron or quark, is a different vibration mode of the string. One of these string vibration modes always seems to include a graviton, which is why string theory appears to successfully unite general relativity with quantum mechanics. Sorry if I seem to keep correcting you.


Nah its fine, i was getting at the fact that string theory got its name from the way the strings were first described. The strings emanating from the extra dimensions were described to be very thin, so thin that we cant interact with them but they could be described to each have unique length. Hence "string theory". Of course i don't mean length in the classical sense, rather length measured through time and space.

Now the strings are described in two states, closed (loop) and string. As said the so called "vibration" of the string is said to correspond to the particle it creates in our 4 dimensions.

So i suppose you could look at our 4 dimensional existence as kind of like a shadow on a wall...


But so I shouldn't picture those extra dimensions from string theory as directions which we are unable to see? And strings are only two dimensional right? But I shouldn't think that we are like flatland to the fourth, or fifth dimension?

By the way, everything outside the border of our universe should be nothing, because the fundamental laws and forces of nature only exist inside our universe because they are bound to the dimensions of our universe, right?

If there are in fact multiple universes, there could be other fundamental laws and forces in those universes, we don't even know for sure if our universe has only the four fundamental forces of gravity, the electromagnetic force, the weak and the strong nuclear force, but we have observed those and think we can explain everything using those four forces.

So to my idea we can see the universe as a system that we can explain using laws, and outside this system there can't be anything except for if our system is part of a bigger system, but we can't know that until we are able to even get to the border of the universe but I don't think that will ever happen.



Tom_Kakes
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Posts: 342

05 Sep 2011, 7:36 am

Quote:
But so I shouldn't picture those extra dimensions from string theory as directions which we are unable to see? And strings are only two dimensional right? But I shouldn't think that we are like flatland to the fourth, or fifth dimension?


You can interpret the strings as being two dimensional but its very hard to picture the nature of the 7 extra dimensions as we have no real concepts in our four dimensional realm to explain them by. That said, i did read an article where a computer "map" was made of the extra dimensions but i cant find it right now.

Quote:
By the way, everything outside the border of our universe should be nothing, because the fundamental laws and forces of nature only exist inside our universe because they are bound to the dimensions of our universe, right?


That is correct but your thinking too human lol. As said, the uncertainty in the early quantum scale universe gave rise to every possibility being fulfilled so each reality took off from there, the multiverse. Much like an electron can have an infinite number of possibilities/positions so too could the quantum scale early universe. The almost infinite number of universes each went their own direction from there.

Quote:
If there are in fact multiple universes, there could be other fundamental laws and forces in those universes, we don't even know for sure if our universe has only the four fundamental forces of gravity, the electromagnetic force, the weak and the strong nuclear force, but we have observed those and think we can explain everything using those four forces.


Correct!

Quote:
So to my idea we can see the universe as a system that we can explain using laws, and outside this system there can't be anything except for if our system is part of a bigger system, but we can't know that until we are able to even get to the border of the universe but I don't think that will ever happen.


There is probably no outside system(as yet lol), rather different iterations of the same universe(kind of). The "border" might be closer than we think ;)



Last edited by Tom_Kakes on 05 Sep 2011, 7:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

Tom_Kakes
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Posts: 342

05 Sep 2011, 7:47 am

X2



DarcVidosa
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2011
Posts: 37
Location: Amsterdam

05 Sep 2011, 12:17 pm

Tom_Kakes wrote:
There is probably no outside system(as yet lol), rather different iterations of the same universe(kind of). The "border" might be closer than we think ;)

Hehe. :D



androbot2084
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age:54
Posts: 3,497

05 Sep 2011, 11:48 pm

The Universe has no borders.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age:78
Posts: 31,726
Location: New Jersey

06 Sep 2011, 4:41 am

Tom_Kakes wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Tom_Kakes wrote:

Image

The blue pixel is earth...



.


Or as Carl Sagan said billyuns and billyuns of times: the pale blue pixel.

ruveyn


Lol

Everyone must have seen that image by now but as the old saying goes "a picture is worth a thousand words"...

If god exists and the universe was created for humans he made way too much black stuff...


And some would argue that if there is no God then a lot of real-estate is going to waste.

That is one of the lines in the motion picture -Contact-.

ruveyn



Xerillius
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2011
Age:29
Posts: 64

07 Sep 2011, 11:09 am

Tom_Kakes wrote:
Fnord wrote:
sErgEantaEgis wrote:
I know there is nothing outside the universe because the universe is all that exist. But then since the universe is finite, what would it's borders look like? I mean there's a point where the universe stop, and what would be the conditions there, and what would it feel like if I would touch the ''wall'' of the universe?

The universe is infinite. There is no "outside".


I think we shouldn't assume this because only a few hundred years ago, most people saw the earth as flat. Just because they didn't have the whole picture. Not because they were less intelligent.

We certainly don't have the whole picture yet. The universe is not infinate, rather infinate in theory.

In the theory of relitivity, the speed of light is represented as infinate for reasons of ease/elegance. Because it is an absolute of speed (kind of). But the speed of light has a finite speed. The same goes for the universe. Quantum theory can't exist outside so the universe is represented as infinate.

There must be more...


How is it possible that you can spell finite but not infinite)



Tom_Kakes
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Posts: 342

08 Sep 2011, 3:06 am

Xerillius wrote:
Tom_Kakes wrote:
Fnord wrote:
sErgEantaEgis wrote:
I know there is nothing outside the universe because the universe is all that exist. But then since the universe is finite, what would it's borders look like? I mean there's a point where the universe stop, and what would be the conditions there, and what would it feel like if I would touch the ''wall'' of the universe?

The universe is infinite. There is no "outside".


I think we shouldn't assume this because only a few hundred years ago, most people saw the earth as flat. Just because they didn't have the whole picture. Not because they were less intelligent.

We certainly don't have the whole picture yet. The universe is not infinate, rather infinate in theory.

In the theory of relitivity, the speed of light is represented as infinate for reasons of ease/elegance. Because it is an absolute of speed (kind of). But the speed of light has a finite speed. The same goes for the universe. Quantum theory can't exist outside so the universe is represented as infinate.

There must be more...


How is it possible that you can spell finite but not infinite)


What a pointless post...

How is it possible that you can't punctuate correctly?

The typo i made was made on my droid. Saving a typo is as easy as pressing space. Then your stuck with it until you notice yourself or some bored smartass (who can't punctuate) points it out.



gadge
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2011
Age:51
Posts: 805

14 Sep 2011, 7:52 pm

Universe.....endless imo also

Visible Universe....view back into space time. the result of "our big bang" and a very beautiful place

Big Bang......super massiveblack hole gone super nova?

Dark Matter....remnants from big bang (smoke?) or possibly the matter of the universe outside of the visible "our universe"?

one of my interests.."astro physics.. theory"



cw10
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 May 2011
Age:42
Posts: 973

15 Sep 2011, 11:32 pm

The void outside the influence of light and gravity is infinite, the matter/energy in the universe is not.

Infinite matter/energy violates the second law of thermodynamics, and the arrows of time.

The universe is not a perpetual motion machine.



Gifted-Monster
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Age:26
Posts: 578

18 Sep 2011, 12:12 pm

All science thus far is merely perception. What we can perceive from a tiny planet on the edge of a galaxy floating somewhere in the universe.

We don't know if the universe has an edge since by the time we can actually observe it, it's billions of years old and thus what once was, might not be.

Still, to f**k with your heads a bit...what if black holes lead outside the universe, thereby creating their opposite, the white hole. A white hole would essentially be an inversion of all physics we know. Or perceive.

Riddle me this then. What would the edge of the universe be comprised of? Radiation? Dark matter?

Or maybe this Universe is god's left testicle.


_________________
"We will not capitulate - no, never! We may be destroyed, but if we are, we shall drag a world with us - a world in flames."
- Adolf Hitler


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age:78
Posts: 31,726
Location: New Jersey

18 Sep 2011, 12:16 pm

Gifted-Monster wrote:
All science thus far is merely perception. What we can perceive from a tiny planet on the edge of a galaxy floating somewhere in the universe.

We don't know if the universe has an edge since by the time we can actually observe it, it's billions of years old and thus what once was, might not be.

Still, to f**k with your heads a bit...what if black holes lead outside the universe, thereby creating their opposite, the white hole. A white hole would essentially be an inversion of all physics we know. Or perceive.

Riddle me this then. What would the edge of the universe be comprised of? Radiation? Dark matter?

Or maybe this Universe is god's left testicle.


What edge?

ruveyn