Page 6 of 6 [ 86 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age:41
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

02 Nov 2011, 4:57 pm

femme wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
femme wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
femme wrote:
I also want him to explain as a Jew my religion teaches that both men and women where created as equals.


How so? The man was made from the dust of the earth and Havah was made by be cut out of Adam's side. Different modes of manufacture.

ruveyn


In traditional Judaism, women are for the most part seen as separate but equal. Women's obligations and responsibilities are different from men's, but no less important (in fact, in some ways, women's responsibilities are considered more important, as we shall see).

But why am I telling you this you are already know that :lol:


Lilith was the woman that was created equal and she is the mother of Monsters and Belgians.


Lilith is similar to and probably based on a pagan demon named Lulu or Lilu that appears in Gilgamesh and other Sumerian and Babylonian folklore.


Image
Lulu?

I think Lilith is a story to help fix the contradiction between
ויברָא אלֹהים ׀ את־האדם בצלמו בצלם אלהִ֖ים ברָ֣א אתו זכר ונקבה ברָא אתם
and
ויבן יהוָה אלֹהים ׀ את־הצלע אשר־לקח מן־האדם לאשה ויבאה אל־האדם

the tension between Jahwist and Elohist first parent stories.
Ellipses are where all the best stories come from.


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


femme
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 29 Oct 2011
Age:26
Posts: 198
Location: chicago illinois

02 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm

JakobVirgil wrote:
femme wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
femme wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
femme wrote:
I also want him to explain as a Jew my religion teaches that both men and women where created as equals.


How so? The man was made from the dust of the earth and Havah was made by be cut out of Adam's side. Different modes of manufacture.

ruveyn


In traditional Judaism, women are for the most part seen as separate but equal. Women's obligations and responsibilities are different from men's, but no less important (in fact, in some ways, women's responsibilities are considered more important, as we shall see).

But why am I telling you this you are already know that :lol:


Lilith was the woman that was created equal and she is the mother of Monsters and Belgians.


Lilith is similar to and probably based on a pagan demon named Lulu or Lilu that appears in Gilgamesh and other Sumerian and Babylonian folklore.


Image
Lulu?

I think Lilith is a story to help fix the contradiction between
ויברָא אלֹהים ׀ את־האדם בצלמו בצלם אלהִ֖ים ברָ֣א אתו זכר ונקבה ברָא אתם
and
ויבן יהוָה אלֹהים ׀ את־הצלע אשר־לקח מן־האדם לאשה ויבאה אל־האדם

the tension between Jahwist and Elohist first parent stories.
Ellipses are where all the best stories come from.


This revisionist view of Lilith is based primarily on a work called the Alphabet of Ben Sira, which portrays Lilith as Adam's first wife who was rejected because she wanted to be on top during sexual intercourse. Lilith was replaced with Eve, a more submissive second wife.


_________________
I wish I was a Succubus


techstepgenr8tion
SomeRandomGuy
SomeRandomGuy

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age:35
Posts: 16,071
Location: Eating over the sink.

02 Nov 2011, 7:20 pm

femme wrote:
This revisionist view of Lilith is based primarily on a work called the Alphabet of Ben Sira, which portrays Lilith as Adam's first wife who was rejected because she wanted to be on top during sexual intercourse. Lilith was replaced with Eve, a more submissive second wife.
Do you think they may have been trying to paint her up as their version of the demiurge?



femme
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 29 Oct 2011
Age:26
Posts: 198
Location: chicago illinois

03 Nov 2011, 1:51 pm

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
femme wrote:
This revisionist view of Lilith is based primarily on a work called the Alphabet of Ben Sira, which portrays Lilith as Adam's first wife who was rejected because she wanted to be on top during sexual intercourse. Lilith was replaced with Eve, a more submissive second wife.


Do you think they may have been trying to paint her up as their version of the demiurge?


I'm not sure I would have to ask my Rabbi, next time I do to temple :wink:


_________________
I wish I was a Succubus


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age:115
Posts: 9,554
Location: mid atlantic coast usa

04 Nov 2011, 9:25 am

How many of Adams kids were by Eve, and how many by Lilith?

If he had surviving children from both then DNA from both Eve and Lilith would still exist in us living people today.

Both as a group, and as individuals living people would have a mix of nuclear DNA from both Lilith and from Eve.


But mitochondrial DNA comes exclusively from your mom.

So all living individuals today would get all of their mitochondrial DNA exclusively from either Eve, or from Lilith.

So Im tryig to figure out what the ratio of mitochondrial descendants of Eve is to that of mitochondrial descendants of Lilith.

Could YOU be descendant from Lilith?

Forget about vaccines.
Maybe thats the cause of autism.
Inheriting DNA from Lilith!



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age:41
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

04 Nov 2011, 9:43 am

naturalplastic wrote:
How many of Adams kids were by Eve, and how many by Lilith?

If he had surviving children from both then DNA from both Eve and Lilith would still exist in us living people today.

Both as a group, and as individuals living people would have a mix of nuclear DNA from both Lilith and from Eve.


But mitochondrial DNA comes exclusively from your mom.

So all living individuals today would get all of their mitochondrial DNA exclusively from either Eve, or from Lilith.

So Im tryig to figure out what the ratio of mitochondrial descendants of Eve is to that of mitochondrial descendants of Lilith.

Could YOU be descendant from Lilith?

Forget about vaccines.
Maybe thats the cause of autism.
Inheriting DNA from Lilith!


In scripture Eve is the mother of Adams sons.
Maybe we can use Lilith to solve the "Wives problem" making everyone a descendant of Lily
there is also the question of Adams second Wife the one he rejected because he saw her inside out. (from Ben Sira)
Maybe her DNA should show up.

Genesis claims that Eve is the mother of all living but maybe not the mitochondrial mother.
While we are doing Torah genetics how many folks have Angelic y-chromosomes.


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


femme
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 29 Oct 2011
Age:26
Posts: 198
Location: chicago illinois

04 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm

JakobVirgil wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
How many of Adams kids were by Eve, and how many by Lilith?

If he had surviving children from both then DNA from both Eve and Lilith would still exist in us living people today.

Both as a group, and as individuals living people would have a mix of nuclear DNA from both Lilith and from Eve.


But mitochondrial DNA comes exclusively from your mom.

So all living individuals today would get all of their mitochondrial DNA exclusively from either Eve, or from Lilith.

So Im tryig to figure out what the ratio of mitochondrial descendants of Eve is to that of mitochondrial descendants of Lilith.

Could YOU be descendant from Lilith?

Forget about vaccines.
Maybe thats the cause of autism.
Inheriting DNA from Lilith!


In scripture Eve is the mother of Adams sons.
Maybe we can use Lilith to solve the "Wives problem" making everyone a descendant of Lily
there is also the question of Adams second Wife the one he rejected because he saw her inside out. (from Ben Sira)
Maybe her DNA should show up.

Genesis claims that Eve is the mother of all living but maybe not the mitochondrial mother.
While we are doing Torah genetics how many folks have Angelic y-chromosomes.


:lol:


_________________
I wish I was a Succubus


DevilInPgh
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Age:31
Posts: 205
Location: Washington, DC

07 Nov 2011, 7:48 pm

OK, I'm going to put an end to this Lilith mishegas. To my knowledge, the notion of the existence of Lilith has been rejected by modern Jewish scholars, who instead follow the Midrash of Bereshit Rabbah 8:1:

Quote:
Rabbi Yirmiyah ben Elazar said: When the Holy One created the first man, God made it androgynous. That's what it means when it says “male and female God created them.” Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachman said: When the Holy One created the first man, God created it two faced and then (later) sawed it (in two) creating for it two backs, a back here and a back there. They asked him: But what of the verse “and God took one of his ribs (tzela)?” He answered them, [it really means that] "God took one of the flanks (tzela).” The word [tzela] is also used to describe the flank or side of the tabernacle in Exodus 26.


And when you think of it, it is precisely this that explains the context of the verse: "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife, and they shall be one flesh." (Gen. 2:24)



Beaux
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2011
Age:19
Posts: 206
Location: Mississippi, USA

09 Nov 2011, 7:56 am

*To the original post*

. . . I smell sitcom! That was interesting, though, especially as a fan of Neon Genesis Evangelion (Eva is an alternate name for Eve), even if the creator has dismissed these theories.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age:115
Posts: 9,554
Location: mid atlantic coast usa

09 Nov 2011, 5:26 pm

DevilInPgh wrote:
OK, I'm going to put an end to this Lilith mishegas. To my knowledge, the notion of the existence of Lilith has been rejected by modern Jewish scholars, who instead follow the Midrash of Bereshit Rabbah 8:1:

Quote:
Rabbi Yirmiyah ben Elazar said: When the Holy One created the first man, God made it androgynous. That's what it means when it says “male and female God created them.” Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachman said: When the Holy One created the first man, God created it two faced and then (later) sawed it (in two) creating for it two backs, a back here and a back there. They asked him: But what of the verse “and God took one of his ribs (tzela)?” He answered them, [it really means that] "God took one of the flanks (tzela).” The word [tzela] is also used to describe the flank or side of the tabernacle in Exodus 26.


And when you think of it, it is precisely this that explains the context of the verse: "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife, and they shall be one flesh." (Gen. 2:24)


Plato wrote his own creation myth which involved the gods making a critter that was a big ball with two faces on opposite sides and eight limbs which it used to summersault around like a tumble weed to get around.

Then one day this creature got split in two -sliced head to tail, and became two seperate creatures. These were the first man and first woman. And thats why we descnedants of this creature are perpetually yearning for our missing half.

Youre saying that a modern expert thinks that the authors of the Bible independently came up with (or were given by God) virtually the same idea.

If that is the case then why does it say "male and female created he them". Why are "they" already "them"-plural if he made "them" as one hermaphrodite critter?

Sounds like this modern expert is reading alot into it that isnt there.



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age:41
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

09 Nov 2011, 5:36 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
DevilInPgh wrote:
OK, I'm going to put an end to this Lilith mishegas. To my knowledge, the notion of the existence of Lilith has been rejected by modern Jewish scholars, who instead follow the Midrash of Bereshit Rabbah 8:1:

Quote:
Rabbi Yirmiyah ben Elazar said: When the Holy One created the first man, God made it androgynous. That's what it means when it says “male and female God created them.” Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachman said: When the Holy One created the first man, God created it two faced and then (later) sawed it (in two) creating for it two backs, a back here and a back there. They asked him: But what of the verse “and God took one of his ribs (tzela)?” He answered them, [it really means that] "God took one of the flanks (tzela).” The word [tzela] is also used to describe the flank or side of the tabernacle in Exodus 26.


And when you think of it, it is precisely this that explains the context of the verse: "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife, and they shall be one flesh." (Gen. 2:24)


Plato wrote his own creation myth which involved the gods making a critter that was a big ball with two faces on opposite sides and eight limbs which it used to summersault around like a tumble weed to get around.

Then one day this creature got split in two -sliced head to tail, and became two seperate creatures. These were the first man and first woman. And thats why we descnedants of this creature are perpetually yearning for our missing half.

Youre saying that a modern expert thinks that the authors of the Bible independently came up with (or were given by God) virtually the same idea.

If that is the case then why does it say "male and female created he them". Why are "they" already "them"-plural if he made "them" as one hermaphrodite critter?

Sounds like this modern expert is reading alot into it that isnt there.


he cribbed it from Plato.


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/