Page 1 of 4 [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

19 Dec 2011, 3:50 am

Zokk wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
Yes, actually. This may come as a shock, but not everyone comes from a so-called 'normal' family.

Correct me if I'm wrong about the implications of that statement, but I'm going to refrain from taking it as you're implying that I'm some naive little boy who doesn't understand the 'psychological effects of a broken home', or whatever. I'm not. My family's pretty dysfunctional in it's own right, but it certainly hasn't turned me into a self-destructive maniac because of it, or even someone who's able to empathize with characters like that unless I'm severely depressed, like I used to be. But even then, I could tell the difference between a character with a troubled past that actually had a purpose, and a character with a troubled past that the author was just flaunting to make the work seem more transgressive.


You are wrong. Just because I can relate to these types of characters doesn't mean I am like them in any way.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Zokk
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 961
Location: Santa Rosa, CA

19 Dec 2011, 4:12 am

TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
You are wrong. Just because I can relate to these types of characters doesn't mean I am like them in any way.

Right. No offense meant, either way. I might have worded that with a bit too much bite to it, now that I read over it again...


_________________
It takes a village to raise an idiot, but it only takes one idiot to raze a village.


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,183
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

19 Dec 2011, 9:07 am

Don't know about here specifically but that does sound a bit like what's happened with modern art and modern composition where beauty has been seen as tired/uninspired where ugly/absurd has been the new black for close to a century. I'm starting to think a lot of this comes from existentialist and nihilist philosophies, perhaps even an overextended association of 'beauty' with organized religion hence beauty is old fashioned and prohibitive? Possibly all of the above, add in that aspies tend to have - not always - plenty of darker life experiences (admittedly though seeing a Mozart come from us who writes very strong, steady, mentally healthy stuff would be inspiring).


_________________
“Love takes off the masks that we fear we cannot live without and know we cannot live within. I use the word "love" here not merely in the personal sense but as a state of being, or a state of grace - not in the infantile American sense of being made happy but in the tough and universal sense of quest and daring and growth.” - James Baldwin


BrandonSP
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,286
Location: Fallbrook, CA

19 Dec 2011, 10:34 am

TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
Yes, actually. This may come as a shock, but not everyone comes from a so-called 'normal' family.

No one is purely normal in any sense of the word, but what Zokk is speaking against are characters who are designed to be the antithesis of what our society considers "normal" or "good" just for the sake of shock value, pseudo-nihilism, or a fake sense of complexity and depth. A character who stands out in a few ways from the rest is acceptable, even desirable, but no one wants to read about a character who's a one-dimensional deviant in every conceivable way. I certainly don't; I might sympathize with characters who have been unfairly ostracized by society and are therefore regarded as abnormal, but these characters should have some quality that makes them likeable or at least understandable in order to work, and purely messed-up characters that only offend everyone's sensibilities don't achieve that effect.

I also might add that I don't really like stories where not only the protagonists are messed up or unlikeable but also everyone in the story's world. If protagonists must be unsympathetic, they should be balanced by sympathetic antagonists. I need characters that I can root for in order to emotionally invest in a story. Completely negative stories don't give me that. They just scream of pretentious pseudo-nihilism and pointless weirdness.

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Don't know about here specifically but that does sound a bit like what's happened with modern art and modern composition where beauty has been seen as tired/uninspired where ugly/absurd has been the new black for close to a century. I'm starting to think a lot of this comes from existentialist and nihilist philosophies, perhaps even an overextended association of 'beauty' with organized religion hence beauty is old fashioned and prohibitive? Possibly all of the above, add in that aspies tend to have - not always - plenty of darker life experiences (admittedly though seeing a Mozart come from us who writes very strong, steady, mentally healthy stuff would be inspiring).

Honestly, the vast majority of "modern" art is created only to befuddle and irritate people as far as I'm concerned.


_________________
Check out my art for sale over at Society6, dudes!


awes
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 305

19 Dec 2011, 10:47 am

What you are talking about is the 0815 Hollywood s**t^^
Especially movies of the 80s and 90s have been that way but since after being used to the hero, the constant appearance of a deus ex machina and the happy end nobody has seen a reason to watch movies anymore so Hollywood had to develop. You know, why should I watch a movie when I anyway know that there'll be a happy end? why should it give me a thrill when I anyway know that the deus ex machina will save the situation, the typical cliffhanger, the typical Arnold Schwarzenegger or Sylvester Stallone, that's totally boring!
We have developed and need to have interesting characters such as interesting stories instead of a fruit salad of cliffhangers and soft porn- sex scenes.
The only format that still includes all those things is the children TV.
I haven't read any of the books and stories posted by members here and I doubt that many of them would be worth to be read but I just don't think that anybody is interested in reading something normal. We have the normal aspect of life everyday, people who watch movies or read books mostly haven't got the intention to continue with that when they dream.


_________________
WOULD YOU LIKE TO BE MY FRIEND ON YOUTUBE? :D

---> ;D http://www.youtube.com/user/IIIIIawesIIIII

YOU'RE ALL WELCOME!


TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

19 Dec 2011, 2:31 pm

BrandonSP wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
Yes, actually. This may come as a shock, but not everyone comes from a so-called 'normal' family.

No one is purely normal in any sense of the word, but what Zokk is speaking against are characters who are designed to be the antithesis of what our society considers "normal" or "good" just for the sake of shock value, pseudo-nihilism, or a fake sense of complexity and depth. A character who stands out in a few ways from the rest is acceptable, even desirable, but no one wants to read about a character who's a one-dimensional deviant in every conceivable way. I certainly don't; I might sympathize with characters who have been unfairly ostracized by society and are therefore regarded as abnormal, but these characters should have some quality that makes them likeable or at least understandable in order to work, and purely messed-up characters that only offend everyone's sensibilities don't achieve that effect.

I also might add that I don't really like stories where not only the protagonists are messed up or unlikeable but also everyone in the story's world. If protagonists must be unsympathetic, they should be balanced by sympathetic antagonists. I need characters that I can root for in order to emotionally invest in a story. Completely negative stories don't give me that. They just scream of pretentious pseudo-nihilism and pointless weirdness.


See, I wouldn't know about that. I don't read things with no depth to them. Perhaps that's why I didn't understand what the thread was about.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Zokk
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 961
Location: Santa Rosa, CA

19 Dec 2011, 9:07 pm

BrandonSP wrote:
what Zokk is speaking against are characters who are designed to be the antithesis of what our society considers "normal" or "good" just for the sake of shock value, pseudo-nihilism, or a fake sense of complexity and depth. [...] these characters should have some quality that makes them likeable or at least understandable in order to work, and purely messed-up characters that only offend everyone's sensibilities don't achieve that effect.

This. This exactly. :)


_________________
It takes a village to raise an idiot, but it only takes one idiot to raze a village.


Freak-Z
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 299
Location: Scotland

28 Dec 2011, 10:30 am

What is your problem exactly? So instead of interesting characters you want boring "normal" ones? Who are you to decide what is normal? Normal = boring. People like stuff they can relate to.



Freak-Z
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 299
Location: Scotland

28 Dec 2011, 10:55 am

BrandonSP wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
Yes, actually. This may come as a shock, but not everyone comes from a so-called 'normal' family.

No one is purely normal in any sense of the word, but what Zokk is speaking against are characters who are designed to be the antithesis of what our society considers "normal" or "good" just for the sake of shock value, pseudo-nihilism, or a fake sense of complexity and depth. A character who stands out in a few ways from the rest is acceptable, even desirable, but no one wants to read about a character who's a one-dimensional deviant in every conceivable way. I certainly don't; I might sympathize with characters who have been unfairly ostracized by society and are therefore regarded as abnormal, but these characters should have some quality that makes them likeable or at least understandable in order to work, and purely messed-up characters that only offend everyone's sensibilities don't achieve that effect.

I also might add that I don't really like stories where not only the protagonists are messed up or unlikeable but also everyone in the story's world. If protagonists must be unsympathetic, they should be balanced by sympathetic antagonists. I need characters that I can root for in order to emotionally invest in a story. Completely negative stories don't give me that. They just scream of pretentious pseudo-nihilism and pointless weirdness.


No one? there is no possible way you could know that. What qualities would make them more likeable exactly? So if someone is messed up they are unlikeable?



Freak-Z
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 299
Location: Scotland

28 Dec 2011, 11:03 am

Zokk wrote:
Alright, I'm noticing a trend, here... Well, actually, both here and in the Television, Film, and Video section, as well.

So, what I'm noticing is that when writing, people around here seem to opt for completely dysfunctional characters with dark and troubled pasts. What's with that? Are mentally stable and physically capable characters not good enough or cool enough anymore, or what? What ever happened to "normal" protagonists? You know, the ones that are like everyday people, who weren't subject to parental abuse or abandonment, or got into drugs, alcohol and sex at an early age? The ones that grew up in a relatively normal family and had relatively normal lives? It seems like a lot of people around here want to write the next Kids or Ken Park or something, and it's starting to get on my nerves, honestly.

It's like transgression for transgression's sake, or something. Seriously.

I can't be the only one that's noticed this around here, can I?



It's gets on your nerves? really? really? get over yourself. mentally stable and physically capable characters are boring, it's much more that just parental abuse or abandonment, or got into drugs, alcohol and sex at an early age too. I do not want to read about someone who is supposedly 'perfect' and 'normal' and what do you mean by like everyday people? A lot of everyday people are not as normal as you may think.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,461
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

28 Dec 2011, 12:14 pm

Zokk wrote:
Alright, I'm noticing a trend, here... Well, actually, both here and in the Television, Film, and Video section, as well.

So, what I'm noticing is that when writing, people around here seem to opt for completely dysfunctional characters with dark and troubled pasts. What's with that? Are mentally stable and physically capable characters not good enough or cool enough anymore, or what? What ever happened to "normal" protagonists? You know, the ones that are like everyday people, who weren't subject to parental abuse or abandonment, or got into drugs, alcohol and sex at an early age? The ones that grew up in a relatively normal family and had relatively normal lives? It seems like a lot of people around here want to write the next Kids or Ken Park or something, and it's starting to get on my nerves, honestly.

It's like transgression for transgression's sake, or something. Seriously.

I can't be the only one that's noticed this around here, can I?


Well for me personally I relate better to the dysfuncitonal characters with dark and troubled pasts.........so yeah those tend to be the characters in movies I identify with. I don't have much in common with the normal protagonists that led relatively normal lives and grew up in a relatively normal family so I don't relate much to those characters.

I don't really see anything wrong with that sort of preference if you like the 'normal' protagonists better no ones stopping you from that. so why does it get on your nerves if other people prefer the characters with a dark troubled past?


_________________
We won't go back.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,461
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

28 Dec 2011, 12:18 pm

Zokk wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
Yes, actually. This may come as a shock, but not everyone comes from a so-called 'normal' family.

Correct me if I'm wrong about the implications of that statement, but I'm going to refrain from taking it as you're implying that I'm some naive little boy who doesn't understand the 'psychological effects of a broken home', or whatever. I'm not. My family's pretty dysfunctional in it's own right, but it certainly hasn't turned me into a self-destructive maniac because of it, or even someone who's able to empathize with characters like that unless I'm severely depressed, like I used to be. But even then, I could tell the difference between a character with a troubled past that actually had a purpose, and a character with a troubled past that the author was just flaunting to make the work seem more transgressive.


So wait lets get this straight, if someone can relate to one of these broken characters that automatically makes them a self destructive maniac? I think its you who's being a little bit extreme here.

oh crap reading the past few threads on this page makes me think this was a bit unessisary, looks as if it was already adressed.


_________________
We won't go back.


Last edited by Sweetleaf on 28 Dec 2011, 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

28 Dec 2011, 12:39 pm

I don't see how a dark and troubled past is always necessary, but if the character is fairly normal he/she should at least be challenged. A character that never has their perspective and values challenged by anything makes a boring story.



Zokk
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 961
Location: Santa Rosa, CA

28 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm

marshall wrote:
A character that never has their perspective and values challenged by anything makes a boring story.

Certainly true, but that doesn't mean 'normal' characters can't have legitimate character arcs. I'd give examples, but it seems that no one cares if I elaborate on a point or not.


_________________
It takes a village to raise an idiot, but it only takes one idiot to raze a village.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,461
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

28 Dec 2011, 2:40 pm

Zokk wrote:
marshall wrote:
A character that never has their perspective and values challenged by anything makes a boring story.

Certainly true, but that doesn't mean 'normal' characters can't have legitimate character arcs. I'd give examples, but it seems that no one cares if I elaborate on a point or not.


I see nothing wrong with normal characters........I just tend not to relate to them very well at all. But movies/books where a mostly normal individual ends up going through some crazy book/movie plot and ends up learning and changing their perspectives and such because of it can be entertaining I just don't tend to relate to those characters as well as I relate to those who have a more abnormal darker past as its kind what I've had.


_________________
We won't go back.


Freak-Z
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 299
Location: Scotland

28 Dec 2011, 4:59 pm

Zokk wrote:
marshall wrote:
A character that never has their perspective and values challenged by anything makes a boring story.

Certainly true, but that doesn't mean 'normal' characters can't have legitimate character arcs. I'd give examples, but it seems that no one cares if I elaborate on a point or not.


Define normal.