Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Obama Youth FOR PAUL!

Page 3 of 4 [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age:23
Posts: 7,263
Location: Arizona

04 Jan 2012, 3:05 am

Master_Pedant wrote:
Jacoby wrote:

ALTHOUGH, I suppose If you want to talk about a "perverse cult of personality" tho, we can start with how Obama propelled himself to the White House. The O-Bots still haven't abandoned him despite Barack's endless lying and hypocrisy, talk about devotion! Maybe you do have a point here...


That's kind've an ironic reply, as this whole thread started off on the topic of certain Obama supporters doing a 180 to support Ron Paul.


Those certain Obama supporters were few and far in between sadly as as we can see by the results tonight. For the most part, even if expressing some disappointment, Obama's base of supporters has not wavered one bit in their support of him.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age:23
Posts: 7,263
Location: Arizona

04 Jan 2012, 3:06 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Obama's endless lying and hypocrisy? No more than any other president, and very probably less.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Some company he's in.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Age:49
Posts: 23,323
Location: Spokane Valley, Washington

04 Jan 2012, 3:07 am

Jacoby wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Jacoby wrote:

ALTHOUGH, I suppose If you want to talk about a "perverse cult of personality" tho, we can start with how Obama propelled himself to the White House. The O-Bots still haven't abandoned him despite Barack's endless lying and hypocrisy, talk about devotion! Maybe you do have a point here...


That's kind've an ironic reply, as this whole thread started off on the topic of certain Obama supporters doing a 180 to support Ron Paul.


Those certain Obama supporters were few and far in between sadly as as we can see by the results tonight. For the most part, even if expressing some disappointment, Obama's base of supporters has not wavered one bit in their support of him.


I think that's because we "O-Bots" consider what the alternative would be.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Age:49
Posts: 23,323
Location: Spokane Valley, Washington

04 Jan 2012, 3:10 am

Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Obama's endless lying and hypocrisy? No more than any other president, and very probably less.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Some company he's in.


Being the best of a bad lot is still saying something. :lol:

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age:45
Posts: 5,396
Location: International House of Paincakes...

04 Jan 2012, 3:12 am

Master_Pedant wrote:
GoonSquad wrote:
Okay... Just for the record: I'm the product of an upper middle class family. I've never drawn unemployment, welfare, food stamps, or any other type of government handout. Before I walked away from my "career" I made about $60,000/year as an automation tech for a frozen food company. Currently I'm living off a much smaller salary while I pursue a degree in Technology Education at a major public university. The closest thing to a government handout I receive is a merit based state scholarship and student loans.


Damn, GoodSquad, you're attempt to dissuade people from the notion of "welfare bum" Democrats has only served to reinforce the notion of "latte leftists"! !! It's time I correct the situation by noting that I come from a working poor left-wing family.


Dude, I'm sorry. I do mostly drink domestic beer (Miller--high life, not lite) and the cheapest coffee you can get... if that helps.

And, I was pretty poor as a young adult. My dad kicked me out after high school and I worked as a night janitor at Walmart while I studied electronics at the local tech-school.

Later, I got a job as a maintenance tech for $5.75/hr and the world was my oyster... 8)


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age:23
Posts: 7,263
Location: Arizona

04 Jan 2012, 3:21 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Jacoby wrote:

ALTHOUGH, I suppose If you want to talk about a "perverse cult of personality" tho, we can start with how Obama propelled himself to the White House. The O-Bots still haven't abandoned him despite Barack's endless lying and hypocrisy, talk about devotion! Maybe you do have a point here...


That's kind've an ironic reply, as this whole thread started off on the topic of certain Obama supporters doing a 180 to support Ron Paul.


Those certain Obama supporters were few and far in between sadly as as we can see by the results tonight. For the most part, even if expressing some disappointment, Obama's base of supporters has not wavered one bit in their support of him.


I think that's because we "O-Bots" consider what the alternative would be.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


There could of been any number of alternatives to Obama if the demand was actually there for it. Ron Paul is just someone that is superior to him on a whole number of issues but I guess Orwell has a point at the amount of blind partisanship goes into it. Some folks will support the D or R no matter what their policies really are. The left will support Barack Obama because he's "their guy" even if he's not any different than Bush.



GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age:45
Posts: 5,396
Location: International House of Paincakes...

04 Jan 2012, 3:37 am

Jacoby wrote:
Also, I wasn't calling anybody a welfare bum. I don't care how much of the money you've taken or not taken from the government, honestly you should take as much as you can as long as they're offering it because I'd rather see that money go to regular people than overseas or to some banker if its going to be spent anyways. The point was that the welfare state seems to be the overriding issue with the vast majority of so called "progressives" nowadays at the total expense of the wars, ending corporate welfare, civil liberties, etc.


Look. I'm totally against the wars as they are being waged, I'm for civil liberties, and I'm not sure what corporate welfare means, but I'm for rewarding companies who act in the interests of the United States and punishing those who do not.

However, I'm not willing to abandon the new deal for ANY of that. I'm not willing to leave the health care of the poor to charity and I'm not willing to give mega corporations a free reign via laissez-faire economics.

No sir, I'm not gonna do it.


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age:24
Posts: 4,926

04 Jan 2012, 3:43 am

GoonSquad wrote:
I'm not sure what corporate welfare means, but I'm for rewarding companies who act in the interests of the United States and punishing those who do not.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_welfare

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Nader ... Nader.html


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age:23
Posts: 7,263
Location: Arizona

04 Jan 2012, 3:47 am

GoonSquad wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Also, I wasn't calling anybody a welfare bum. I don't care how much of the money you've taken or not taken from the government, honestly you should take as much as you can as long as they're offering it because I'd rather see that money go to regular people than overseas or to some banker if its going to be spent anyways. The point was that the welfare state seems to be the overriding issue with the vast majority of so called "progressives" nowadays at the total expense of the wars, ending corporate welfare, civil liberties, etc.


Look. I'm totally against the wars as they are being waged, I'm for civil liberties, and I'm not sure what corporate welfare means, but I'm for rewarding companies who act in the interests of the United States and punishing those who do not.

However, I'm not willing to abandon the new deal for ANY of that. I'm not willing to leave the health care of the poor to charity and I'm not willing to give mega corporations a free reign via laissez-faire economics.

No sir, I'm not gonna do it.


You're giving the corporations not just free rein but total control via corporatist economics. The government you think protects you from them is owned by them.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Age:49
Posts: 23,323
Location: Spokane Valley, Washington

04 Jan 2012, 4:01 am

Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Jacoby wrote:

ALTHOUGH, I suppose If you want to talk about a "perverse cult of personality" tho, we can start with how Obama propelled himself to the White House. The O-Bots still haven't abandoned him despite Barack's endless lying and hypocrisy, talk about devotion! Maybe you do have a point here...


That's kind've an ironic reply, as this whole thread started off on the topic of certain Obama supporters doing a 180 to support Ron Paul.


Those certain Obama supporters were few and far in between sadly as as we can see by the results tonight. For the most part, even if expressing some disappointment, Obama's base of supporters has not wavered one bit in their support of him.


I think that's because we "O-Bots" consider what the alternative would be.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


There could of been any number of alternatives to Obama if the demand was actually there for it. Ron Paul is just someone that is superior to him on a whole number of issues but I guess Orwell has a point at the amount of blind partisanship goes into it. Some folks will support the D or R no matter what their policies really are. The left will support Barack Obama because he's "their guy" even if he's not any different than Bush.


No, with most of us, it's a fear of seeing the social safety net dismantled, leaving the most vulnerable up s**t creek without a paddle. And no, I don't agree with Dr. Paul when he says that freedom means taking risks - that's just an excuse for letting your fellow citizens sink when they can't swim, but you convince yourself it's not your responsibility to toss a life preserver out.

And Paul is "superior" to Obama? Just what the hell kind of fascistic talk is that? At the very least, you're painting Paul to be some sort of Nietzschean superman!

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age:45
Posts: 5,396
Location: International House of Paincakes...

04 Jan 2012, 4:15 am

Jacoby wrote:
GoonSquad wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Also, I wasn't calling anybody a welfare bum. I don't care how much of the money you've taken or not taken from the government, honestly you should take as much as you can as long as they're offering it because I'd rather see that money go to regular people than overseas or to some banker if its going to be spent anyways. The point was that the welfare state seems to be the overriding issue with the vast majority of so called "progressives" nowadays at the total expense of the wars, ending corporate welfare, civil liberties, etc.


Look. I'm totally against the wars as they are being waged, I'm for civil liberties, and I'm not sure what corporate welfare means, but I'm for rewarding companies who act in the interests of the United States and punishing those who do not.

However, I'm not willing to abandon the new deal for ANY of that. I'm not willing to leave the health care of the poor to charity and I'm not willing to give mega corporations a free reign via laissez-faire economics.

No sir, I'm not gonna do it.


You're giving the corporations not just free rein but total control via corporatist economics. The government you think protects you from them is owned by them.


Nope. I know the government is owned by them. That's why both parties support free trade and we're in a world of s**t.

The thing is, libertarian laissez-faire economics would only make things worse, because the corporations wouldn't even need to bother with buying government.


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 8,241
Location: Seattle Area

04 Jan 2012, 4:55 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
And Paul is "superior" to Obama? Just what the hell kind of fascistic talk is that? At the very least, you're painting Paul to be some sort of Nietzschean superman!

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Now come on Bill, Jacoby clearly said "superior to Obama on a number of issues", and I'm quite certain you understood the meaning perfectly. Did you pick up "Nietzschean superman" from a progressive blog specifically about Paul, or are you recycling it from some anti Ayn Rand screed somewhere?


_________________
Murum Aries Attigit


marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Age:35
Posts: 9,921
Location: Western Washington

04 Jan 2012, 9:59 am

Jacoby wrote:
GoonSquad wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Also, I wasn't calling anybody a welfare bum. I don't care how much of the money you've taken or not taken from the government, honestly you should take as much as you can as long as they're offering it because I'd rather see that money go to regular people than overseas or to some banker if its going to be spent anyways. The point was that the welfare state seems to be the overriding issue with the vast majority of so called "progressives" nowadays at the total expense of the wars, ending corporate welfare, civil liberties, etc.


Look. I'm totally against the wars as they are being waged, I'm for civil liberties, and I'm not sure what corporate welfare means, but I'm for rewarding companies who act in the interests of the United States and punishing those who do not.

However, I'm not willing to abandon the new deal for ANY of that. I'm not willing to leave the health care of the poor to charity and I'm not willing to give mega corporations a free reign via laissez-faire economics.

No sir, I'm not gonna do it.


You're giving the corporations not just free rein but total control via corporatist economics. The government you think protects you from them is owned by them.


A life boat has holes and is taking on water. My solution... plug the holes. Your solution... get rid of the boat and make everyone swim. :huh:



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Age:49
Posts: 23,323
Location: Spokane Valley, Washington

04 Jan 2012, 11:38 am

Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
And Paul is "superior" to Obama? Just what the hell kind of fascistic talk is that? At the very least, you're painting Paul to be some sort of Nietzschean superman!

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Now come on Bill, Jacoby clearly said "superior to Obama on a number of issues", and I'm quite certain you understood the meaning perfectly. Did you pick up "Nietzschean superman" from a progressive blog specifically about Paul, or are you recycling it from some anti Ayn Rand screed somewhere?


I was purposely guilty of hyperbole. I suppose I should have used a smiley face after that sentence, as of all people, I understand that some humor can go over the heads of us Aspies.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



androbot2084
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age:54
Posts: 3,497

04 Jan 2012, 12:38 pm

Right now the economy is so bad that you can't even buy a job yet the right wing calls anyone who is unemployed a welfare bum.