test
Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 

Mootoo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Oct 2010
Age:25
Posts: 1,206
Location: UK (Wiltshire)

21 Jul 2012, 5:27 pm

If the development of knowledge in various fields keeps going at a certain constant rate, then in some centuries' time how could people study the whole of a subject in a single lifetime? (Unless, of course, medical science improves to such an extent that time isn't an average of 80.)



DrPenguin
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2012
Age:37
Posts: 259

21 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm

Even now it's impossible to cover the entirety of a field in detail, they get split into smaller and smaller more isolated sections. A lot of big discoveries come from when scientist cross over from there little safe havens especially in psysics and maths.



puddingmouse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Age:29
Posts: 9,121
Location: Cottonopolis

21 Jul 2012, 5:54 pm

Thread moved from Random Discussion to Computers, Maths, Science and Technology


_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.


Evinceo
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2012
Age:23
Posts: 392

22 Jul 2012, 3:09 am

Sometimes new knowledge invalidates old knowledge, and sometimes improved solutions make old ones obsolete. Also, there's always abstraction...



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age:25
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

22 Jul 2012, 3:36 am

as Evinceo poited out abstraction allows us to fit several concepts under more general concepts, some people also reach a treshhol where their accumulated knowledge allows for easy learning of even comlicated ideas, they have the framework to build upon.

we arent required to remember in the same level of detail either, since computers allow us to have a vat array of precise data at our fingertips in a way we havent had before, that in itself is a large factor in why the rate of gained knowledge is accelerating.

if we talk about raw data we are currently creating more data very two weeks than existed throughout human history till the year 2005, cant remember where i saw that particular fact or even if its true, the general gist of it probably is nonetheless.


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


graywyvern
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Aug 2010
Age:57
Posts: 613
Location: texas

23 Jul 2012, 10:47 am

the myth of progress would have this fictive entity "knowledge" growing on an upcurve without restraint or limit.
just like other things that look good on this curve.
i myself regard it like the multiplication of bacteria, as a cautionary tale.
every culture regards itself as the repository of all necessary wisdom, & whatever it lacks gets pushed beyond some useful horizon of don't-care-to-find-out.
instead of people filling their memories with lore of the tribe, useable skills, & integrated perceptions of their immediate environment, nowadays they stock up with media products, imaginary worlds, & cultivated triviality. i doubt if this fits us for any survival outside of this moment in time which will surely end in most of our lifetimes.
we won't even have maps or encyclopedias by then.


_________________
"I have always found that Angels have the vanity
to speak of themselves as the only wise; this they
do with a confident insolence sprouting from systematic
reasoning." --William Blake