MagicToenail wrote:
I think the big question her is whether Lady Gaga (and Madonna) are sex positive or sex exploitive. Kraichgaur thinks Lady Gaga is Sex Positive and ttqs84thinks she is Sex Exploitive. There are good arguments for each point of view. They are both good on LGBT issues and lean left, so I think their hearts are in the right place, as opposed to Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera, who keeps on alternating between "dirty" and "abstinence advocate." In Aguilera's case I don't know whether it's cynical calculation or she's genuinely conflicted.
Women like Gaga, Madonna, and the like are sex exploitive. The only good one of them can do is that Gaga has proven that she's an authentic musician and performer, unlike Madonna. But both do support LGBT rights which is absolutely a great thing, and I too support LGBT rights. As for XXXtina, yes, she's definitely dirty and sex exploitive. Spear Britney, on the other hand, is definitely NOT the poster child of abstinence advocacy! If she was, can you explain to me why the majority of the songs and videos she does are usually sex-themed? Because she's sexually active before she began her so-called career! Doesn't surprise me. Besides, all these female pop singers have no ability to think for themselves, so they rather follow what these record execs tell them to: "take your clothes off and sing/lipsync these songs we write for you!". These bimbos will do anything to get famous and no one will take them seriously. It's very evident today!
We're both partially right about Britney. She started her career claiming virginity while singing suggestive songs, but you're right she hasn't been an abstinence advocate lately, since Justin Timberlake and her mother spilled the beans on her.