Kiprobalhato wrote:
b9 wrote:
a photo taken in the 1880's of a woman who looks surprisingly modern.
which photo? the photo in the photo or the photo of the photo?
sorry? the one i posted obviously. there is no photo in the photo or of a photo. if you are saying that the post content itself is a photo and seeing things from that point of view, then i hasten to say that the post content is an embedded object that is linked and not a photo in itself.
anyway, i like the way she looks. i rarely see women from this era who look natural. they usually have prim and proper expressions on their faces, and their hairstyles are like overblown meringues.
i think the fringe and basic haircut and relaxed expression shows me (in a superficial way obviously) that i would possibly have liked her if i was alive when she was.