Deutha wrote:
the word democracy defined by the greeks having created it is 'Rule by the people' ...so i doubt there is any country on earth that is really a democracy...more like one day of democracy to elect a government...then they rule the people for the next few years under a dictatorship ;)
The Athenian system was also far from a perfect democracy, as women, slaves and resident foreigners were excluded. The Roman Republic also had issues. For example the Commitia Centuriata or centuriate assembly voted in centuries, in this context devisions within the Five Classes (which excluded the proletarii or capite censi) and was heavily weighted in favour of the better off, and this assembly elected the highest offices of Praetors, Consul and Censors (in ascending order, though the last had less real power) though the Senate could appoint a dictator in time of national crisis, rather like martial law while the two tribal assemblies (they voted in units known as tribes) of the People (patricians and plebeians combined) and of the Plebs were similarly weighted. The Senate had earlier been reserved for patricians, and even afterwards was at least theoretically bound by property restrictions
However the idea of an ecclesia itself (used here in the earlier sense of assembly rather than the later sense of church) or a commitia (assembly, not committee) where the assembled community of citizens meet to vote on legislation is perhaps not without merit, though I can see that it worked better for a city state than for a large nation. The nearest modern equivalent is a referendum on a change to the constitution. Are not these called plebiscites, echoing the name of laws passed in the plebeian assembly convoked by one of the tribunes of the plebs?