test
19 Jan 2007, 7:11 pm
19 Jan 2007, 7:14 pm
19 Jan 2007, 7:19 pm
19 Jan 2007, 7:21 pm
19 Jan 2007, 7:22 pm
19 Jan 2007, 7:24 pm
sderenzi wrote:
3. OS X is no longer limited to a Mac, in truth OS X could run on a PC.
That's not possible...I don't think!!
However -- I do know that one can buy "virtual PC" software for use on Mac OS X, but it isn't FREE or built-in to the OS!
Prove me wrong "''O Wise One'"?!?
19 Jan 2007, 7:32 pm
19 Jan 2007, 7:40 pm
19 Jan 2007, 7:46 pm
19 Jan 2007, 7:51 pm
19 Jan 2007, 7:59 pm
sderenzi wrote:
It's on, are you ready to rumbleeeeeeeeeeee?!
There's a war brewing, one between OS X & Vista. It's about which is better, why, and under the circumstances.
I think we are adults, for now though let's get down and dirty...
Following that logic; you could say OS X is better than Vista because there is a new one due around spring called Leopard. The current one is called Tiger and yes, Vista can give it a good run for it's money. Leopard however will slaughter Vista.
Everyone I know. I'd prefer a tiny bit of overhead to sitting around for hours waiting for the OS to find my files.
This is true, you can get OS X working on a PC, but why bother? I personally would rather use it on the platform that it was intended for, so if anything goes wrong, Apple will help. You're on your own with the hacked versions. Not only that, but have you seen the inside of a Mac Pro, seen how clutter-free they are? Compare that to the insides of a PC which is a complete mess. Also, for the Power-Users, you can get Macs with much higher specs than PCs at this time unless you're willing to invest huge amounts of time and money on something like a Blade server.
There's a war brewing, one between OS X & Vista. It's about which is better, why, and under the circumstances.
I think we are adults, for now though let's get down and dirty...
Quote:
1. Vista is newer than OS X, newer things are naturally better.
Following that logic; you could say OS X is better than Vista because there is a new one due around spring called Leopard. The current one is called Tiger and yes, Vista can give it a good run for it's money. Leopard however will slaughter Vista.
Quote:
2. OS X has spotlight, who wants on-the-fly searching as you type, it slows down everything.
Everyone I know. I'd prefer a tiny bit of overhead to sitting around for hours waiting for the OS to find my files.
Quote:
3. OS X is no longer limited to a Mac, in truth OS X could run on a PC.
This is true, you can get OS X working on a PC, but why bother? I personally would rather use it on the platform that it was intended for, so if anything goes wrong, Apple will help. You're on your own with the hacked versions. Not only that, but have you seen the inside of a Mac Pro, seen how clutter-free they are? Compare that to the insides of a PC which is a complete mess. Also, for the Power-Users, you can get Macs with much higher specs than PCs at this time unless you're willing to invest huge amounts of time and money on something like a Blade server.
Quote:
More ideas?
Yeah, enjoy your G5 and stop boosting windows
19 Jan 2007, 7:59 pm
19 Jan 2007, 8:02 pm
19 Jan 2007, 8:17 pm
andy1976uk wrote:
Then there's this new "Cider" thing from Transgaming (the people behind Cedega) that'll let you run Windows games on a Mac.
"Cider" -- never heard of it... Does it taste like apples??
19 Jan 2007, 8:23 pm
TennisFanatic wrote:
andy1976uk wrote:
Then there's this new "Cider" thing from Transgaming (the people behind Cedega) that'll let you run Windows games on a Mac.
"Cider" -- never heard of it... Does it taste like apples??
lol that's most probably their motivation in having that name. Not good that I only just realized the connection.
Here's a bit more info:
http://www.transgaming.com/index.php?mo ... ay&ceid=24
http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/08/03/cider/index.php
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Windows Vista Ultimate -> Windows Home Premium 7 |
04 Nov 2009, 3:49 pm |
| Vista! |
08 Feb 2007, 7:12 pm |
| Vista? |
16 Feb 2007, 2:53 pm |
| ooh, lookit! Vista sp/2 |
11 Sep 2009, 1:38 pm |
