test
Board index › General Discussion › Getting to know each other

Aspie Neuroscientist

Page 2 of 2 [ 17 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Previous topic | Next topic

Sharkbait
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 2013
Age:47
Posts: 478
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA

26 Nov 2013, 11:57 pm

Being a non-native speaker allow me to reassure you that there were no personal attacks in my reply to you. It's understandable that you may misinterpret my words. You were, however, being chastised.

I was offended that you came here pleading for people to ease up on AutimsSpeaks without knowing--"ignrorance", it simply means you don't know--the story. That is not a wise strategy. You do not get to come here and attack a perceived lack of support for that organization without know the full story. That's your responsiblity. It wouldn't take you that long. So, Adele, I'm of the opinion that you opened yourself up to the heated and curt replies you received.

My statements are all factual, or are my opinions of your stances, not you. In fact, I called you "obviously intelligent."

I'm intrigued though, that your take away was that I wasn't speaking French.

And of course you're free to ignore my responses. Sadly, though you've already read it. oh! Y yo hablo Espanol, that's as close as it gets. Or a little Gaeilge?



bleh12345
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2013
Age:24
Posts: 779

27 Nov 2013, 12:46 am

Adele_ wrote:
Ok... So many personal attacks for what?

@Bleh12345
Your interpretation of my texts are biased by emotions. I just put capital letters and bold characters to provide emphasis to my terms and be very clear, not to be defensive. Your interpretation was obviously biased since my 2nd post and it is biased one again in your interpretation of my answer to you. Now you have chosen to adopt animosity as your mean of interaction with me. Your association with someone who has decided to be clearly condescending to me (Sharkbait) is also an indication of your lake of fortitude in my direction. Therefore I will ignore your comments :)


You've misunderstood. I'm not being biased at all. How you are wording things is indicating you are being defensive. I'm simply saying, with me, there is no need to get defensive. You've proved my point in the paragraph above. I didn't even understand the context of your two paragraphs I responded to. I took the individual sentence literally. I was also very sleep deprived.

Instead of simply asking me any of my opinions, you are dismissing me based on assumptions. Those assumptions, by the way, are incorrect. I doubt many people would agree I'm being hostile.