Parralell Processing as a disorder: the quest for AI
AS will NEED to know the logic behind everything from BIRTH! - the NT child doesn't come out of the womb that smart ... instead they are CONTENT in ABSORBING information at whatever pace they are able to construct any logic behind the info. ... so somewhere along the line when the child from the womb starting absorbing information, it decided that it won't comprehend anything without being able to construct it in a logical manner - in other words your child was smarter than the average child - it had already figured out what a 'conept' is... whereas the NT child just sits their like a sponge waiting for thier synapses to fire ,, like an autonomous computer slowly evolving ... the AS child on the other hand is slef aware earlier because the had developed the idea of a conept, and were able to string together the Logic behind existing. (This could become an intersting thesis for many a subject) ,, so when an entity that can comprehend, yet is immersed in a HIGH DATA invironment ,will choose the 'MOST IMPORTANT' peices of data in order to be able to construct a Logical scenario -ie repeat the data to themselves logically - when their is too much data, a logical path is too difficult to achieve, so we truncate the data in packets ,that can be reconstructed into 'mini' peices of repeatable events logically. That is why certain things will develop faster than others (once the logic for one action is learnt, it can be repeated and re-observed) - the thing is an aspie child will get carried away and start 'playing' with thier newfound logic, observing it over and over and over again, seing some minor change and noting it, reobserving, and observing and over and over .... now while all this is happening the NT child has already gotten bored with observing this 1 little thing over and over again so they decide to move on and try to learn something new, or if they never learnt it properly the first time upon observation .. they put it in the too hard basket and come back to it later (unless they deleted it - in which case they will need to observe it again to re-learn it especially so if it needs logic in order to implement it). The AS child wil be comfortable, observing, re-observing, finding monir changes,, untill the data changes... enlightnement upon the current data set can be achieved which higlights a NEW braoder bigger dataset they can work on -- but if the dataset is too big, and they don't like the dataset being too big, so they may jump back into to the data set they used to stumble upon the enightenment and close the door for a while,,, actually the door is still open but he/she won't be going down the corridor unless the wind blows in some leaves, in which case they will study the leaves. The NT child on the other hand, is already bored with the dataset and has left the building - and if they forgot to draw a map will never return.
anyone else see that Parralell Processing is a disorder! -single Processors rule!
06 Mar 2007, 3:58 am
