i learned that california allows civilians to own tasers, they're not considered firearms. that's encouraging.
lostonearth35 wrote:
There are signs at Disneyland of all places warning people that the resort can cause cancer and birth defects.
Seriously? I know everything causes cancer and birth defects these days, but they do they really have to put up signs about it everywhere in California? And in Disneyland? I'm so depressed, now.
It's a small world after all... hope that tumor is benign...
"reproductive harm" too, right?
proposition 65 warnings here are notorious for being vague and nonspecific and everywhere, their sheer ubiquity and lack of penalty for posting an unnecessary warning sign have rendered the message practically meaningless to a lot of californians.
me? definitely. that's what overexposure does.
the risk of causing cancer a substance needs, to have a warning label on/around it, is really quite low, something like a
1 in 100,000 chance of causing cancer over a 70-year period.it was put in place in '86 to protect drinking water sources. maybe disneyland has some nasty water. that much wouldn't surprise me.
_________________
הייתי צוללת עכשיו למים
הכי, הכי עמוקים
לא לשמוע כלום
לא לדעת כלום
וזה הכל אהובי, זה הכל.