glebel wrote:
I don't see how the State of New York can really prosecute these 'psychics'. It's not like they are strong-arming or black-mailing these people. The clients were simply gullible fools who payed for a service they thought they needed. This seems to me to be more of a nanny state 'Help, protect me from myself! ' kind of nonsense.
In general the schemes these scum run are called "confidence games" and the people who perpetrate them are called "perps" and "con" men/women.
So your contention is that if you or someone else is merely "cheated" out of their money through deception then there is no crime? So if someone is promised something in return for money, and don't receive it, then it's the "victim's" failing?
And just to make sure I understand you: If a person is either uneducated or inexperienced then there is no crime in taking advantage of this person? Would you go so far as to say it's good business to take advantage of those less fortunately endowed with intelligence and/or experience?
Somehow I don't think I understand your statement fully because as I grew up I learned it was better to help and care for those less fortunate. Why do we differ so in our opinions?