Why is Autism the only excuse for bad behavior?

Page 2 of 3 [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

zkydz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2015
Age: 63
Posts: 3,215
Location: USA

10 Apr 2016, 8:09 pm

animalcrackers wrote:
zkydz wrote:
Not hurting others is a far cry from minor inconvenience. I'm just trying to reconcile this in my head.


Do you mean that you think causing minor inconvenience for someone = hurting that person?
Oh, absolutely not.
I'm saying they are opposite ends of a spectrum of behaviour.

Someone yells at someone = minor

Someone striking someone = Major

Yigeren wrote:
zkydz wrote:
"Meltdowns and outbursts are definitely bad behaviour, so no problems there." While it's not purposeful (Who would meltdown in a public situation on purpose?) it is bad behaviour due to the negative consequences to those around you. There, of course, be levels of acceptance due to levels of disability.

A high functioning person such as myself should be held to a higher standard than someone with more severe conditions, bad comorbidities.


I agree with this to an extent. I do believe that I should be held to a higher standard than a lower functioning person. But sometimes people seem to think that I have more control over my meltdowns/outbursts/whatever than I actually do. Believe me, crying in public is really embarrassing to me, and certainly not something that I want to happen. And I don't like getting upset and snapping at people, either.

However, I don't ever destroy property, hit people, or anything like that. But I wonder how much control other autistic people have over those things. Do they have control, or are they refusing to control themselves?
Let me try to clear up what I mean:

As I find things out, I am trying to figure mechanisms to put in place to prevent this from happening in the future. What are the warning signs? What can I do to control things? If I am with a companion, what should they do to help defuse the situation?

That is what I mean.

As to what other people think, that is their problem because they refuse to try.

To me, willful, uncaring behaviour is far worse than uncontrolled behaviour.

However, who is using anything as an excuse is beyond me.

It was mentioned above about trolling in real life. Had it happen to me on the streets of NY one day.

I was outside walking, smoking a cigarette. A woman walked up behind me as the wind shifted direction. She came up even with me and started to threaten me if I ever "blew smoke in her face again." I mean physically threaten me. No matter how I tried to ask how I could blow smoke in her face if I didn't know she was there made no difference. And the more I tried to speak the more angry she got. It was one of those moments I was so blown away that I was so confused about things that I didn't even get agitated.....just more and more confused. She eventually walked off when I started away at the light change.


_________________
Diagnosed April 14, 2016
ASD Level 1 without intellectual impairments.

RAADS-R -- 213.3
FQ -- 18.7
EQ -- 13
Aspie Quiz -- 186 out of 200
AQ: 42
AQ-10: 8.8


Last edited by zkydz on 10 Apr 2016, 8:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

TheAP
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2014
Age: 25
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,314
Location: Canada

10 Apr 2016, 8:16 pm

zkydz wrote:
Oh, absolutely not.
I'm saying they are opposite ends of a spectrum of behaviour.

Someone yells at someone = minor

Someone striking someone = Major

I agree with that. I just don't get what you mean in relation to my post. What did you think I meant by my post?



zkydz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2015
Age: 63
Posts: 3,215
Location: USA

10 Apr 2016, 8:20 pm

TheAP wrote:
So let me get this straight. It's okay to hurt someone's feelings so much that they can't hold it together and have to have a meltdown? But it's not okay to express your feelings because it causes at most a minor inconvenience for other people?

Well, I'm trying to understand this statement. I think I should have just asked for clarification instead of making an assumption.


_________________
Diagnosed April 14, 2016
ASD Level 1 without intellectual impairments.

RAADS-R -- 213.3
FQ -- 18.7
EQ -- 13
Aspie Quiz -- 186 out of 200
AQ: 42
AQ-10: 8.8


btbnnyr
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 May 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,359
Location: Lost Angleles Carmen Santiago

10 Apr 2016, 8:34 pm

Yigeren wrote:
zkydz wrote:
"Meltdowns and outbursts are definitely bad behaviour, so no problems there." While it's not purposeful (Who would meltdown in a public situation on purpose?) it is bad behaviour due to the negative consequences to those around you. There, of course, be levels of acceptance due to levels of disability.

A high functioning person such as myself should be held to a higher standard than someone with more severe conditions, bad comorbidities.


I agree with this to an extent. I do believe that I should be held to a higher standard than a lower functioning person. But sometimes people seem to think that I have more control over my meltdowns/outbursts/whatever than I actually do. Believe me, crying in public is really embarrassing to me, and certainly not something that I want to happen. And I don't like getting upset and snapping at people, either.

However, I don't ever destroy property, hit people, or anything like that. But I wonder how much control other autistic people have over those things. Do they have control, or are they refusing to control themselves?


As adults, my guess is that most people who do those aggressive things like destroying property and physical violence don't work on regulating themselves.


_________________
Drain and plane and grain and blain your brain, and then again,
Propane and butane out of the gas main, your blain shall sustain!


zkydz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2015
Age: 63
Posts: 3,215
Location: USA

10 Apr 2016, 9:11 pm

btbnnyr wrote:
Yigeren wrote:
zkydz wrote:
"Meltdowns and outbursts are definitely bad behaviour, so no problems there." While it's not purposeful (Who would meltdown in a public situation on purpose?) it is bad behaviour due to the negative consequences to those around you. There, of course, be levels of acceptance due to levels of disability.

A high functioning person such as myself should be held to a higher standard than someone with more severe conditions, bad comorbidities.


I agree with this to an extent. I do believe that I should be held to a higher standard than a lower functioning person. But sometimes people seem to think that I have more control over my meltdowns/outbursts/whatever than I actually do. Believe me, crying in public is really embarrassing to me, and certainly not something that I want to happen. And I don't like getting upset and snapping at people, either.

However, I don't ever destroy property, hit people, or anything like that. But I wonder how much control other autistic people have over those things. Do they have control, or are they refusing to control themselves?


As adults, my guess is that most people who do those aggressive things like destroying property and physical violence don't work on regulating themselves.
I would agree on most people who are aware of what they are dealing with but do not make adjustments. But even then things can spiral out of control.

But the person who does not understand what is happening doesn't really have a hope of controlling things if they are not using the right mechanisms.

But even adults who are lower functioning may have much more difficulty regulating things.

I know, for me, when every little thing in life is trying to figure the equation of the moment and that puts a bit more a layer or two of complexity to any situation. I know I will have to find better coping mechanisms and practice, practice, practice. Until that time, I am struggling to figure those mechanisms and just now starting to get the help I need to do that.


_________________
Diagnosed April 14, 2016
ASD Level 1 without intellectual impairments.

RAADS-R -- 213.3
FQ -- 18.7
EQ -- 13
Aspie Quiz -- 186 out of 200
AQ: 42
AQ-10: 8.8


Yigeren
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,606
Location: United States

10 Apr 2016, 11:05 pm

btbnnyr wrote:
Yigeren wrote:
zkydz wrote:
"Meltdowns and outbursts are definitely bad behaviour, so no problems there." While it's not purposeful (Who would meltdown in a public situation on purpose?) it is bad behaviour due to the negative consequences to those around you. There, of course, be levels of acceptance due to levels of disability.

A high functioning person such as myself should be held to a higher standard than someone with more severe conditions, bad comorbidities.


I agree with this to an extent. I do believe that I should be held to a higher standard than a lower functioning person. But sometimes people seem to think that I have more control over my meltdowns/outbursts/whatever than I actually do. Believe me, crying in public is really embarrassing to me, and certainly not something that I want to happen. And I don't like getting upset and snapping at people, either.

However, I don't ever destroy property, hit people, or anything like that. But I wonder how much control other autistic people have over those things. Do they have control, or are they refusing to control themselves?


As adults, my guess is that most people who do those aggressive things like destroying property and physical violence don't work on regulating themselves.


I suppose that's possible. I really did have to work on regulating my emotions when I was young. I had very little self-control, especially when I was angry or frustrated. I had to teach myself to control my temper. I have no idea how I did it, because I was totally out of control before. The worst I usually do now is snap at people, or maybe complain really loudly.

As far as crying goes, I have almost zero self-control. It's simply not possible. Regardless of what I want to happen, I will cry. Sometimes it'll get really bad, and I'll be outright sobbing. It doesn't happen just when I'm sad. It also happens when I'm frustrated, or angry, or hurt. It happens in public. People think I'm crazy when it happens. Totally humiliating when it does.

I now avoid situations that I know will make me emotional when I'm in public or around people I don't know well. Because I can't stand the thought of losing control like that and being humiliated.

I wonder if there's some kind of method to control it.



League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,205
Location: Pacific Northwest

11 Apr 2016, 12:23 am

Yigeren wrote:

However, I don't ever destroy property, hit people, or anything like that. But I wonder how much control other autistic people have over those things. Do they have control, or are they refusing to control themselves?



That is a very good question. I remember my therapist telling me in high school that we are all responsible for our behavior and if we can't be held responsible, then I shouldn't be in the real world. That changed my perspective and now I think if someone seriously can't help themselves when they cause harm to others and destroy property, they should at least live in a mental hospital or something and not be allowed out in public or it's prison for them. We do lock up a lot of mentally ill people and people who are mentally handicapped when they commit violent crimes. So no wonder we do that to them because it keeps the rest safe from them. But then again I think institutions should be reopened again than shoving them into prisons because it's the best we can do. They have basically became mental hospitals for them and more of them are in prison than ever before since lot of the institutions have shut down.

And I like to write and I thought about having the mother go to her daughter'd school and throw things around in her office and strangle her with a phone cord and then I realized if I did that, then that would mean she would need to be in a mental hospital and locked away and not be out in the real world because she is too dangerous if she can't control her actions when she is upset. Also I didn't want to portray autism as being psychopaths when they don't get their way. If someone seriously did that, that would mean they can't function in the real world because they can't control themselves when they are upset so that would mean they would need a mental hospital or go to prison.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses.


Last edited by League_Girl on 11 Apr 2016, 2:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

Yigeren
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,606
Location: United States

11 Apr 2016, 2:05 am

I don't think that everyone is responsible for his/her own behavior. Obviously, there are people who can't control themselves for various reasons. Little children, intellectually disabled people, the elderly (if the person is ill or has dementia), people with mental illnesses like schizophrenia, and people with physical illnesses. Definitely those that often can't control themselves need to have a caretaker or be institutionalized if they can't be controlled.

Basically those who are a danger to themselves or others need to be kept from doing dangerous things. And the people who are choosing to misbehave, or who are choosing not to try, should not be given excuses for the bad behavior.



League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,205
Location: Pacific Northwest

11 Apr 2016, 3:31 am

Yigeren wrote:
I don't think that everyone is responsible for his/her own behavior. Obviously, there are people who can't control themselves for various reasons. Little children, intellectually disabled people, the elderly (if the person is ill or has dementia), people with mental illnesses like schizophrenia, and people with physical illnesses. Definitely those that often can't control themselves need to have a caretaker or be institutionalized if they can't be controlled.

Basically those who are a danger to themselves or others need to be kept from doing dangerous things. And the people who are choosing to misbehave, or who are choosing not to try, should not be given excuses for the bad behavior.


Well that is why there are care givers and group homes and adult guardians because someone can't be responsible so they need supervision. But then they have no adult rights.

My husband ran into his old high school mate on the bus not too long ago and he isn't intellectually impaired but he is slow so he has a guardian that is ordered by the state to be with him for every time he leaves his house. That makes me wonder if it was something his parents ordered for him or if he has gotten in trouble or something with the law and the judge decided instead of sending him to prison and to serve his time, give him a guardian instead and he is not to leave his house without one. I once heard of another story when I lived in Montana and my school counselor told me this story, this one guy broke into someone's home and took stuff because he was told to do it so those people who put him up to it got into trouble and the judge decided to put him in a group home even though he wasn't intellectually impaired, my school counselor said he just wasn't a smart guy. I assume he was probably slow then if he wasn't smart. But yet slow learners are not considered to be disabled or as having a disability by our American standards but in countries like Sweden and the Netherlands it's recognized as a disability while here it's not so they are not protected by the ADA.

So these two people are not responsible for their behaviors so they were given a guardian or put into a group home as a result. I think this is what my therapist was saying.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses.


TheAP
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2014
Age: 25
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,314
Location: Canada

11 Apr 2016, 2:34 pm

zkydz wrote:
TheAP wrote:
So let me get this straight. It's okay to hurt someone's feelings so much that they can't hold it together and have to have a meltdown? But it's not okay to express your feelings because it causes at most a minor inconvenience for other people?

Well, I'm trying to understand this statement. I think I should have just asked for clarification instead of making an assumption.

What I meant was that some people seem to assume that when someone has a meltdown, the feelings of bystanders should be prioritized. I'm saying that the feelings of the person having a meltdown should be prioritized.



zkydz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2015
Age: 63
Posts: 3,215
Location: USA

11 Apr 2016, 2:45 pm

TheAP wrote:
zkydz wrote:
TheAP wrote:
So let me get this straight. It's okay to hurt someone's feelings so much that they can't hold it together and have to have a meltdown? But it's not okay to express your feelings because it causes at most a minor inconvenience for other people?

Well, I'm trying to understand this statement. I think I should have just asked for clarification instead of making an assumption.

What I meant was that some people seem to assume that when someone has a meltdown, the feelings of bystanders should be prioritized. I'm saying that the feelings of the person having a meltdown should be prioritized.
Oh wow...I had that all muddled. I will agree to a balance of both sets of priorities. I think most people assume that someone having a meltdown is a matter of a tantrum and not something representing a loss of control.


_________________
Diagnosed April 14, 2016
ASD Level 1 without intellectual impairments.

RAADS-R -- 213.3
FQ -- 18.7
EQ -- 13
Aspie Quiz -- 186 out of 200
AQ: 42
AQ-10: 8.8


CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,285
Location: Stalag 13

11 Apr 2016, 4:02 pm

My take on this is that people like to make autistics the scapegoats, and that's why it's used as the only excuse.


_________________
Who wants to adopt a Sweet Pea?


GarTog
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 148
Location: UK

12 Apr 2016, 8:38 am

People are aware what happens when the amygdala becomes stimulated in stress situations? This "choice" of action is questionable in NT's let alone anyone on the spectrum. Rational thought becomes very difficult as access to the Frontal Lobes is curtailed, the brain then begins to Pattern Match looking for similar situations which are usually stressful in themselves. The "3 F's" then take over (Fight/Flight/Freeze)...

Just thought an idea of the process that can lead to "bad behaviour" might be helpful.
You can of course train yourself to cope with situations but you have to develop insight and that can be problematic if the environment is not conducive.



muffinhead
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 12 Mar 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 273

12 Apr 2016, 9:50 am

Some good points here. I think that their needs to be a cmptomise between the two opposing psrties, if possible. The autistic person should try to control his or her behavior to the greatedt extent at which it doesn't cause emotional distress. The NT person should be accepting of the moments when everything becomes overwhelming for the person with autism. Lastly, there needs to be an acknowledgment that there is a difference in the ASD individual, and that he or she can't function properly in some instances.


_________________
Neurodiverse score: 139/200
Neurotypical score: 62/200


btbnnyr
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 May 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,359
Location: Lost Angleles Carmen Santiago

12 Apr 2016, 12:54 pm

I think autism is not an excuse for people to do property damage or be violent to others.
If they are doing these things, they are abusing others and violating the rights of others, so they should not go out in public if they can't control themselves from doing these things in stressful situations.
If they are doing these things at home, they are also abusing others, such as their family members.
If they don't know what they are doing, they are not to blame personally, but they should be kept away from others who might be harmed by them.
If they know what they are doing and are not trying to learn to regulate themselves and blame on autism, then they are to blame personally.
Some autistic people do have strong emotional reactions, but they don't harm others, and never do violent acts against objects or people.
People who do those things are violent, and should be considered violent and dangerous if they can't or don't control themselves.


_________________
Drain and plane and grain and blain your brain, and then again,
Propane and butane out of the gas main, your blain shall sustain!


SSmith44
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 1 Apr 2016
Gender: Female
Posts: 41
Location: Dorset, England

12 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm

Fnord wrote:
SpaceAgeBushRanger wrote:
Autism is probably the main condition used as an excuse for bad behaviour ...
I assume that you've never heard of "Pre-Menstrual Syndrome".

"Women complain about premenstrual syndrome, but I think of it as the only time of the month that I can be myself." -- Roseanne Barr


Ever heard of testosterone? When males are in their peak levels of testosterone in late teens and early 20s they cause more dangerous car accidents and fatal injuries from fighting than anybody else.