Page 5 of 5 [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

17 May 2016, 10:49 pm

I'll catch you on the next debate Jacoby. :wink: This one's been pretty well discussed and to be frank I'm done with it because I have other interests on the site aside from this thread that I'd like to spend time on. (Politics is only a side interest for me here). It was a lively and edgy discussion, the type I enjoy-- thanks for participating and sparring with me, same with you Dox, there were some good zingers in this one. Also, let's face it, this got way off topic: we're talking African-American voting block in a thread titled "Will Trump Disclose his Taxes?" Lol, only in PPR. 'Till the next debate. :wink:



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,794
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

18 May 2016, 1:23 am

Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Herman Cain and Ben Carson both were at one point leading the polls in the primary, Michael Steele was a popular chairman of the RNC(not so much with the party insiders) for a few years not too long ago, Tim Scott was the African-American to serve in the US Senate from the south since the end of Reconstruction and there have only been 4 in between all together. I think if anything there are way way more Republicans who are more eager to vote for a minority(that shares their views of course) to show they're not racist than their are those who refuse. Lets not forget that Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are both Hispanic too, the GOP field was much much more diverse than the Democratic field this go around.

Trump will win more the black vote than any Republican in decades, you can't lump Trump in with these loser Republicans because he isn't one and his policies will appeal to the poor and working class of all races. Trump will do much better with Hispanics than people expect. People think everyone votes for these social identity issues but this is about our pocketbooks and jobs.


Don't forget, Republicans during Reconstruction were the liberals, unlike republicans today. That, and while Rubio and Cruz are both Latinos, they're also Cubans, who by and large represent a conservative voting block, very different from most other Latino Americans.


And the liberals of yore were more like the libertarians of today whereas most self identified liberals now are more closer to some form of socialism or progressivism which are not liberal at all.

The point was to refute that the GOP electorate is so wantonly racist that they couldn't even bring themselves to vote for a minority that shares their views which I don't believe is the case and I think there is plenty evidence to suggest the opposite.


If liberals of old were closer to libertarians, why is it that they were behind government action against states rights, such as radical reconstruction, and even emancipation?
And while it's hardly true that every Republican is a racist, the fact remains, Nixon with his southern strategy, then later Reagan, were both able to capitalize on southern white racial resentment by making gains for the Republicans in Dixie. The fact that politics are so racially polarized in southern red states in itself shows how racism is a factor among the lily white Republicans.


Probably because the radical Republicans at the time were not liberal in any way, there is a lot more nuance to pre and post civil war politics than most people that haven't read or been taught about it extensively. You really can't put modern terms on stuff that happened a 150 years ago. The country was extremely fractured, radicals who championed and wanted the war were never the majority but the country was so fractured that they were able to wield significant influence. The radicals were often more times than not motivated by religious fervor in their anti-slavery views as John Brown was, I wouldn't call John Brown a liberal. Also lets not discount that there were also significant business interests at play as well with northern industrialists.

The demonization of southerners and Republicans doesn't make a lot of sense to me, I'm pure Yankee blood and in my experience the most racially tense places in this country are the big urban northern cities out out east. The city I was born in and the birthplace of progressivism is still one of the most segregated places in the country.

Regardless, Trump's message transcends racial lines even to legal Hispanics. There is nothing racist about his proposals, Trump is a metropolitan and I don't believe he's a racist or sexist or anything like that. The elites that all try to demonize Trump now all universally accepted him and his money until he started messing with their free lunch.


I'm not talking about John Brown, who was a well intentioned fanatic, but Lincoln, his cabinet, and congressional radicals like Thaddeus Stevens, who had enacted emancipation, and who had been behind the Freedman's Bureau during radical reconstruction.
And who said northern cities were paragons of racial progressivism? Racism exists everywhere, and with it anger. But that hardly dismisses the blatant racism in conservative states, whether those states had been under the control of old time southern Democrats, or the Republicans of today.
And yes, it's absolutely true the political parties of old can't be held to modern standards of conservatism or liberalism. That said, Lincoln could hardly fit in the Republican party of today, while Jefferson Davis hardly would fit in with modern day Democrats.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

22 Sep 2016, 12:37 am

Mootoo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,942
Location: over the rainbow

22 Sep 2016, 12:45 am

"Satirical and futuristic news"... hypocrisy, on the other hand, very real indeed.



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

17 Oct 2016, 5:04 pm

Given the statements Trump has made in the past, accusing others of not paying their fair share of tax, disclosing his returns now might expose him to being voted "tax hypocrite of the century". He evaded calls to release them (despite every other candidate having done so for decades) by trying to shift the blame for that omission on to his rival, ignoring his own double hypocrisy in doing that. (Trump is a loser of incriminating emails himself, he destroyed evidence long ago). The hypocritical email claim is always wheeled out to obscure Trump's non-disclosure issue. Time that this stopped and the returns were made fully available to scrutiny.

Things Trump has said about people who don't pay their share of taxes:
http://time.com/4516001/donald-trump-taxes-twitter/
https://thinkprogress.org/7-tweets-by-t ... .t1bdqh9sd



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

19 Oct 2016, 6:11 am

What assurances has Trump given but not delivered on? (Quite a few, see link). Promises, promises, promises..

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/201 ... t-released



Mootoo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,942
Location: over the rainbow

19 Oct 2016, 2:55 pm

Funny how his cult thinks he's 'honest' and yet rated worst liar by Politifact in addition to being... the only presidential candidate ever to not release his taxes, I think... which would make him the least honest, presumably, unless honesty is redefined.



Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

19 Oct 2016, 6:46 pm

Mootoo wrote:
Funny how his cult thinks he's 'honest' and yet rated worst liar by Politifact in addition to being... the only presidential candidate ever to not release his taxes, I think... which would make him the least honest, presumably, unless honesty is redefined.

You have to understand "the bubble". The vast majority of Gump's, oh sorry, I meant Trump's supporters get their news from one of Breitbart's news factories. I say factories, because there are over 1000 sites that are ran by Breitbart under different names and banners, but the stories all originate from one place with minor cosmetic changes to make the articles appear like they were written by different people. All affiliated sites are heavily cross-linked to each other (aside from Breitbart itself, so the main site looks unaffiliated and credible). So you read one story on an affiliated site that says "Hillary kills children", then you click to one of their affiliates that has an article with the exact same story, but minor alterations, perhaps now it's "Hillary maims children" and it appears now that there are 2 people that have the same "facts" that Hillary hurts children-- even though it's just the one central source. Now multiply that by literally 1000's.

Now, if you're a consumer of such "news"-- and trust me, that is a stretch, it's 95% crap you'd see in the "Opinions" sections of a legitimate newspaper-- but anyhow, if you're a reader and you've been sucked into the click ring to affiliated sites you get a completely altered reality of what's going on in the world, since every place you go there's a story about "Hillary killing children". So obviously if you hear someone from outside the bubble repeating actual news, you're going to go, but wait I heard the exact opposite multiple places-- and I'm well informed, I read a lot, so this person is obviously lying! It doesn't matter that what they've been reading is false, the fact that they've read a lot of it and not really checked it's credibility gives them the assumption they are telling the "truth". I mean, seriously, how could it be wrong-- I visited 200 websites and they all said the same thing. It's this "mass verification" that makes them so cocksure of their opinions. A misattributed quote to Joseph Goebbels is appropriate here: "You tell a big lie long enough and people will start to believe it."

So now, take Trump, with all his lies and distortions-- people in the bubble 1. don't get the story because Breitbart's machine doesn't publish it, or 2. they spin it as a lie by the liars in the mainstream media (you know the media not controlled by Breitbart). Then they hear this version literally 100's of times from the same source (masquerading as several sources). The internet has done some amazing things...this is not one of them.



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

19 Oct 2016, 6:51 pm

Today I looked at the "Flying Monkey Trump Supporters cartoon" and thought God Help America. I think only a tiny percentage of the devoted have any idea about how people with NPD manipulate supporters to fly off and do their bidding. Trump's encouragement to assassinate Clinton seemed to be an appeal to his Flying Monkeys, at least from my own perspective.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,794
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

20 Oct 2016, 12:23 am

Aristophanes wrote:
Mootoo wrote:
Funny how his cult thinks he's 'honest' and yet rated worst liar by Politifact in addition to being... the only presidential candidate ever to not release his taxes, I think... which would make him the least honest, presumably, unless honesty is redefined.

You have to understand "the bubble". The vast majority of Gump's, oh sorry, I meant Trump's supporters get their news from one of Breitbart's news factories. I say factories, because there are over 1000 sites that are ran by Breitbart under different names and banners, but the stories all originate from one place with minor cosmetic changes to make the articles appear like they were written by different people. All affiliated sites are heavily cross-linked to each other (aside from Breitbart itself, so the main site looks unaffiliated and credible). So you read one story on an affiliated site that says "Hillary kills children", then you click to one of their affiliates that has an article with the exact same story, but minor alterations, perhaps now it's "Hillary maims children" and it appears now that there are 2 people that have the same "facts" that Hillary hurts children-- even though it's just the one central source. Now multiply that by literally 1000's.

Now, if you're a consumer of such "news"-- and trust me, that is a stretch, it's 95% crap you'd see in the "Opinions" sections of a legitimate newspaper-- but anyhow, if you're a reader and you've been sucked into the click ring to affiliated sites you get a completely altered reality of what's going on in the world, since every place you go there's a story about "Hillary killing children". So obviously if you hear someone from outside the bubble repeating actual news, you're going to go, but wait I heard the exact opposite multiple places-- and I'm well informed, I read a lot, so this person is obviously lying! It doesn't matter that what they've been reading is false, the fact that they've read a lot of it and not really checked it's credibility gives them the assumption they are telling the "truth". I mean, seriously, how could it be wrong-- I visited 200 websites and they all said the same thing. It's this "mass verification" that makes them so cocksure of their opinions. A misattributed quote to Joseph Goebbels is appropriate here: "You tell a big lie long enough and people will start to believe it."

So now, take Trump, with all his lies and distortions-- people in the bubble 1. don't get the story because Breitbart's machine doesn't publish it, or 2. they spin it as a lie by the liars in the mainstream media (you know the media not controlled by Breitbart). Then they hear this version literally 100's of times from the same source (masquerading as several sources). The internet has done some amazing things...this is not one of them.


I had no idea Breitbart's tentacles were so many, or had such reach. :pale:


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

20 Oct 2016, 3:16 am

Nor did I. That explains a lot, thanks.



Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

20 Oct 2016, 8:24 am

Well if you're ever suspicous about the credibility of a website I recommend using www.whois.net-- just type in the domain or ip address and it'll tell you who the site is registered to.



Earthbound
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Feb 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 756
Location: USA

20 Oct 2016, 9:51 am

Trump is a coward, conman, sexist, racist and much more.. the chances of him releasing his taxes are low.

I find it sickening how people don't think this is a sign he is hiding something. Every other candidate for a while now has released them! He shouldn't be some magical exception just because he feels he shouldn't. He has used the same excuses many times for not releasing them. Tax experts and other billionaires have said the truth about audits, but he still plays dumb. People should've been hounding him on his taxes a hell of a lot more. Also people should be asking him why he lies so much. Ask him a question- if he lies about "not saying it", show him the video proof right away, then ask him why he just lied. Last night's debate was more of the same- Trump lying, interrupting and avoiding questions. So pathetic.