Page 4 of 34 [ 529 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 34  Next

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,419
Location: Long Island, New York

19 May 2017, 4:32 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Tollorin wrote:
mr_bigmouth_502 wrote:
Thisgate, thatgate, I'm getting sick of all these goddamn gates. :X

Will they name a scandal involving water "watergate"? :wink:


Or, would a scandal involving the gate industry be called gategate? :lol:


No scandal named "Aspiegate"?


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

It is Autism Acceptance Month

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,784
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

19 May 2017, 6:04 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Tollorin wrote:
mr_bigmouth_502 wrote:
Thisgate, thatgate, I'm getting sick of all these goddamn gates. :X

Will they name a scandal involving water "watergate"? :wink:


Or, would a scandal involving the gate industry be called gategate? :lol:


No scandal named "Aspiegate"?


Give it time.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,464
Location: Right over your left shoulder

20 May 2017, 12:30 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Tollorin wrote:
mr_bigmouth_502 wrote:
Thisgate, thatgate, I'm getting sick of all these goddamn gates. :X

Will they name a scandal involving water "watergate"? :wink:


Or, would a scandal involving the gate industry be called gategate? :lol:


No scandal named "Aspiegate"?


Give it time.


Differently-but-equally-abled-person-with-an-autistic-spectrum-disorder-gate. :lol:


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,784
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

20 May 2017, 3:05 pm

Is anyone even talking about this so called Obamagate idiocy anymore? I tend to think even most Trumpanzees have come to realize this was nothing more than just Trump's baseless paranoia, or an ill-thought out, vindictive tit-for-tat on his part.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


friedmacguffins
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,539

21 May 2017, 11:53 am

Quote:
No scandal named "Aspiegate"?

hacking = weaponized autism



friedmacguffins
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,539

21 May 2017, 11:54 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Is anyone even talking about this so called Obamagate idiocy anymore? I tend to think even most Trumpanzees have come to realize this was nothing more than just Trump's baseless paranoia, or an ill-thought out, vindictive tit-for-tat on his part.


Assuming that it's dialectic, both sides would be compromised.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,784
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

21 May 2017, 12:58 pm

friedmacguffins wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Is anyone even talking about this so called Obamagate idiocy anymore? I tend to think even most Trumpanzees have come to realize this was nothing more than just Trump's baseless paranoia, or an ill-thought out, vindictive tit-for-tat on his part.


Assuming that it's dialectic, both sides would be compromised.


How so?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,784
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

21 May 2017, 2:53 pm

friedmacguffins wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangulation_(psychology)


If you're inferring that the Russia investigation holds as much water as Trump's claims that Obama had spied on him, it should be remembered that the FBI and even some leading Republicans agree with the Democrats that there is fire in that smoke. That, and Trump's badly hidden relationship with Russian oligarchs, his and his top aides' meetings with top Russian spy masters, as well as the resignations of Putin's American fixer-turned-Trump-advisor, Paul Mannifort, and the out-and-out firing of Flynn for his secret Russian connections, makes this obvious, whereas Trump based his claims solely on what he learned from Breitbart - as if that's a legitimate source.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

21 May 2017, 9:16 pm

Darmok wrote:
And it is kind of curious how Obama fled the country shortly after the inauguration, and is now somewhere in the South Pacific... :mrgreen:

I had no idea Washington D.C. was in the South Pacific, here all these years I thought it was between Maryland and Virginia. Damn all that schooling I took with it's damn lies!



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

22 May 2017, 3:44 am

All that and still not an iota of empirical evidence has surfaced. It seems like one is just fueled by a lot more hysteria than the other. And somehow mass hysteria equals more credibility.



friedmacguffins
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,539

22 May 2017, 8:18 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
If you're inferring that the Russia investigation holds as much water as Trump's claims that Obama had spied on him...

So, you have a Russia claim vs. a Russia claim, and decided to blame someone other than Russia.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,784
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

22 May 2017, 2:17 pm

friedmacguffins wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
If you're inferring that the Russia investigation holds as much water as Trump's claims that Obama had spied on him...

So, you have a Russia claim vs. a Russia claim, and decided to blame someone other than Russia.


What Russia claim vs a Russia claim? I only know of one Russia scandal that has come to encompass several people.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,464
Location: Right over your left shoulder

22 May 2017, 5:09 pm

EzraS wrote:
All that and still not an iota of empirical evidence has surfaced. It seems like one is just fueled by a lot more hysteria than the other. And somehow mass hysteria equals more credibility.


How often is the public kept abreast of ongoing investigations? The last thing they need is to help the cover-up effort.


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

22 May 2017, 5:33 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
EzraS wrote:
All that and still not an iota of empirical evidence has surfaced. It seems like one is just fueled by a lot more hysteria than the other. And somehow mass hysteria equals more credibility.


How often is the public kept abreast of ongoing investigations? The last thing they need is to help the cover-up effort.

Watergate is a great example of this: there was no smoking gun tying Nixon to the break-in, a lot of threads that kept leading back to him, but no hard evidence. As the investigation went on more and more threads began to appear and Nixon eventually resigned before impeachment was actually voted upon because he knew it would inevitably lead to him. The Watergate investigation lasted nearly two years by that point-- just because an investigation, especially one at the highest levels of government, doesn't produce hard evidence to the public immediately doesn't mean it's not there.

Michael Flynn's lawyer announced today he would plead the 5th at the senate investigation hearing, that means he's refusing to incriminate himself as allowed by law, but it also means there's incriminating evidence there, at least on his end. It could be that Flynn was acting on his own and that's as far as it goes, but as Watergate showed, it could also be the first thread of many.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

22 May 2017, 10:21 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
EzraS wrote:
All that and still not an iota of empirical evidence has surfaced. It seems like one is just fueled by a lot more hysteria than the other. And somehow mass hysteria equals more credibility.


How often is the public kept abreast of ongoing investigations? The last thing they need is to help the cover-up effort.


I don't know what you're talking about. There's continuous live streams of all of it.